Procedural Framing and Epidural Steroid Injection Outcomes
PROFESS
The Effect of Procedural Framing on Epidural Steroid Injection Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
210
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Back pain is the leading cause of disability and military medical boards across the globe. Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are the most commonly performed pain procedure in the world. There is strong evidence that the placebo effect for all pain treatments, including ESI, is greater than the intrinsic effect. The placebo effect is highly dependent on a patient's 'expectations', and therefore how the procedure is framed. This study aims to compare ESI when the procedure is framed very positively- as is often done in clinical practice vs. more neutrally (which is less commonly done in clinical practice but consistent with evidence). The placebo effect is also stronger for procedures than medications. The evidence on the benefits of ESI is highly dependent on whether it is compiled by interventional doctors who perform the procedure or non-interventional researchers. In order to determine how 'framing' a treatment affects pain outcomes, the investigative team will conduct a 3-arm randomized trial comparing positive framing of ESI, neutral framing of ESI, and medications, in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 25, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2028
May 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
2 years
March 23, 2026
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean reduction in average leg pain
Mean reduction in average leg pain on a 0-10 numerical rating pain scale over the past week. This is the study's primary endpoint. 0=no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Leg pain at rest
Up to 15 minutes after the procedure
Leg pain with activity
Up to 15 minutes after the procedure
Back pain at rest
Up to 15 minutes after the procedure
Back pain with activity
Up to 15 minutes after the procedure
Patient satisfaction
Up to 15 minutes after the procedure
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Adverse events
10-15 minutes (for ESI)
Adverse events
4 weeks
Adverse events
12 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Positive framing- ESI
EXPERIMENTALPatients will review around 5 slides detailing ESI in a very positive light and references, with study personnel available to answer questions.
Neutral framing- ESI
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients will review 1 slide that portrays ESI in a neutral light.
Pharmacotherapy with gabapentin, nortriptyline and/or duloxetine
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients will review 1 slide that portrays adjuvant medications for neuropathic pain in a neutral light.
Interventions
5-slide summary of ESI portrayed in a positive light, accompanied by a study investigator.
1-slide summary of ESI portrayed in a neutral light.
1-slide summary of medications for neuropathic pain portrayed in a neutral light.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18
- Lumbosacral radicular pain based on history and physical exam (e.g. pain radiating into one or both lower extremities, sensory loss, muscle weakness, positive straight leg raising test etc.)
- Duration of pain \>6 weeks
- NRS leg pain score \> 4 (or if 3/10, greater or equal to back pain)
- MRI evidence of spinal pathology consistent with symptoms
- Candidates for ESI and pharmacotherapy
You may not qualify if:
- Untreated coagulopathy
- Previous spine surgery
- No MRI or non-concordant MRI study
- Leg pain \> 15 years duration
- Epidural steroid injection within past 2 years
- Signs or symptoms of cauda equina syndrome
- Previous failed trials with gabapentin and pregabalin and tricyclic antidepressants and duloxetine
- Allergic reactions to contrast dye prohibiting injection (e.g., tranforaminal ESI), gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or duloxetine, and contraindications to all of the above medications
- Referrals from surgery for diagnostic injections for surgical evaluation
- Serious medical (e.g. congestive heart failure) or psychiatric (untreated depression) condition that might preclude optimal outcome
- Pregnancy
- Inability to understand basic English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwestern Universitylead
- Phramongkutklao College of Medicine and Hospitalcollaborator
- Ramathibodi Hospitalcollaborator
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
Related Publications (5)
Schmidt S, Loef M, Ostermann T, Walach H. Treatment effects in pharmacological clinical randomized controlled trials are mainly due to placebo. J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Mar;179:111658. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111658. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
PMID: 39733973BACKGROUNDKaptchuk TJ, Stason WB, Davis RB, Legedza AR, Schnyer RN, Kerr CE, Stone DA, Nam BH, Kirsch I, Goldman RH. Sham device v inert pill: randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments. BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):391-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38726.603310.55. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
PMID: 16452103BACKGROUNDSebastian A, Wyld L, Morgan JL. Examining the variation in consent in general surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Feb;106(2):140-149. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0020. Epub 2023 May 23.
PMID: 37218649BACKGROUNDKern A, Kramm C, Witt CM, Barth J. The influence of personality traits on the placebo/nocebo response: A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2020 Jan;128:109866. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109866. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
PMID: 31760341BACKGROUNDKang H, Miksche MS, Ellingsen DM. Association between personality traits and placebo effects: a preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2023 Mar 1;164(3):494-508. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002753. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
PMID: 35947877BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven P Cohen, MD
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2026
First Posted
March 27, 2026
Study Start
March 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 25, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2028
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04