Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Improve Interventional Outcomes for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy?
Does MRI Improve Interventional Outcomes for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy? A Randomized Study Comparing Epidural Steroid Injections Based on Clinical Findings Alone, or Clinical Findings and MRI
1 other identifier
interventional
131
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are the most frequently performed procedures in pain clinics. When performing ESI, there is no consensus about how to best select candidates for this intervention, and which level(s) to inject. Some experts advocate basing the injection level on MRI findings, whereas others recommend clinical symptoms. In order to determine whether MRI is necessary before referring patients with chronic LBP radiating into the leg(s) for pain management interventions, we will perform a randomized comparative study involving 131 patients with chronic low back and leg pain who are clinically candidates for epidural steroid injections into two groups. Group I will receive two ESI based solely on historical and physical exam (PE) findings. Group II will receive treatment only after MRI is reviewed. The investigators' hypothesis is that MRI will not have a significant effect on treatment outcome, and will have minimal impact on patient care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2011
CompletedJune 23, 2011
January 1, 2009
2.1 years
January 20, 2009
June 22, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in numerical rating leg pain score
1 month after 2nd epidural injection
Secondary Outcomes (5)
change in numerical rating back pain score
1 month after 2nd epidural injection
change in numerical rating scale leg pain score
3 months after 2nd epidural steroid injection
Change in numerical rating scale back pain score
3 months after 2nd epidural steroid injection
Change in Oswestry disability index
1 month after 2nd epidural steroid injection
Change in Oswestry disability index
3 months after 2nd epidural steroid injection
Study Arms (2)
I
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwo epidural steroid injections two weeks apart based on history and physical exam alone
II
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwo epidural steroid injections two weeks apart based on history, physical exam and MRI
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18
- Candidates for ESI based on history and physical exam
- NRS pain score \> 4
- Leg pain \> back pain
- Patients already have an MRI
You may not qualify if:
- Untreated coagulopathy
- Previous spine surgery
- Leg pain \> 4 years duration
- Epidural steroid injection within past 2 years
- Serious (e.g., bowel or bladder incontinence, loss of reflexes) or progressive neurological deficit
- Referrals from surgery diagnostic injections for surgical evaluation
- Serious medical (e.g. congestive heart failure) or psychiatric (untreated depression) condition that might preclude optimal outcome
- Pregnancy
- Serious underlying pathology (e.g., vertebral fracture, spinal infection or metastases), as determined by an independent reviewer (group I) or the treating physician (group II) on MRI. The investigator and injector for group I patients will remain blinded to this review except to know that serious pathology was ruled out.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- Walter Reed Army Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307, United States
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Related Publications (5)
Kendrick D, Fielding K, Bentley E, Kerslake R, Miller P, Pringle M. Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):400-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7283.400.
PMID: 11179160BACKGROUNDGilbert FJ, Grant AM, Gillan MG, Vale LD, Campbell MK, Scott NW, Knight DJ, Wardlaw D; Scottish Back Trial Group. Low back pain: influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome--multicenter randomized trial. Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):343-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2312030886. Epub 2004 Mar 18.
PMID: 15031430BACKGROUNDModic MT, Obuchowski NA, Ross JS, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Grooff PN, Mazanec DJ, Benzel EC. Acute low back pain and radiculopathy: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome. Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):597-604. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2372041509.
PMID: 16244269BACKGROUNDCohen SP, Argoff CE, Carragee EJ. Management of low back pain. BMJ. 2008 Dec 22;337:a2718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2718. No abstract available.
PMID: 19103627BACKGROUNDCohen SP, Gupta A, Strassels SA, Christo PJ, Erdek MA, Griffith SR, Kurihara C, Buckenmaier CC 3rd, Cornblath D, Vu TN. Effect of MRI on treatment results or decision making in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy referred for epidural steroid injections: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 23;172(2):134-42. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.593. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
PMID: 22157067DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven P Cohen, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2009
First Posted
January 21, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 23, 2011
Record last verified: 2009-01