NCT07507396

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Temple Touch Pro (TTP) in Pediatric Intensive Care Unity (PICU) patients requiring targeted temperature control.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
9mo left

Started May 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress26%
May 2026May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2026

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2026

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

temperature monitoringTemple Touch Proesophagealrectumbladdertemporal artery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Analysis of temperature pairs between TTP and three core locations

    Bland-Altman analysis of temperature pairs between TTP and three core locations to determine bias and 95% limits of agreement during targeted temperature management

    From enrollment to the end of treatment (min. 10 hours)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Analysis of temperature pairs of bladder and rectal to esophageal temperature recordings

    From enrollment to the end of treatment (min. 10 hours)

  • Analysis of temperature pairs between rectal and bladder

    From enrollment to the end of treatment (min. 10 hours)

  • Analysis of temperature pairs between TTP and three core locations

    From enrollment to 24 hours after targeted temperature management.

  • Analysis of temperature pairs of bladder and rectal to esophageal temperature

    From enrollment to 24 hours after targeted temperature management.

  • Analysis of temperature pairs between rectal and bladder

    From enrollment to 24 hours after targeted temperature management.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Temple Touch Pro

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Temple Touch Pro

Interventions

temporal artery temperature probe

Temple Touch Pro

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 0 to less than 18 years of age
  • PICU Diagnosis requiring targeted temperature management. For example traumatic brain injury, cardiac arrest, or anoxic brain injury
  • Requires continuous temperature monitoring with a foley catheter (bladder) or a general purpose probe placed in the esophagus.
  • Enrolled within 24 hours of start of continuous temperature monitoring.
  • Patient has adequate forehead space to accommodate the TTP sensor
  • Temporal artery perfusion not compromised by injury or other pathology
  • No surgical procedure planned for 72 hours
  • Targeted temperature management expected for at least 24 hours at time of consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Already enrolled in another trial addressing temperature management
  • Allergy to medical grade acrylic adhesive
  • Patient does not tolerate placement of TTP sensor on forehead
  • Contraindication to the placement of two or more of Foley, esophageal, and rectal temperature probes.
  • A history of skin irritation, skin sensitivity, or skin disease, including psoriasis, eczema, atopic dermatitis, and skin cancer.
  • Pregnant or lactating female

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53222-3840, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Uminska JM, Buszko K, Ratajczak J, Lach P, Pstragowski K, Dabrowska A, Adamski P, Skonieczny G, Manitius J, Kubica J. Comparison of temperature measurements in esophagus and urinary bladder in comatose patients after cardiac arrest undergoing mild therapeutic hypothermia. Cardiol J. 2020;27(6):735-741. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0115. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

    PMID: 30246234BACKGROUND
  • Shin J, Kim J, Song K, Kwak Y. Core temperature measurement in therapeutic hypothermia according to different phases: comparison of bladder, rectal, and tympanic versus pulmonary artery methods. Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):810-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.023. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

    PMID: 23306812BACKGROUND
  • Nemeth M, Klose K, Asendorf T, Pancaro C, Mielke B, Fazliu A, Saager L, Brauer A, Miller C. Evaluation of the non-invasive Temple Touch Pro temperature monitoring system compared with oesophageal temperature in paediatric anaesthesia (PETER PAN): A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Mar 1;40(3):198-207. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001796. Epub 2023 Jan 9.

    PMID: 36621856BACKGROUND
  • Nair B. Clinical Trial Designs. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):193-201. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_475_18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30984604BACKGROUND
  • Lefrant JY, Muller L, de La Coussaye JE, Benbabaali M, Lebris C, Zeitoun N, Mari C, Saissi G, Ripart J, Eledjam JJ. Temperature measurement in intensive care patients: comparison of urinary bladder, oesophageal, rectal, axillary, and inguinal methods versus pulmonary artery core method. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Mar;29(3):414-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1619-5. Epub 2003 Feb 8.

    PMID: 12577157BACKGROUND
  • Knapik P, Rychlik W, Duda D, Golyszny R, Borowik D, Ciesla D. Relationship between blood, nasopharyngeal and urinary bladder temperature during intravascular cooling for therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2012 Feb;83(2):208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

    PMID: 21906572BACKGROUND
  • Hymczak H, Golab A, Mendrala K, Plicner D, Darocha T, Podsiadlo P, Hudziak D, Gocol R, Kosinski S. Core Temperature Measurement-Principles of Correct Measurement, Problems, and Complications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 10;18(20):10606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010606.

    PMID: 34682351BACKGROUND
  • Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26110027BACKGROUND
  • Fujii T, Takakura M, Taniguchi T, Nishiwaki K. Accuracy of non-invasive core temperature monitoring in infant and toddler patients: a prospective observational study. J Anesth. 2024 Dec;38(6):848-854. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03404-7. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

    PMID: 39256231BACKGROUND
  • Evron S, Weissman A, Toivis V, Shahaf DB, You J, Sessler DI, Ezri T. Evaluation of the Temple Touch Pro, a Novel Noninvasive Core-Temperature Monitoring System. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jul;125(1):103-109. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001695.

    PMID: 28617697BACKGROUND
  • Cox EGM, Dieperink W, Wiersema R, Doesburg F, van der Meulen IC, Paans W. Temporal artery temperature measurements versus bladder temperature in critically ill patients, a prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):e0241846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241846. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 33156823BACKGROUND
  • Brauer A, Fazliu A, Brandes IF, Vollnhals F, Grote R, Menzel M. Evaluation of the Temple Touch Pro noninvasive core-temperature monitoring system in 100 adults under general anesthesia: a prospective comparison with esophageal temperature. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Feb;37(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00851-z. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

    PMID: 35377051BACKGROUND
  • Andreasen TH, Riberholt CG, Fenger AW, Lund A, Vassilieva A, Olsen MH, Moller K. Adverse events registration in clinical trial participants with severe acute brain injury: a Delphi consensus study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Dec 22;167(1):332. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06724-z.

    PMID: 41428104BACKGROUND

Related Links

Central Study Contacts

Kayla Duvall, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2026

First Posted

April 2, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations