High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia in Cardiac Surgery
Postoperative Recovery After Cardiac Surgery A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND In cardiac surgery, high-dose opioid contributes to adverse events associated with poor postoperative outcomes. There is growing evidence that nerve block-based multi-modal anesthesia protocols may reduce intraoperative opioid consumption without compromising analgesia management and consequently improve patient's early postoperative recovery. OBJECTIVE To determine whether opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block could improve early postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery. DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS Eighty patients aged 45 to 70 years undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. Key exclusion criteria included contraindication to interventions or drugs and a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use. INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block (intervention group) or opioid-based anaesthesia (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72h after surgery, postoperative pain score, the incidence of postoperative adverse events and chronic pain. Other outcomes included endotracheal intubation duration, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 22, 2024
CompletedJuly 30, 2024
July 1, 2024
3 months
May 22, 2024
July 27, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
QoR-15 at 24h
the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery
at 24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
QoR-15 at 72h
QoR-15 at 72 hours after surgery
Number rating score (NRS)
NRS at 24 hours and 72 hours after surgery
postoperative adverse events
during hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 days
chronic pain
at 3 months after surgery
Other Outcomes (3)
Postoperative mechanical ventilation
The time from the end of operation to the removal of tracheal intubation, assessed up to 30 days
hospital length of stay (LOS)
From the date of admission until the date of discharging, assessed up to 30 days
hospital costs
during hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 days
Study Arms (2)
pecto-intercostal fascial block and rectus sheath block-based opioid-sparing anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALhigh-dose opiod traditional anesthesia
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Patients in the OSA group was administrated with 0.5 to 1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and received PIFB combined with RSB after anesthetic induction. Patients in the control group were recommended to receive 2 to 3 mcg·kg-1 opioid-based sufentanil. PIFB was conducted at the T2 to T5 levels under ultrasound guidance. Each side received 20 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone. Bilateral RSB was conducted after the PIFB and the needle was inserted into the plane between the rectus abdominal muscle and its posterior sheath using an in-plane approach. After verifying needle placement, 15 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone was delivered to each side. In the control group, patients received no procedure and were administrated with traditional anesthetic protocol. Patients received continuous intravenous sufentanil (50 to 100 mg) and tropisetron (5 to 10 mg) at 2 ml·h-1 for the first 48 hours after surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female adult patients aged 45 to 70 years, awaiting elective cardiac surgery, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classes II or III were eligible.
You may not qualify if:
- contraindications to punctual or local anesthetic drugs, a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use, and an inability to communicate or refuse to enroll.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fuwai hospital
Beijing, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2024
First Posted
May 31, 2024
Study Start
April 22, 2024
Primary Completion
July 22, 2024
Study Completion
July 22, 2024
Last Updated
July 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data availuable by sending email to corresponding authors