Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia in Pulsed-Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
SEDATE-PFA
1 other identifier
interventional
224
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of conscious sedation and general anesthesia in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing their first pulsed-field ablation (PFA) procedure. It will also establish a scalable conscious sedation protocol for PFA. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Does conscious sedation reduce the incidence of the composite safety endpoint (persistent hypotension or hypoxemia for more than 60 seconds intraoperatively) compared with general anesthesia?
- 2.What are the differences in perioperative indicators and adverse events between the two anesthetic strategies in PFA for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation? Researchers will randomly assign eligible patients to a conscious sedation group or a general anesthesia group at a 1:1 ratio to compare the safety and efficacy of the two anesthetic approaches.
- 3.Receive the assigned anesthetic strategy combined with standardized PFA procedure
- 4.Complete intraoperative vital sign and related index monitoring
- 5.Undergo follow-up visits at 12-24 hours, 30 days and 90 days after surgery for relevant index assessment and adverse event recording
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2027
April 21, 2026
April 1, 2026
8 months
March 19, 2026
April 14, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary outcome
persistent systolic blood pressure \<85 mmHg for more than 60 seconds, or persistent hypoxemia (SpO₂ \<85%) for more than 60 seconds.
During procedure
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Individual components of the primary composite endpoint
During procedure
The number of occurrences of each component of the primary outcome
During procedure
Sedation difficulty score
During procedure
Total procedure time
During procedure
Left atrial dwell time
During procedure
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
conscious sedation group
EXPERIMENTALA conscious sedation regimen based on remimazolam combined with fentanyl, plus lidocaine for antitussive therapy, administered by electrophysiologists.
General anesthesia group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe general anesthesia group adopted a standardized general anesthesia process of remimazolam + sufentanil + rocuronium for anesthesia induction, and remimazolam + remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance.
Interventions
Medications: Remimazolam toluenesulfonate injection (25 mg) + Fentanyl citrate injection (0.1 mg) + Lidocaine (100 mg). Administration method: Remimazolam: 2 vials mixed with 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection to prepare a solution with a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The target Bispectral Index (BIS) is 60-80, and the infusion rate of remimazolam is adjusted according to the BIS and patient responses. Fentanyl citrate: 5 vials mixed with 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection to prepare a solution with a concentration of 0.01 mg/mL. Dose reduction and slower injection rate are required for patients with hepatic/renal insufficiency, obesity, or elderly/weak conditions.
After femoral vein puncture, anesthesia induction was performed with remimazolam (0.2-0.3 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.3-0.4 μg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) following standard monitoring and preoxygenation. A laryngeal mask airway was inserted upon loss of consciousness and adequate muscle relaxation, with lung-protective mechanical ventilation applied at tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg, respiratory rate 10-14 breaths/min, I:E 1:2, FiO₂ 60% and fresh gas flow 2-3 L/min to maintain PaCO₂ at 35-45 cmH₂O. Anesthesia was maintained with continuous intravenous ciprofol (0.4-1 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.1-0.2 μg/kg/min) to keep BIS 60-80 and MAP \>70 mmHg, with vasoactive agents as needed. Anesthetics were discontinued before surgery end; the laryngeal mask airway was removed after the patient regained consciousness with satisfactory spontaneous breathing, and antagonistic drugs were used if necessary.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 to 80 years
- Diagnosed with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
- No prior history of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter
- Scheduled to undergo pulsed-field ablation
- Provide written informed consent for study participation and be able to complete all scheduled follow-up assessments
You may not qualify if:
- Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS)
- Complicated with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma or other respiratory system diseases
- Body mass index (BMI) \>30 kg/m² or \<20 kg/m²
- Preoperative pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂) \<93%
- Anticipated difficult airway
- Intolerance to general anesthesia (American Society of Anesthesiologists \[ASA\] physical status ≥Ⅳ)
- Current left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% or New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class Ⅲ-Ⅳ
- Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months
- Within 3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or other cardiac/vascular surgeries
- Moderate/severe stenosis or severe regurgitation of aortic or mitral valve
- Acute cerebrovascular disease within 1 month
- Severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh Class C)
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<45 mL/min/1.73m² or on dialysis
- History of chronic heavy alcohol consumption
- History of substance abuse
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100029, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ning Zhou
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2026
First Posted
April 21, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share