NCT07506967

Brief Summary

Skin-related Neglected Tropical Diseases (Skin NTDs) affect about 1.8 billion people worldwide, particularly in poor and rural communities where healthcare access is limited. Many people rely on frontline health workers (FHWs) for treatment, but these workers often lack specialized training in skin diseases, making diagnosis difficult. To address this challenge, the SkincAIr project is testing whether a mobile app powered by artificial intelligence (AI) can help FHWs improve their ability to detect Skin NTDs. The study will be conducted in two arms. In the first clinical image data collection arm (36 months), dermatologists in 5 countries (Kenya, Ethiopia, Senegal, Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria) will collect images of skin NTD and other skin conditions that will be used for development and training of the AI model within the SkincAIr app before it is tested among FHWs. The second validation study arm will take place in 3 countries (Kenya, Ethiopia and Senegal), and will involve 50 FHWs and around 750 patients in each country over 24 months. During the first 12 months (Phase A), FHWs will diagnose patients using standard methods without the app, establishing baseline performance on key indicators including diagnostic accuracy, time to diagnosis, referral patterns, and cost implications of improved primary-level diagnosis. For the following 6 months (Phase B), FHWs will use the SkincAIr app with AI functionality activated to support diagnosis and enable real-time geolocated disease mapping and hotspot identification. In the final 6 months (Phase C), the app is withdrawn to assess whether FHWs retain their improved diagnostic skills. We will summarize the results using simple numbers and charts to show how often things happen and what the average results look like. Researchers will evaluate how well the app improves diagnosis by FHWs and whether FHWs retain their improved skills even after AI support is removed, by comparing their results with those of a skin specialist (dermatologist). Interviews and group discussions will be recorded, written down, organized into key ideas, and carefully reviewed using a computer program to understand the main themes. Study findings will be shared with National Ministries of Health, presented at local and international conferences, and reported to relevant institutional and regulatory authorities. If successful, this AI tool could boost early detection of skin diseases, enhance disease tracking, and improve healthcare in underserved areas.

Trial Health

70
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,420

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
48mo left

Started May 2026

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
5 countries

5 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress3%
May 2026May 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2026

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2026

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2029

Expected
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2030

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Skin-related neglected tropical diseasesArtificial IntelligenceMobile HealthmHealthFrontline Health WorkersDiagnostic AccuracySub-Saharan AfricaSkin NTDsDigital HealthAI Diagnostic ToolCapacity BuildingKenyaEthiopiaSenegalNigeriaDemocratic Republic of the Congo

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • FHW Diagnostic Accuracy Improvement (FHW-DAI)

    Percentage improvement in diagnostic accuracy of frontline health workers (FHWs) when using the SkincAIr Detection App compared to baseline performance without the app. Diagnostic accuracy is measured by comparing FHW diagnoses against the reference standard diagnosis established independently by a co-located dermatologist for each patient case. A minimum improvement of 15% (KPI 1.3) is required to demonstrate clinical utility of the app. Measured across all 3 study phases: Phase A (baseline, no app, M22-M33); Phase B (app active, M34-M39); Phase C (app withdrawn, M40-M45).

    Month 22 through Month 45

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Early Detection Rate of Skin NTDs by FHWs (KPI 1.1)

    22 through Month 39

  • Time Reduction from FHW Suspicion to Diagnostic Confirmation (KPI 1.2)

    Month 22 through Month 45

  • Sensitivity of FHW Diagnosis for Skin NTDs (KPI 1.4)

    Month 22 through Month 45

  • Specificity of FHW Diagnosis for Skin NTDs (KPI 1.5)

    Month 22 through Month 45

  • Diagnostic Delay Reduction from First Healthcare Contact to Confirmation (KPI 3.1)

    Month 22 through Month 45

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Skin NTD Image Dataset Size and Quality (KPI 2.1-2.4)

    Month 12 through Month 48

Study Arms (2)

Clinical Image Data Collection

OTHER

Dermatologists in 5 countries (Kenya, Ethiopia, Senegal, Nigeria and DRC) use the Dermatologist Dataset eCRF module of the SkincAIr Research App to capture and annotate high-quality clinical images of skin NTDs and other skin conditions during routine clinical activity (M12-M48, 36 months). Structured metadata including disease type, body site, age group, severity and geographic location are recorded alongside each image. Collected images are used exclusively to train and develop the SkincAIr AI model prior to its validation among frontline health workers. Target: \>3,500 high-quality annotated images of skin NTDs across 11 disease categories in 5 countries (KPI 2.1).

Device: A mobile app with AI functionality for diagnosing skin-related NTDs

SkincAIr Validation Study - Frontline Health Workers

EXPERIMENTAL

50 frontline health workers (FHWs) per country (Kenya, Ethiopia, Senegal) and \~750 patients with skin complaints per country participate in a 24-month within-subjects validation study using the SkincAIr Research App. FHWs complete 3 consecutive phases: Phase A (M22-M33, 12 months): baseline data collection using standard diagnostic methods without AI support, using the FHW eCRF only; Phase B (M34-M39, 6 months): AI-assisted diagnosis using the SkincAIr Detection App embedded in the FHW eCRF, activated exclusively during this phase; Phase C (M40-M45, 6 months): AI support withdrawn to assess retention of improved diagnostic skills. Each FHW serves as their own control. A reference dermatologist independently evaluates each patient to provide the gold standard diagnosis.

Device: A mobile app with AI functionality for diagnosing skin-related NTDs

Interventions

The SkincAIr Research App is a unified mobile platform (Android, offline-capable) containing three role-specific modules: (1) Dermatologist Dataset eCRF - used by dermatologists in 5 countries (M12-M48) to capture and annotate high-quality clinical images of skin NTDs for AI model development; (2) FHW eCRF - used by frontline health workers (FHWs) in 3 countries (M22-M45) to document clinical assessments with and without AI support; (3) SkincAIr Detection App - an AI-powered diagnostic decision-support feature embedded within the FHW eCRF, activated exclusively during Phase B (6 months), providing image-based diagnostic suggestions to assist FHWs in identifying skin NTDs. The SkincAIr Detection App is the primary intervention under validation. If proven effective, it is intended for adoption by National Ministries of Health, integration into national Health Information Systems (DHIS2), and scale-up across sub-Saharan Africa.

Also known as: SkincAIr Detection App
Clinical Image Data CollectionSkincAIr Validation Study - Frontline Health Workers

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Professional Role:
  • o Must be working as a FHW at one of the selected health centers at the time of the validation study.
  • ▪ Justification: The study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of those directly involved in primary patient care in the targeted settings.
  • Willingness to Participate:
  • o Willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
  • ▪ Justification: Ethical standards require voluntary participation with informed consent.
  • Smartphone Usage:
  • o Willing and able to use a smartphone during the study.
  • ▪ Justification: The SkincAIr app is smartphone-based; therefore, FHWs must be willing to use and have access to such devices.
  • No Specialized Dermatology Training:
  • FHWs without specialised training in dermatology or extensive experience in skin disease diagnosis.
  • Justification: The study aims to evaluate the app's effectiveness among generalist healthcare workers who would benefit most from diagnostic support tools.

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Prior Specialised Training in dermatology:
  • o FHWs with formal education or extensive experience in dermatology.
  • Justification: Including specialists could skew results, as their baseline diagnostic accuracy may already be high, reducing the observable impact of the app.
  • \. Refusal or Inability to Consent:
  • FHWs unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent.
  • Justification: Ethical compliance requires informed consent for participation. 3. Inability to Use the App: o FHWs unable to use a smartphone due to technical limitations, physical impairments, or lack of familiarity with the technology.
  • Justification: Effective use of the app is essential for the intervention; inability to use it would prevent meaningful participation.
  • Patients with Skin complaints Size
  • ● Total Patients: \~750 patients Age Group
  • ● All Age Groups:
  • o Justification: Skin-NTDs affect individuals of all ages; including all age groups enhances the generalizability of the findings and assesses the app's effectiveness across the lifespan.
  • Sex Distribution
  • Male and Female Patients
  • Justification: Both sexes are included to capture the full spectrum of the disease burden and ensure the app's diagnostic accuracy is effective regardless of sex.
  • \. Presenting with Skin Complaints:
  • +26 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Université Catholique de Bukavu (UCB)

Bukavu, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Location

Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI)

Addis Ababa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Location

Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)

Kisumu, Nyanza, Kenya

Location

Leprosy and Tuberculosis Relief Initiative Nigeria (LTR)

Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Location

Centre Hospitalier de l'Ordre de Malte (CHOM)

Dakar, Dakar, Senegal

Location

Related Publications (30)

  • Yotsu RR. Integrated Management of Skin NTDs-Lessons Learned from Existing Practice and Field Research. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 14;3(4):120. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3040120.

    PMID: 30441754BACKGROUND
  • Winkler JK, Fink C, Toberer F, Enk A, Deinlein T, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Thomas L, Lallas A, Blum A, Stolz W, Haenssle HA. Association Between Surgical Skin Markings in Dermoscopic Images and Diagnostic Performance of a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network for Melanoma Recognition. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Oct 1;155(10):1135-1141. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1735.

    PMID: 31411641BACKGROUND
  • Wiese S, Elson L, Reichert F, Mambo B, Feldmeier H. Prevalence, intensity and risk factors of tungiasis in Kilifi County, Kenya: I. Results from a community-based study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 9;11(10):e0005925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005925. eCollection 2017 Oct.

    PMID: 28991909BACKGROUND
  • Wangara F, Kipruto H, Ngesa O, Kayima J, Masini E, Sitienei J, Ngari F. The spatial epidemiology of leprosy in Kenya: A retrospective study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Apr 22;13(4):e0007329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007329. eCollection 2019 Apr.

    PMID: 31009481BACKGROUND
  • van Dijk NJ, Amer S, Mwiti D, Schallig HDFH, Augustijn EW. An epidemiological and spatiotemporal analysis of visceral leishmaniasis in West Pokot, Kenya, between 2018 and 2022. BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):1169. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10053-4.

    PMID: 39415090BACKGROUND
  • Simundic AM. Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11. eCollection 2009 Jan.

    PMID: 27683318BACKGROUND
  • Shetty VP, Pandya SS, Arora S, Capadia GD. Observations from a 'special selective drive' conducted under National Leprosy Elimination Programme in Karjat taluka and Gadchiroli district of Maharashtra. Indian J Lepr. 2009 Oct-Dec;81(4):189-93.

    PMID: 20704074BACKGROUND
  • Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Takaoka R, Ahogo KC, Belachew WA, Brown SJ, Correia JC, Correia M, Degboe B, Dorizy-Vuong V, Faye O, Fuller LC, Grando K, Hsu C, Kayitenkore K, Lunjani N, Ly F, Mahamadou G, Manuel RCF, Kebe Dia M, Masenga EJ, Muteba Baseke C, Ouedraogo AN, Rapelanoro Rabenja F, Su J, Teclessou JN, Todd G, Taieb A. Position Statement on Atopic Dermatitis in Sub-Saharan Africa: current status and roadmap. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Nov;33(11):2019-2028. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15972.

    PMID: 31713914BACKGROUND
  • Schmeller W, Dzikus A. Skin diseases in children in rural Kenya: long-term results of a dermatology project within the primary health care system. Br J Dermatol. 2001 Jan;144(1):118-24.

    PMID: 11167692BACKGROUND
  • Salinas MP, Sepulveda J, Hidalgo L, Peirano D, Morel M, Uribe P, Rotemberg V, Briones J, Mery D, Navarrete-Dechent C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis. NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 14;7(1):125. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01103-x.

    PMID: 38744955BACKGROUND
  • Roberts W, Lyson H, Speer C, Tovar E, Paz E, Zimlichman E. Cost Savings and Improved Clinical Outcomes From a Mobile Health Cardiovascular Disease Self-Management Program. Value Health. 2025 Feb 13:S1098-3015(25)00068-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.025. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 39954854BACKGROUND
  • Patel RH, Foltz EA, Witkowski A, Ludzik J. Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Based Approaches Applied to Non-Invasive Imaging for Early Detection of Melanoma: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 23;15(19):4694. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194694.

    PMID: 37835388BACKGROUND
  • Ouma FF, Mulambalah CS. Persistence and Changing Distribution of Leishmaniases in Kenya Require a Paradigm Shift. J Parasitol Res. 2021 Oct 18;2021:9989581. doi: 10.1155/2021/9989581. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34707907BACKGROUND
  • Ofire MO, Omanje V, Sempele I, Chami I, Gitahi PN, Njenga SM, Omondi WP. Lymphatic filariasis elimination in Kenya: Tracing the journey from 2002-2024 and pathways to achieving 2030 target. Int J Infect Dis. 2025 Mar;152:107839. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107839. Epub 2025 Feb 8.

    PMID: 39929320BACKGROUND
  • Odiwuor S, Muia A, Magiri C, Maes I, Kirigi G, Dujardin JC, Wasunna M, Mbuchi M, Auwera GV. Identification of Leishmania tropica from micro-foci of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Kenyan Rift Valley. Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Jul;106(3):159-65. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000015.

    PMID: 23265373BACKGROUND
  • Ochola EA, Karanja DMS, Elliott SJ. The impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) on health and wellbeing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A case study of Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Feb 11;15(2):e0009131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009131. eCollection 2021 Feb.

    PMID: 33571200BACKGROUND
  • Nyangacha RM, Odongo D, Oyieke F, Bii C, Muniu E, Chasia S, Ochwoto M. Spatial distribution, prevalence and potential risk factors of Tungiasis in Vihiga County, Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Mar 12;13(3):e0007244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007244. eCollection 2019 Mar.

    PMID: 30860992BACKGROUND
  • Nsagha DS, Bamgboye EA, Oyediran AB. Childhood leprosy in Essimbiland of Cameroon: results of chart review and school survey. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2009 Sep-Dec;19(4):214-9.

    PMID: 20836334BACKGROUND
  • Njenga SM, Kanyi HM, Mutungi FM, Okoyo C, Matendechero HS, Pullan RL, Halliday KE, Brooker SJ, Wamae CN, Onsongo JK, Won KY. Assessment of lymphatic filariasis prior to re-starting mass drug administration campaigns in coastal Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2017 Feb 22;10(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2044-5.

    PMID: 28228160BACKGROUND
  • Ngere I, Gufu Boru W, Isack A, Muiruri J, Obonyo M, Matendechero S, Gura Z. Burden and risk factors of cutaneous leishmaniasis in a peri-urban settlement in Kenya, 2016. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 23;15(1):e0227697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227697. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 31971945BACKGROUND
  • Msyamboza KP, Mawaya LR, Kubwalo HW, Ng'oma D, Liabunya M, Manjolo S, Msiska PP, Somba WW. Burden of leprosy in Malawi: community camp-based cross-sectional study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2012 Aug 6;12:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-12-12.

    PMID: 22867526BACKGROUND
  • Mieras LF, Taal AT, Post EB, Ndeve AGZ, van Hees CLM. The Development of a Mobile Application to Support Peripheral Health Workers to Diagnose and Treat People with Skin Diseases in Resource-Poor Settings. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 15;3(3):102. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3030102.

    PMID: 30274498BACKGROUND
  • Irwig L, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Gatsonis C, Lijmer J. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):669-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.669. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11895830BACKGROUND
  • Hotez PJ, Kamath A. Neglected tropical diseases in sub-saharan Africa: review of their prevalence, distribution, and disease burden. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Aug 25;3(8):e412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000412.

    PMID: 19707588BACKGROUND
  • Gitari JW, Nzou SM, Wamunyokoli F, Kinyeru E, Fujii Y, Kaneko S, Mwau M. Leishmaniasis recidivans by Leishmania tropica in Central Rift Valley Region in Kenya. Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Sep;74:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

    PMID: 30017946BACKGROUND
  • Elson L, Wiese S, Feldmeier H, Fillinger U. Prevalence, intensity and risk factors of tungiasis in Kilifi County, Kenya II: Results from a school-based observational study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 May 16;13(5):e0007326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007326. eCollection 2019 May.

    PMID: 31095558BACKGROUND
  • Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2401-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25490331BACKGROUND
  • Daneshjou R, He B, Ouyang D, Zou JY. How to evaluate deep learning for cancer diagnostics - factors and recommendations. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021 Apr;1875(2):188515. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188515. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

    PMID: 33513392BACKGROUND
  • Colom MF, Ferrer C, Ekai JL, Ferrandez D, Ramirez L, Gomez-Sanchez N, Leting S, Hernandez C. First report on mycetoma in Turkana County-North-western Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Aug 14;17(8):e0011327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011327. eCollection 2023 Aug.

    PMID: 37578968BACKGROUND
  • Cameron HM, Gatei D, Bremner AD. The deep mycoses in Kenya: A histopathological study. 1. Mycetoma. East Afr Med J. 1973 Aug;50(8):382-95. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4761208BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Skin and Connective Tissue DiseasesNeglected DiseasesLeprosyBuruli UlcerLeishmaniasis, CutaneousScabiesMycetomaElephantiasis, FilarialOnchocerciasisTungiasisYawsElephantiasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousMycobacterium InfectionsActinomycetales InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesInfectionsSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesLeishmaniasisEuglenozoa InfectionsProtozoan InfectionsParasitic DiseasesSkin Diseases, ParasiticVector Borne DiseasesSkin Diseases, InfectiousMite InfestationsEctoparasitic InfestationsNocardia InfectionsSkin Diseases, BacterialDermatomycosesMycosesFilariasisSpirurida InfectionsSecernentea InfectionsNematode InfectionsHelminthiasisMosquito-Borne DiseasesLymphedemaLymphatic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesFlea InfestationsTreponemal InfectionsSpirochaetales InfectionsGram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Study Officials

  • Gustavo H Penaloza, PhD

    Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM)

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Carla Rodríguez Cuesta, MEng

    SHERWOOD HEALTHCARE SENEGAL SARL

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Maurice R Odiere, PhD

CONTACT

Ruth M Nyangacha, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The SkincAIr Research App is evaluated across two non-randomized arms: (1) Clinical Image Data Collection - dermatologists in 5 countries use the Dermatologist Dataset eCRF to collect and annotate \>3,500 skin NTD images over 36 months; (2) Validation Study - 150 FHWs (50 per country, Kenya, Ethiopia, Senegal) serve as their own control across 3 consecutive phases: Phase A (12 months baseline, no AI); Phase B (6 months, AI app activated); Phase C (6 months, AI withdrawn to assess skill retention). \~750 patients enrolled per country.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Research Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2026

First Posted

April 2, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2030

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymised clinical images and metadata collected via the Dermatologist Dataset eCRF will be made publicly available as an open dataset following project completion (M60). Individual participant data from the validation study will be available to researchers upon reasonable request, subject to data sharing agreements and ethics committee approval. Data will be stored on AWS eu-west-1 for 10 years post-study.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Beginning 12 months after study completion (M60), available for 10 years
Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a data access request. Access granted subject to signing a data sharing agreement compliant with GDPR and national data protection laws of participating countries.
More information

Locations