Tele-Rehabilitation vs Conventional Rehabilitation for Cognitive Improvement in Stroke Survivors.
Comparison Of Tele-Rehabilitation Versus Conventional Rehabilitation To Improve Cognition Among Stroke Survivor.
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to:
- Compare tele-rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation for cognitive improvement after stroke.
- Evaluate changes in cognitive function using standardized assessment tools.
- Determine whether tele-rehabilitation is as effective as conventional therapy.
- Improve evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for stroke survivors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2026
March 31, 2026
March 1, 2026
4 months
March 16, 2026
March 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Cognitive Function Measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to assess global cognitive function, including attention, memory, executive function, language, and visuospatial abilities. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
Baseline
Change in Cognitive Function Measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to assess global cognitive function, including attention, memory, executive function, language, and visuospatial abilities. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
After 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Executive Function Measured by stroop Test
Baseline
Change in Executive Function Measured by stroop Test
After 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Tele-Rehabilitation Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive structured cognitive rehabilitation remotely through telecommunication platforms for 8 weeks. Sessions will be conducted with comparable frequency and intensity to the control group.
Conventional Rehabilitation Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive face-to-face cognitive rehabilitation sessions in a clinical setting for 8 weeks with similar frequency and duration as the tele-rehabilitation group.
Interventions
Cognitive rehabilitation exercises delivered remotely using video-based sessions, targeting attention, memory, executive function, and processing speed. Sessions will be conducted over 8 weeks.
In-person cognitive rehabilitation exercises targeting attention, memory, executive function, and processing speed delivered in a clinical setting for 8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults with age 50-80
- Diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within subacute to chronic phase.
- Moca Score 10-25 score atleast
- For tele-rehab must accessible to a digital device.
You may not qualify if:
- History of neurodegenerative disorder e.g Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease
- Severe Cognitive Impairment
- Lack of access to or inability to use a digital device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah International University
Islamabad, Punjab Province, 44000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Imran Amjad, Phd
Riphah International University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the rehabilitation interventions, neither participants nor therapists will be blinded to group allocation. Outcome assessments will be conducted without blinding.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2026
First Posted
March 31, 2026
Study Start
March 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Last Updated
March 31, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share