Study Stopped
new study type, it will be re-organiZed as an Investigator Initiated Study (IIS)
Comparison of Effectiveness of Ranolazine Plus Metoprolol Combination vs. FlecainidE pluS Metoprolol Combination in ATrial Fibrillation Recurrences FOllowing PhaRmacological or Electrical CardioverSion of AtRial Fibrillation
PRESERVE-SR
A Single Site, Interventional, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ranolazine Plus Metoprolol Combination vs. FlecainidE pluS Metoprolol Combination in ATrial Fibrillation Recurrences
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice with a prevalence reaching 5% in patients older than 65 years and an incidence that increases progressively with age.1 According to the most recent guidelines, class Ic anti-arrhythmic drugs are considered the first line treatment in patients without significant structural heart disease. Flecainide is effective in preventing AF recurrences in 31-61% of cases according to different studies.2-5 A recent study showed that the combination of Flecainide and Metoprolol improves effective rhythm control in patients with persistent symptomatic AF compared to Flecainide or Metoprolol alone.6 In contrast, the combination of Flecainide and Metoprolol conferred no significant benefit over Flecainide alone in patients with paroxysmal AF. This suggests different underlying mechanisms for paroxysmal and persistent AF. Pulmonary veins are likely the main focus triggering paroxysmal AF while in persistent AF the role of pulmonary veins is less important.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 atrial-fibrillation
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedMay 13, 2019
December 1, 2018
3 months
May 17, 2017
May 10, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of 1-year-recurrences
efficacy and safety of the combination of RN and Metoprolol vs. the combination of Flecainide and Metoprolol in preventing AF recurrences during a 1-year follow-up period in patients with AF of longer than 24-hour duration who were cardioverted to sinus rhythm either pharmacologically or electrically
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of 48-hours-recurrences
48 hours
Study Arms (2)
Ranolazine plus Metoprolol Combination
ACTIVE COMPARATORRanolazine plus Metoprolol Combination in ATrial Fibrillation Recurrences FOllowing PhaRmacological or Electrical CardioverSion of AtRial Fibrillation
FlecainidE pluS Metoprolol Combination
ACTIVE COMPARATORFlecainidE pluS Metoprolol Combination in in ATrial Fibrillation Recurrences FOllowing PhaRmacological or Electrical CardioverSion of AtRial Fibrillation
Interventions
Ranolazine plus Metoprolol Combination in ATrial Fibrillation Recurrences FOllowing PhaRmacological or Electrical CardioverSion of AtRial Fibrillation
FlecainidE pluS Metoprolol Combination in ATrial Fibrillation Recurrences FOllowing PhaRmacological or Electrical CardioverSion of AtRial Fibrillation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with AF
- recently converted to sinus rhythm (\>24hrs and \< 7 days)
- admitted in the 3rd University Cardiology Clinic of Ippokrateion Hospital
- eligible to participate in the study and follow the study procedures
- signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- use of IC antiarrhythmic agents or
- Sotalol during the last 48 hours,
- chronic use of oral or intravenous Amiodarone for the last 48 hours,
- recent acute coronary syndrome,
- heart failure New York Heart Association class III or IV,
- severe left ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction \<40%,
- atrioventricular conduction disorders (atrioventricular block,
- complete left bundle branch block and bi-fascicular block),
- heart rate \< 50 bpm,
- sick sinus syndrome,
- thyroid dysfunction and severe pulmonary, renal, or
- liver disease
- \- not eligible to participate in the study and follow the study procedures
- no signed informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (17)
Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. Population prevalence, incidence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study. Heart. 2001 Nov;86(5):516-21. doi: 10.1136/heart.86.5.516.
PMID: 11602543BACKGROUNDAliot E, Capucci A, Crijns HJ, Goette A, Tamargo J. Twenty-five years in the making: flecainide is safe and effective for the management of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2011 Feb;13(2):161-73. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq382. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
PMID: 21138930BACKGROUNDAnderson JL, Gilbert EM, Alpert BL, Henthorn RW, Waldo AL, Bhandari AK, Hawkinson RW, Pritchett EL. Prevention of symptomatic recurrences of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients initially tolerating antiarrhythmic therapy. A multicenter, double-blind, crossover study of flecainide and placebo with transtelephonic monitoring. Flecainide Supraventricular Tachycardia Study Group. Circulation. 1989 Dec;80(6):1557-70. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.6.1557.
PMID: 2513143BACKGROUNDNaccarelli GV, Dorian P, Hohnloser SH, Coumel P. Prospective comparison of flecainide versus quinidine for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter. The Flecainide Multicenter Atrial Fibrillation Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jan 25;77(3):53A-59A. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89118-7.
PMID: 8607392BACKGROUNDvan Wijk LM, den Heijer P, Crijns HJ, van Gilst WH, Lie KI. Flecainide versus quinidine in the prevention of paroxysms of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989 Jan;13(1):32-6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198901000-00005.
PMID: 2468933BACKGROUNDCapucci A, Piangerelli L, Ricciotti J, Gabrielli D, Guerra F. Flecainide-metoprolol combination reduces atrial fibrillation clinical recurrences and improves tolerability at 1-year follow-up in persistent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1698-1704. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv462. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
PMID: 26893497BACKGROUNDFragakis N, Koskinas KC, Vassilikos V. Ranolazine as a promising treatment option for atrial fibrillation: electrophysiologic mechanisms, experimental evidence, and clinical implications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;37(10):1412-20. doi: 10.1111/pace.12486. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
PMID: 25138058BACKGROUNDSicouri S, Glass A, Belardinelli L, Antzelevitch C. Antiarrhythmic effects of ranolazine in canine pulmonary vein sleeve preparations. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Jul;5(7):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.03.018. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
PMID: 18598958BACKGROUNDBurashnikov A, Di Diego JM, Zygmunt AC, Belardinelli L, Antzelevitch C. Atrium-selective sodium channel block as a strategy for suppression of atrial fibrillation: differences in sodium channel inactivation between atria and ventricles and the role of ranolazine. Circulation. 2007 Sep 25;116(13):1449-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.704890. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
PMID: 17785620BACKGROUNDMurdock DK, Reiffel JA, Kaliebe J, Larrain G. The Conversion of Paroxysmal or Initial Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Oral Ranolazine: Implications for a New
BACKGROUNDFragakis N, Koskinas KC, Katritsis DG, Pagourelias ED, Zografos T, Geleris P. Comparison of effectiveness of ranolazine plus amiodarone versus amiodarone alone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.044. Epub 2012 May 22.
PMID: 22621799BACKGROUNDKoskinas KC, Fragakis N, Katritsis D, Skeberis V, Vassilikos V. Ranolazine enhances the efficacy of amiodarone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2014 Jul;16(7):973-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut407. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
PMID: 24473502BACKGROUNDDe Ferrari GM, Maier LS, Mont L, Schwartz PJ, Simonis G, Leschke M, Gronda E, Boriani G, Darius H, Guillamon Toran L, Savelieva I, Dusi V, Marchionni N, Quintana Rendon M, Schumacher K, Tonini G, Melani L, Giannelli S, Alberto Maggi C, Camm AJ; RAFFAELLO Investigators (see Online Supplementary Appendix for List of Participating Centers and Investigators). Ranolazine in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: Results of the dose-ranging RAFFAELLO (Ranolazine in Atrial Fibrillation Following An ELectricaL CardiOversion) study. Heart Rhythm. 2015 May;12(5):872-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.021. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
PMID: 25602175BACKGROUNDKirstein M, Eickhorn R, Langenfeld H, Kochsiek K, Antoni H. Influence of beta-adrenergic stimulation on the fast sodium current in the intact rat papillary muscle. Basic Res Cardiol. 1991 Sep-Oct;86(5):441-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02190712.
PMID: 1662947BACKGROUNDSchubert B, Vandongen AM, Kirsch GE, Brown AM. Inhibition of cardiac Na+ currents by isoproterenol. Am J Physiol. 1990 Apr;258(4 Pt 2):H977-82. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1990.258.4.H977.
PMID: 2158748BACKGROUNDBurashnikov A, Sicouri S, Di Diego JM, Belardinelli L, Antzelevitch C. Synergistic effect of the combination of ranolazine and dronedarone to suppress atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 5;56(15):1216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.600.
PMID: 20883928BACKGROUNDSicouri S, Burashnikov A, Belardinelli L, Antzelevitch C. Synergistic electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic effects of the combination of ranolazine and chronic amiodarone in canine atria. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;3(1):88-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.886275. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
PMID: 19952329BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Vasilios Vasilikos, MD
3rd University Cardiology Clinic of Ippokrateion Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2017
First Posted
May 22, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share