Early Detection and AI-Based Management of Skin-Related Neglected Tropical Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa by Frontline Health Workers
SkincAIr
Early Detection and Management of SKIN-related negleCted Tropical Diseases Using Artificial Intelligence in Sub-saharan afRica (SkincAIr)
2 other identifiers
interventional
2,420
5 countries
5
Brief Summary
Skin-related Neglected Tropical Diseases (Skin NTDs) affect about 1.8 billion people worldwide, particularly in poor and rural communities where healthcare access is limited. Many people rely on frontline health workers (FHWs) for treatment, but these workers often lack specialized training in skin diseases, making diagnosis difficult. To address this challenge, the SkincAIr project is testing whether a mobile app powered by artificial intelligence (AI) can help FHWs improve their ability to detect Skin NTDs. The study will be conducted in two arms. In the first clinical image data collection arm (36 months), dermatologists in 5 countries (Kenya, Ethiopia, Senegal, Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria) will collect images of skin NTD and other skin conditions that will be used for development and training of the AI model within the SkincAIr app before it is tested among FHWs. The second validation study arm will take place in 3 countries (Kenya, Ethiopia and Senegal), and will involve 50 FHWs and around 750 patients in each country over 24 months. During the first 12 months (Phase A), FHWs will diagnose patients using standard methods without the app, establishing baseline performance on key indicators including diagnostic accuracy, time to diagnosis, referral patterns, and cost implications of improved primary-level diagnosis. For the following 6 months (Phase B), FHWs will use the SkincAIr app with AI functionality activated to support diagnosis and enable real-time geolocated disease mapping and hotspot identification. In the final 6 months (Phase C), the app is withdrawn to assess whether FHWs retain their improved diagnostic skills. We will summarize the results using simple numbers and charts to show how often things happen and what the average results look like. Researchers will evaluate how well the app improves diagnosis by FHWs and whether FHWs retain their improved skills even after AI support is removed, by comparing their results with those of a skin specialist (dermatologist). Interviews and group discussions will be recorded, written down, organized into key ideas, and carefully reviewed using a computer program to understand the main themes. Study findings will be shared with National Ministries of Health, presented at local and international conferences, and reported to relevant institutional and regulatory authorities. If successful, this AI tool could boost early detection of skin diseases, enhance disease tracking, and improve healthcare in underserved areas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2030
April 2, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.8 years
March 27, 2026
March 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
FHW Diagnostic Accuracy Improvement (FHW-DAI)
Percentage improvement in diagnostic accuracy of frontline health workers (FHWs) when using the SkincAIr Detection App compared to baseline performance without the app. Diagnostic accuracy is measured by comparing FHW diagnoses against the reference standard diagnosis established independently by a co-located dermatologist for each patient case. A minimum improvement of 15% (KPI 1.3) is required to demonstrate clinical utility of the app. Measured across all 3 study phases: Phase A (baseline, no app, M22-M33); Phase B (app active, M34-M39); Phase C (app withdrawn, M40-M45).
Month 22 through Month 45
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Early Detection Rate of Skin NTDs by FHWs (KPI 1.1)
22 through Month 39
Time Reduction from FHW Suspicion to Diagnostic Confirmation (KPI 1.2)
Month 22 through Month 45
Sensitivity of FHW Diagnosis for Skin NTDs (KPI 1.4)
Month 22 through Month 45
Specificity of FHW Diagnosis for Skin NTDs (KPI 1.5)
Month 22 through Month 45
Diagnostic Delay Reduction from First Healthcare Contact to Confirmation (KPI 3.1)
Month 22 through Month 45
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Skin NTD Image Dataset Size and Quality (KPI 2.1-2.4)
Month 12 through Month 48
Study Arms (2)
Clinical Image Data Collection
OTHERDermatologists in 5 countries (Kenya, Ethiopia, Senegal, Nigeria and DRC) use the Dermatologist Dataset eCRF module of the SkincAIr Research App to capture and annotate high-quality clinical images of skin NTDs and other skin conditions during routine clinical activity (M12-M48, 36 months). Structured metadata including disease type, body site, age group, severity and geographic location are recorded alongside each image. Collected images are used exclusively to train and develop the SkincAIr AI model prior to its validation among frontline health workers. Target: \>3,500 high-quality annotated images of skin NTDs across 11 disease categories in 5 countries (KPI 2.1).
SkincAIr Validation Study - Frontline Health Workers
EXPERIMENTAL50 frontline health workers (FHWs) per country (Kenya, Ethiopia, Senegal) and \~750 patients with skin complaints per country participate in a 24-month within-subjects validation study using the SkincAIr Research App. FHWs complete 3 consecutive phases: Phase A (M22-M33, 12 months): baseline data collection using standard diagnostic methods without AI support, using the FHW eCRF only; Phase B (M34-M39, 6 months): AI-assisted diagnosis using the SkincAIr Detection App embedded in the FHW eCRF, activated exclusively during this phase; Phase C (M40-M45, 6 months): AI support withdrawn to assess retention of improved diagnostic skills. Each FHW serves as their own control. A reference dermatologist independently evaluates each patient to provide the gold standard diagnosis.
Interventions
The SkincAIr Research App is a unified mobile platform (Android, offline-capable) containing three role-specific modules: (1) Dermatologist Dataset eCRF - used by dermatologists in 5 countries (M12-M48) to capture and annotate high-quality clinical images of skin NTDs for AI model development; (2) FHW eCRF - used by frontline health workers (FHWs) in 3 countries (M22-M45) to document clinical assessments with and without AI support; (3) SkincAIr Detection App - an AI-powered diagnostic decision-support feature embedded within the FHW eCRF, activated exclusively during Phase B (6 months), providing image-based diagnostic suggestions to assist FHWs in identifying skin NTDs. The SkincAIr Detection App is the primary intervention under validation. If proven effective, it is intended for adoption by National Ministries of Health, integration into national Health Information Systems (DHIS2), and scale-up across sub-Saharan Africa.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Professional Role:
- o Must be working as a FHW at one of the selected health centers at the time of the validation study.
- ▪ Justification: The study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of those directly involved in primary patient care in the targeted settings.
- Willingness to Participate:
- o Willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
- ▪ Justification: Ethical standards require voluntary participation with informed consent.
- Smartphone Usage:
- o Willing and able to use a smartphone during the study.
- ▪ Justification: The SkincAIr app is smartphone-based; therefore, FHWs must be willing to use and have access to such devices.
- No Specialized Dermatology Training:
- FHWs without specialised training in dermatology or extensive experience in skin disease diagnosis.
- Justification: The study aims to evaluate the app's effectiveness among generalist healthcare workers who would benefit most from diagnostic support tools.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Prior Specialised Training in dermatology:
- o FHWs with formal education or extensive experience in dermatology.
- Justification: Including specialists could skew results, as their baseline diagnostic accuracy may already be high, reducing the observable impact of the app.
- \. Refusal or Inability to Consent:
- FHWs unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent.
- Justification: Ethical compliance requires informed consent for participation. 3. Inability to Use the App: o FHWs unable to use a smartphone due to technical limitations, physical impairments, or lack of familiarity with the technology.
- Justification: Effective use of the app is essential for the intervention; inability to use it would prevent meaningful participation.
- Patients with Skin complaints Size
- ● Total Patients: \~750 patients Age Group
- ● All Age Groups:
- o Justification: Skin-NTDs affect individuals of all ages; including all age groups enhances the generalizability of the findings and assesses the app's effectiveness across the lifespan.
- Sex Distribution
- Male and Female Patients
- Justification: Both sexes are included to capture the full spectrum of the disease burden and ensure the app's diagnostic accuracy is effective regardless of sex.
- \. Presenting with Skin Complaints:
- +26 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kenya Medical Research Institutelead
- Universidad Politecnica de Madridcollaborator
- FACHHOCHSCHULE ZENTRALSCHWEIZ - HOCHSCHULE LUZERNcollaborator
- SHERWOOD HEALTHCARE SENEGAL SARLcollaborator
- King's College Londoncollaborator
- TEACUP CONSULTING SLcollaborator
- MTU AUSTRALO ALPHA LABcollaborator
- OMODI, AGASNA, ODIEMBO ADVOCATES LLPcollaborator
- OEUVRES HOSPITALIERES FRANCAISES DE L'ORDRE DE MALTEcollaborator
- ARMAUER HANSEN RESEARCH INSTITUTEcollaborator
- Leprosy and Tuberculosis Relief Initiative Nigeriacollaborator
- UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE DE BUKAVUcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Université Catholique de Bukavu (UCB)
Bukavu, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI)
Addis Ababa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)
Kisumu, Nyanza, Kenya
Leprosy and Tuberculosis Relief Initiative Nigeria (LTR)
Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria
Centre Hospitalier de l'Ordre de Malte (CHOM)
Dakar, Dakar, Senegal
Related Publications (30)
Yotsu RR. Integrated Management of Skin NTDs-Lessons Learned from Existing Practice and Field Research. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 14;3(4):120. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3040120.
PMID: 30441754BACKGROUNDWinkler JK, Fink C, Toberer F, Enk A, Deinlein T, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Thomas L, Lallas A, Blum A, Stolz W, Haenssle HA. Association Between Surgical Skin Markings in Dermoscopic Images and Diagnostic Performance of a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network for Melanoma Recognition. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Oct 1;155(10):1135-1141. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1735.
PMID: 31411641BACKGROUNDWiese S, Elson L, Reichert F, Mambo B, Feldmeier H. Prevalence, intensity and risk factors of tungiasis in Kilifi County, Kenya: I. Results from a community-based study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 9;11(10):e0005925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005925. eCollection 2017 Oct.
PMID: 28991909BACKGROUNDWangara F, Kipruto H, Ngesa O, Kayima J, Masini E, Sitienei J, Ngari F. The spatial epidemiology of leprosy in Kenya: A retrospective study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Apr 22;13(4):e0007329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007329. eCollection 2019 Apr.
PMID: 31009481BACKGROUNDvan Dijk NJ, Amer S, Mwiti D, Schallig HDFH, Augustijn EW. An epidemiological and spatiotemporal analysis of visceral leishmaniasis in West Pokot, Kenya, between 2018 and 2022. BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):1169. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10053-4.
PMID: 39415090BACKGROUNDSimundic AM. Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11. eCollection 2009 Jan.
PMID: 27683318BACKGROUNDShetty VP, Pandya SS, Arora S, Capadia GD. Observations from a 'special selective drive' conducted under National Leprosy Elimination Programme in Karjat taluka and Gadchiroli district of Maharashtra. Indian J Lepr. 2009 Oct-Dec;81(4):189-93.
PMID: 20704074BACKGROUNDSchmid-Grendelmeier P, Takaoka R, Ahogo KC, Belachew WA, Brown SJ, Correia JC, Correia M, Degboe B, Dorizy-Vuong V, Faye O, Fuller LC, Grando K, Hsu C, Kayitenkore K, Lunjani N, Ly F, Mahamadou G, Manuel RCF, Kebe Dia M, Masenga EJ, Muteba Baseke C, Ouedraogo AN, Rapelanoro Rabenja F, Su J, Teclessou JN, Todd G, Taieb A. Position Statement on Atopic Dermatitis in Sub-Saharan Africa: current status and roadmap. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Nov;33(11):2019-2028. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15972.
PMID: 31713914BACKGROUNDSchmeller W, Dzikus A. Skin diseases in children in rural Kenya: long-term results of a dermatology project within the primary health care system. Br J Dermatol. 2001 Jan;144(1):118-24.
PMID: 11167692BACKGROUNDSalinas MP, Sepulveda J, Hidalgo L, Peirano D, Morel M, Uribe P, Rotemberg V, Briones J, Mery D, Navarrete-Dechent C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis. NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 14;7(1):125. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01103-x.
PMID: 38744955BACKGROUNDRoberts W, Lyson H, Speer C, Tovar E, Paz E, Zimlichman E. Cost Savings and Improved Clinical Outcomes From a Mobile Health Cardiovascular Disease Self-Management Program. Value Health. 2025 Feb 13:S1098-3015(25)00068-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.025. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 39954854BACKGROUNDPatel RH, Foltz EA, Witkowski A, Ludzik J. Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Based Approaches Applied to Non-Invasive Imaging for Early Detection of Melanoma: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 23;15(19):4694. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194694.
PMID: 37835388BACKGROUNDOuma FF, Mulambalah CS. Persistence and Changing Distribution of Leishmaniases in Kenya Require a Paradigm Shift. J Parasitol Res. 2021 Oct 18;2021:9989581. doi: 10.1155/2021/9989581. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34707907BACKGROUNDOfire MO, Omanje V, Sempele I, Chami I, Gitahi PN, Njenga SM, Omondi WP. Lymphatic filariasis elimination in Kenya: Tracing the journey from 2002-2024 and pathways to achieving 2030 target. Int J Infect Dis. 2025 Mar;152:107839. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107839. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
PMID: 39929320BACKGROUNDOdiwuor S, Muia A, Magiri C, Maes I, Kirigi G, Dujardin JC, Wasunna M, Mbuchi M, Auwera GV. Identification of Leishmania tropica from micro-foci of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Kenyan Rift Valley. Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Jul;106(3):159-65. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000015.
PMID: 23265373BACKGROUNDOchola EA, Karanja DMS, Elliott SJ. The impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) on health and wellbeing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A case study of Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Feb 11;15(2):e0009131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009131. eCollection 2021 Feb.
PMID: 33571200BACKGROUNDNyangacha RM, Odongo D, Oyieke F, Bii C, Muniu E, Chasia S, Ochwoto M. Spatial distribution, prevalence and potential risk factors of Tungiasis in Vihiga County, Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Mar 12;13(3):e0007244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007244. eCollection 2019 Mar.
PMID: 30860992BACKGROUNDNsagha DS, Bamgboye EA, Oyediran AB. Childhood leprosy in Essimbiland of Cameroon: results of chart review and school survey. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2009 Sep-Dec;19(4):214-9.
PMID: 20836334BACKGROUNDNjenga SM, Kanyi HM, Mutungi FM, Okoyo C, Matendechero HS, Pullan RL, Halliday KE, Brooker SJ, Wamae CN, Onsongo JK, Won KY. Assessment of lymphatic filariasis prior to re-starting mass drug administration campaigns in coastal Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2017 Feb 22;10(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2044-5.
PMID: 28228160BACKGROUNDNgere I, Gufu Boru W, Isack A, Muiruri J, Obonyo M, Matendechero S, Gura Z. Burden and risk factors of cutaneous leishmaniasis in a peri-urban settlement in Kenya, 2016. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 23;15(1):e0227697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227697. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 31971945BACKGROUNDMsyamboza KP, Mawaya LR, Kubwalo HW, Ng'oma D, Liabunya M, Manjolo S, Msiska PP, Somba WW. Burden of leprosy in Malawi: community camp-based cross-sectional study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2012 Aug 6;12:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-12-12.
PMID: 22867526BACKGROUNDMieras LF, Taal AT, Post EB, Ndeve AGZ, van Hees CLM. The Development of a Mobile Application to Support Peripheral Health Workers to Diagnose and Treat People with Skin Diseases in Resource-Poor Settings. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 15;3(3):102. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3030102.
PMID: 30274498BACKGROUNDIrwig L, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Gatsonis C, Lijmer J. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):669-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.669. No abstract available.
PMID: 11895830BACKGROUNDHotez PJ, Kamath A. Neglected tropical diseases in sub-saharan Africa: review of their prevalence, distribution, and disease burden. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Aug 25;3(8):e412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000412.
PMID: 19707588BACKGROUNDGitari JW, Nzou SM, Wamunyokoli F, Kinyeru E, Fujii Y, Kaneko S, Mwau M. Leishmaniasis recidivans by Leishmania tropica in Central Rift Valley Region in Kenya. Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Sep;74:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
PMID: 30017946BACKGROUNDElson L, Wiese S, Feldmeier H, Fillinger U. Prevalence, intensity and risk factors of tungiasis in Kilifi County, Kenya II: Results from a school-based observational study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 May 16;13(5):e0007326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007326. eCollection 2019 May.
PMID: 31095558BACKGROUNDDimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2401-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153. No abstract available.
PMID: 25490331BACKGROUNDDaneshjou R, He B, Ouyang D, Zou JY. How to evaluate deep learning for cancer diagnostics - factors and recommendations. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021 Apr;1875(2):188515. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188515. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
PMID: 33513392BACKGROUNDColom MF, Ferrer C, Ekai JL, Ferrandez D, Ramirez L, Gomez-Sanchez N, Leting S, Hernandez C. First report on mycetoma in Turkana County-North-western Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Aug 14;17(8):e0011327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011327. eCollection 2023 Aug.
PMID: 37578968BACKGROUNDCameron HM, Gatei D, Bremner AD. The deep mycoses in Kenya: A histopathological study. 1. Mycetoma. East Afr Med J. 1973 Aug;50(8):382-95. No abstract available.
PMID: 4761208BACKGROUND
Related Links
- The WHO Skin NTD mobile application - a paradigm shift in leprosy diagnosis through Artificial Intelligence?
- The Burden of Neglected Tropical Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Kenya National Tuberculosis Leprosy and Lung Disease Program Annual Report, 2014
- Awareness, Attitudes, Perceptions and Practices of Scabies Infestation among Caregivers of Children under 5 Years of Age in Villages of Kwale County, Kenya
- Mbogori M. 2014 (Thesis)
- Wayne W. Daniel, Chad L. Cross, Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences, 2013, page 191
- WHO. Promoting the integrated approach to skin-related neglected tropical diseases
- WHO 2023. Report of the first WHO global meeting on skin-related neglected tropical diseases
- WHO 2016. Monitoring and Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: a practical guide to conducting research and assessment
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gustavo H Penaloza, PhD
Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM)
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carla Rodríguez Cuesta, MEng
SHERWOOD HEALTHCARE SENEGAL SARL
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2026
First Posted
April 2, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2030
Last Updated
April 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Beginning 12 months after study completion (M60), available for 10 years
- Access Criteria
- Researchers must submit a data access request. Access granted subject to signing a data sharing agreement compliant with GDPR and national data protection laws of participating countries.
Anonymised clinical images and metadata collected via the Dermatologist Dataset eCRF will be made publicly available as an open dataset following project completion (M60). Individual participant data from the validation study will be available to researchers upon reasonable request, subject to data sharing agreements and ethics committee approval. Data will be stored on AWS eu-west-1 for 10 years post-study.