Manual- VS Auto-Strain
Automated Measurements of Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain: Are the Results Comparable to Manual Measurements During Cardiac Surgery?
1 other identifier
observational
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Myocardial strain analysis provides additional and valuable information about left ventricular function, particularly in the perioperative setting with its dynamic changes in ventricular load conditions. This allows for earlier risk assessment and, if necessary, the initiation of faster and more targeted therapy. Unfortunately, conventional strain analysis using conventional methods currently takes approximately 5 minutes. However, this amount of time is often not available in a dynamically changing intraoperative setting during cardiac surgery. Therefore, the benefits of strain analysis have not yet been routinely utilized during the intraoperative course. However, new software solutions exist that can perform strain analysis fully automatically and reduce the examination time to a few seconds. However, it remains unclear whether these fully automated analyses also function reliably intraoperatively using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of these new methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 23, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 23, 2027
March 27, 2026
March 1, 2026
1 year
March 22, 2026
March 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correlation between conventionally measured global longitudinal strain (GLS) and fully automated global longitudinal strain (Auto-GLS)
1-3 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Correlation between fully automated global longitudinal strain measured using GE EchoPac (GE-Auto-GLS) and fully automated global longitudinal strain measured using TOMTEC AutoStrain (TOMTEC Auto-GLS)
1 day
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing cardiac surgery who are monitored with a transesophageal echocardiography probe
You may qualify if:
- Adult (≥18 years) cardiac surgery patients
- Sinus rhythm
- No severe valvular regurgitation
- Use of General Electric (GE) echocardiography systems (Vivid S60, S70, E95) and corresponding EchoPAC software as well as TOMTEC software.
You may not qualify if:
- Inadequate image quality
- Any severe heart valve regurgitation
- Mechanical circulatory support systems (e.g., LVAD, Impella, ECMO)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bruno Moralead
Study Sites (1)
General Hospital of Vienna - Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2026
First Posted
March 27, 2026
Study Start
March 23, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 23, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 23, 2027
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share