Fecal Microbiota Transplant vs Standard Treatment for Recurrent Non-Obstructive Cholangitis
COLANBIOTA
Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Versus Standard Treatment in Patients With Recurrent Non-Obstructive Acute Cholangitis - COLANBIOTA Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
44
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Patients with abnormalities of the biliary tract (the system that connects the liver to the small intestine and allows bile to flow) are prone to the development of strictures, dilations, or other problems that impede bile flow and promote the formation of gallstones. All of this leads to the development of infections in this anatomical region known as cholangitis. These infections typically require the patient to be admitted to the hospital, either to a general ward or even the ICU. These are, therefore, serious infections that threaten the patient's survival. Unfortunately, one-quarter of these patients experience not just one, but multiple infections of this type over an extended period of time. This condition is called acute recurrent cholangitis (ARC). It is important to note that the antibiotics used to treat these repeated infections lead to the selection of more resistant and virulent bacteria that remain in the intestine for months or years and, in turn, promote the recurrence of these infectious episodes. ARC affects a more vulnerable population, which, combined with the proliferation of resistant bacteria, increases the risk of serious complications and a reduced response to available treatments. Replacing these dangerous gut bacteria with bacteria from healthy donors is a strategy that has proven effective in reducing recurrent urinary tract infections. A similar approach has been successful in patients with chronic vaginal infection (vaginosis). This gut microbiota replacement is currently being investigated for a wide range of diseases affecting various sites, with promising results in some cases. There is strong evidence that this strategy may also be effective in patients with recurrent episodes of cholangitis. The procedure is considered very safe and is subject to strict safety measures to prevent risks to the recipient of these bacteria (requirements similar to those used for blood transfusions). If this strategy proves effective, it could reduce patient suffering and even mortality, as well as save money spent on hospital stays and medications, and contribute to reducing antibiotic use and the emergence of bacterial resistance. Even if no significant clinical benefit is demonstrated in this clinical setting, the information obtained will contribute to increasing knowledge about the role of the fecal microbiota, the technical and scientific aspects of fecal microbiota transplantation, and its potential uses. It should be noted that a patient association called ALBI España (Association for the Fight Against Inflammatory Biliary Diseases) has participated in the study's design and strongly supports this research, which could lead to a reduction in mortality among its patients and a reduction in adverse effects and costs associated with hospital admissions and antibiotic use. In summary, the use of FMT in patients with AC could have a significant impact on treatment effectiveness, reducing new episodes of cholangitis. This would improve patients' quality of life-including their physical, emotional, and social well-being-by reducing hospitalizations and associated complications. Another clear benefit would be the reduction in the proliferation of resistant bacteria and a lower use of antibiotics. The use of TMF would increase the autonomy of the National Health System (SNS) by enabling it to develop and manage non-commercial, non-profit therapies with low production costs, which would guarantee equitable access for patients to an effective and safe therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jun 2026
Typical duration for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2029
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 years
March 29, 2026
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to the next episode of acute cholangitis
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of recurrent acute cholangitis (RAC) episodes
24 months
Intestinal colonization by resistant bacteria
Three months
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALRAC patients will receive
Control
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Patients with recurrent acute cholangitis will receive FMT
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Oral intolerance or inability to swallow capsules.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Any clinically significant disease (other than RAC) such as disseminated malignancy or organ failure resulting in relevant cardiac, hepatic, pulmonary, or neurodegenerative disease with an expected survival of less than one year.
- Inability to understand the study, sign the informed consent, and/or collect stool samples.
- \- RAC due to the presence of choledocholithiasis (any number of stones in the biliary tract) or extrahepatic bile duct stricture that cannot be resolved by surgical or endoscopic treatment. Lack of resolution of extrahepatic biliary obstruction is defined as failure to remove all stones, or a residual diameter in stricture cases of less than 75% of the bile duct diameter above and below the stricture, even after balloon dilation and/or biliary stent placement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (28)
Fiedler SA, Oberle D, Henseler O, Heiden M, Funk MB. Follow-Up of Plasma Donors after Quarantine Storage: Results of a 5-Year Survey in Germany. Transfus Med Hemother. 2022 Sep 13;50(1):26-29. doi: 10.1159/000525747. eCollection 2023 Feb.
PMID: 36818770BACKGROUNDNunez F P, Quera R, Bay C, Thomson P. Fecal microbiota transplant, its usefulness beyond Clostridioides difficile in gastrointestinal diseases. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;45(3):223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 9. English, Spanish.
PMID: 34118321BACKGROUNDTikunov AY, Fedorets VA, Shrainer EV, Morozov VV, Bystrova VI, Tikunova NV. Intestinal Microbiome Changes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis after Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 15;12(24):7702. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247702.
PMID: 38137770BACKGROUNDGreen JE, Davis JA, Berk M, Hair C, Loughman A, Castle D, Athan E, Nierenberg AA, Cryan JF, Jacka F, Marx W. Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of diseases other than Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut Microbes. 2020 Nov 9;12(1):1-25. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1854640.
PMID: 33345703BACKGROUNDBiehl LM, Cruz Aguilar R, Farowski F, Hahn W, Nowag A, Wisplinghoff H, Vehreschild MJGT. Fecal microbiota transplantation in a kidney transplant recipient with recurrent urinary tract infection. Infection. 2018 Dec;46(6):871-874. doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1190-9. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
PMID: 30109576BACKGROUNDJeney SES, Lane F, Oliver A, Whiteson K, Dutta S. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of Refractory Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):771-773. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004052.
PMID: 32925627BACKGROUNDRamos-Martinez A, Martinez-Ruiz R, Munez-Rubio E, Valencia-Alijo A, Ferre-Aracil C, Vera-Mendoza MI. Effect of faecal microbiota transplantation on recurrent urinary tract infection in a patient with long-term suprapubic urinary catheter. J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jun;105(2):332-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Jan 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 32004516BACKGROUNDWoodworth MH, Conrad RE, Haldopoulos M, Pouch SM, Babiker A, Mehta AK, Sitchenko KL, Wang CH, Strudwick A, Ingersoll JM, Philippe C, Lohsen S, Kocaman K, Lindner BG, Hatt JK, Jones RM, Miller C, Neish AS, Friedman-Moraco R, Karadkhele G, Liu KH, Jones DP, Mehta CC, Ziegler TR, Weiss DS, Larsen CP, Konstantinidis KT, Kraft CS. Fecal microbiota transplantation promotes reduction of antimicrobial resistance by strain replacement. Sci Transl Med. 2023 Nov;15(720):eabo2750. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo2750. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
PMID: 37910603BACKGROUNDOverdevest AG, Fritzsche JA, Smit MAD, Besselink MG, Bonomi AM, Busch OR, Daams F, van Delden OM, Kazemier G, Langver J, Ponsioen CY, Swijnenburg RJ, van Wanrooij RLJ, Wielenga MCB, Zonderhuis BM, Zijlstra IAJ, Erdmann JI, Voermans RP. Recurrent cholangitis in patients with a non-stenotic hepaticojejunostomy: incidence and risk factors. HPB (Oxford). 2024 Apr;26(4):558-564. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.01.003. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
PMID: 38245491BACKGROUNDScott A, Khoruts A, Freeman ML, Beilman G, Ramanathan K, Bellin MD, Trikudanathan G. Successful Use of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Management of Nonobstructive Recurrent Cholangitis Following Total Pancreatectomy and Islet Autotransplant. ACG Case Rep J. 2024 Oct 11;11(10):e01527. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001527. eCollection 2024 Oct.
PMID: 39399248BACKGROUNDPhilips CA, Augustine P, Phadke N. Healthy Donor Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Bacterial Cholangitis in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis - A Single Case Report. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018 Dec 28;6(4):438-441. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2018.00033. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
PMID: 30637223BACKGROUNDRamos-Martinez A, Munez E, Del-Campo R, Nieto-Fernandez A, Gonzalez-Haba M, Calderon-Parra J. Fecal microbiota transplantation as a preventive treatment for recurrent acute cholangitis. IDCases. 2024 Jul 3;37:e02025. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2024.e02025. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39071049BACKGROUNDGouveia C, Palos C, Pereira P, Roque Ramos L, Cravo M. Fecal Microbiota Transplant in a Patient Infected with Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: A Case Report. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec;28(1):56-61. doi: 10.1159/000507263. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
PMID: 33564705BACKGROUNDHasegawa M, Sanmoto Y. Recurrent cholangitis and bacteraemia due to Edwardsiella tarda: a case report. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2024 Jan 27;2024(1):omad148. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omad148. eCollection 2024 Jan.
PMID: 38292162BACKGROUNDHong J, Steen C, Wong E, Keong B. Shewanella: an important, emerging and lethal pathogen in a patient with recurrent presentations of cholangitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Dec 10;13(12):e237655. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237655.
PMID: 33303499BACKGROUNDFortun J, Rodriguez-Gandia MA, Pintado V, Martin-Davila P, Garcia-Gonzalez M, Graus J, Martin-Mateos R, Saez de la Fuente J, Muriel A, Moreno S. Oral nonabsorbable antibiotics for prevention of recurrent cholangitis; a brief report study. Infection. 2025 Jun;53(3):1219-1225. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02491-2. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
PMID: 39976806BACKGROUNDvan den Hazel SJ, Speelman P, Tytgat GN, van Leeuwen DJ. Successful treatment of recurrent cholangitis with antibiotic maintenance therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Aug;13(8):662-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01973995.
PMID: 7813499BACKGROUNDBu LN, Chen HL, Chang CJ, Ni YH, Hsu HY, Lai HS, Hsu WM, Chang MH. Prophylactic oral antibiotics in prevention of recurrent cholangitis after the Kasai portoenterostomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Apr;38(4):590-3. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50128.
PMID: 12677572BACKGROUNDMetwally O, Man K. The role of endoscopy in the management of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: a review. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2015 Sep 1;5(4):27858. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v5.27858. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26333855BACKGROUNDElmunzer BJ, Maranki JL, Gomez V, Tavakkoli A, Sauer BG, Limketkai BN, Brennan EA, Attridge EM, Brigham TJ, Wang AY. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 1;118(3):405-426. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002190. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
PMID: 36863037BACKGROUNDLe Bot A, Sokal A, Choquet A, Maire F, Fantin B, Sauvanet A, de Lastours V. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of reflux cholangitis following bilio-enteric anastomosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;41(8):1139-1143. doi: 10.1007/s10096-022-04468-7. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
PMID: 35851931BACKGROUNDWilliams ED, Draganov PV. Endoscopic management of biliary strictures after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug 14;15(30):3725-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3725.
PMID: 19673012BACKGROUNDLi K, Hu X, Lu Q, Zhang H, Zhou J, Tian S, Zhou F. Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria Distribution and Related Factors in Recurrent Acute Cholangitis. Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jul 20;16:4729-4740. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S418752. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37492797BACKGROUNDSugiyama M, Atomi Y. Treatment of acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis in elderly and younger patients. Arch Surg. 1997 Oct;132(10):1129-33. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430340083015.
PMID: 9336514BACKGROUNDBrook I. Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of biliary tract disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2373-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2373-2375.1989.
PMID: 2584384BACKGROUNDBabajide OI, Ogbon EO, Agbalajobi O, Ikeokwu A, Adelodun A, Obomanu ET. Clinical characteristics, predictors, and rates of hospitalized acute cholangitis patients in the United States. Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov-Dec;35(6):640-647. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0756. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
PMID: 36406973BACKGROUNDSung JY, Costerton JW, Shaffer EA. Defense system in the biliary tract against bacterial infection. Dig Dis Sci. 1992 May;37(5):689-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01296423.
PMID: 1563308BACKGROUNDWestphal JF, Brogard JM. Biliary tract infections: a guide to drug treatment. Drugs. 1999 Jan;57(1):81-91. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957010-00007.
PMID: 9951953BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2026
First Posted
April 3, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents will be available starting 6 months after publication of the primary results and will remain available for up to 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Access to IPD and supporting information will be granted to qualified researchers who provide a methodologically sound research proposal. Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators. Approved researchers will be required to sign a data use agreement. Data will be shared in a de-identified format to protect participant confidentiality and will be provided via secure transfer methods.
Individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in this study will be shared after appropriate de-identification. The data will be available starting 6 months after publication of the main results and for a period of up to 5 years. Access to the data will be granted to qualified researchers who provide a methodologically sound research proposal. Requests will be reviewed by the study team and will be subject to the signing of a data use agreement. Supporting documents, such as the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, will also be made availabl