Comparative Study Between Using Combined Propofol Sedation With subTenon's Infusion as Local Anaesthsia to the Eye Versus General Anesthesia for Strabismus Surgery in Adults

NCT07504354 | Not Yet Recruiting DMC

• 1 other identifier: Soh-med-25-9----3PD
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 60
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

in this study investigators compare two type of anesthetic technique for squint surgery in adult patient first is general anesthesia versus local anesthesia using subtenon injection of local anesthetic. comparing patient and surgeon satisfaction in each group

Conditions

Squint Anaesthesia

Keywords

subtenon injection versus general anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• patient satisfaction in combined propofol/sub-Tenon's anaesthesia in unilateral or bilateral strabismus surgery according to scale from 1 to 10 a one not satisfied and 10 completely satisfied

  12 hour after the end of the operation

Study Arms (2)

study group : subtenon injection of local anesthetic with propofol sedation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure: sedation with subtenon injection of local anesthetic

controle group : patient receive general anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure: General Anesthesia (control group)

Interventions

sedation with subtenon injection of local anesthetic PROCEDURE

sedation was induced with fentanyl a loading dose of propofol, followed by continuous infusion of propofol, 3-6 mg/k/h to deep sedation. A nasal tube was inserted to prevent airway obstruction. SubTenon's anaesthesia included "standard" solution is a mixture of 2% plain lignocaine, 0.5% plain bupivacaine, and 150 iu hyaluronidase 0.5%.

study group : subtenon injection of local anesthetic with propofol sedation

General Anesthesia (control group) PROCEDURE

General anaesthesia consisted of premedication with midazolam, followed by fentanyl, cis atracrium, propofol, and tracheal intubation

controle group : patient receive general anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• horizontal or cyclovertical strabismus

You may not qualify if:

• previous EOM surgery, retinal detachment, or filter operation. Patients with ocular or neurological problems, mental retardation, deafness, or dementia

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Sohag University: lead

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia, General; Control Groups

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia; Anesthesia and Analgesia; Epidemiologic Research Design; Epidemiologic Methods; Investigative Techniques; Research Design; Methods

Central Study Contacts

waleed Ahmed, lecturer

CONTACT

00201006392210; waleidadel8514@gmail.com

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Purpose: SUPPORTIVE CARE
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: lecturer of anaesthesia and intensive care

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 25, 2026
• First Posted: March 31, 2026
• Study Start: March 10, 2026
• Primary Completion (Estimated): May 1, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): June 10, 2026
• Last Updated: March 31, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share