Efficacy of a Prediction Model-based Algorithm to PREVENT Drug-induced Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson's Disease
PREVENT-ICD
2 other identifiers
interventional
528
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Impulse control disorders and related behaviors (ICDRBs) are characterized by pathological gambling, compulsive shopping or eating, and hypersexuality, but other related behaviors have been described, e.g. hobbyism, and punding. ICDRBs are frequent in Parkinson's Disease (PD), affecting up to 50% of the patients after 5 years with major medical, social, and legal impact, with life changing consequences for patients and caregivers. The main risk factor is dopaminergic therapy, particularly the cumulative dose of dopamine agonists (DA). On the other hand, the dopaminergic therapy is necessary to control motor symptoms, and DA have demonstrated efficacy in delaying motor complications occurring in PD. Ideally, dopaminergic therapy would have to be adjusted to the individual risk of developing ICRDBs to maximize the benefit/risk ratio of each drug. However, despite several clinical risk factors associated with the risk of ICDRBs (in addition to the dopaminergic therapy), it is still not possible to predict their risk at the individual level, and not every patient treated with dopaminergic medications will develop ICDRBs. A machine learning algorithm to predict ICDRBs, based on clinical data, validated by cross-validation on independent replication cohorts has been developed. The PREVENT-ICD study proposes to test the efficacy of a new application, ICD-Shield, based on an algorithm to predict and prevent ICDs,in a multicenter randomized controlled trial to prevent ICDRBs in PD patients by proposing to the clinician treatment adjustment according to the risk predicted by the algorithm, as compared to the standard of care (SoC)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jul 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2031
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2031
June 12, 2026
March 1, 2026
4.9 years
March 26, 2026
June 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of patients with at least one clinically significant ICDRBs, i.e mild or above (any ASBPD score at 2 or above in any of the subcategories 3 to 5 and 7 to 10 of part IV) over the 3 year-follow up.
ICDRBs will be screened for, every 6 months, with the internationally validated Ardouin Scale of Behavior in PD (ASBPD), according to scoring instructions, by a neuropsychologist or the neurologist trained for the scale. The diagnosis of a clinically significant ICDRB (MILD or above) relies on part IV of the ASBPD, hyperdopaminergic behaviors, for patients who score at 2 or above in any of the subcategories 3 to 5 and 7 to 10
over 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (23)
Perception of global disease severity by the patient
over 3 years
Perception of global disease severity by the clinician
over 3 years
Time to onset of first occurrence of clinically significant ICDRBs
over 3 years
Global severity of ICDRBs at time of first occurrence on the QUIP-RS score
over 3 years
Highest severity of ICDRBs at time of first occurrence on the ASBPD score
over 3 years
- +18 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (15)
Cumulative severity of ICDRBs
over 3 years
Subtypes of ICDRBs
over 3 years
Patient quality of life
over 3 years
- +12 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Algorithm-guided group
EXPERIMENTALIn the (algorithm-guided arm) the patient treatment will be adapted by the neurologist based on the algorithm output.
Standard of Care (SoC) group
OTHERIn the SoC arm the patient treatment will be adapted by the neurologist based only on their clinical appreciation and international guidelines.
Interventions
After the evaluation of the patient and the clinical inputs entered in the ICD SHIELD app including the planned choice of prescription by the neurologist for the next period, the clinician will receive the therapeutic approach recommended by the ICD SHIELD app depending on the output given by the algorithm. The clinician can repeat the use of the app if he/she plans to try various choice of prescription in the app if deemed necessary, but a single use is recommended at each visit. The neurologist will have to follow the recommendation of the ICD SHIELD app as much as possible unless judged inappropriate. The neurologist makes the final decision.
In the SoC arm the patient treatment will be adapted by the neurologistbased only on their clinical appreciation and international guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female ≥ 18 years old
- Diagnosis of PD according to the 2015 Movement Disorders Society criteria (Postuma et al., Mov Disord. 2015), with bradykinesia AND at least ONE of the following: muscular rigidity, or resting tremor; with no other suspected cause of parkinsonism
- Disease duration below 6 years included
- No ongoing clinically significant (Mild or above) ICDRBs (any ASBPD part IV subscores in any of the items 3 to 5 and 7 to 10 each \<2)
- Patients currently treated with DA for at least 2 months and without current planned or known reason for stopping DA over the next 3 years
You may not qualify if:
- Atypical or secondary parkinsonism such as supranuclear palsy, multisystem atrophy or drug-induced parkinsonism, etc...
- Patients with a cognitive or psychiatric disorder preventing patient's participation as per investigator's judgement
- Not willing to participate to the Clinical Investigation or to sign the consent
- Pregnant or lactating woman, or WOCBP tested positive in \<serum or urine\> pregnancy test
- Participation in investigational drug trials within 30 days prior to screening or within 5 half-life of investigational product whatever the longest
- Participant not affiliated or beneficiary of a French social security system
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Parislead
- NS-PARK Networkcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Louise-Laure Mariani
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2026
First Posted
April 1, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2031
Last Updated
June 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodological sound proposal, with clearly identified processing purposes and subject to compliance with applicable regulations (CNIL, GDPR)
Data are available upon reasonable request to the Coordinating Principal Investigator/Corresponding author, and according to local regulations and depending on futur use of the medical device in case of CE mark and commercialization. The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.