NCT07494682

Brief Summary

This clinical study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two minimally invasive approaches for masking molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) opacities and to evaluate esthetic perceptions of children and their parents. Participants with MIH-affected incisors received either resin infiltration or etch-bleach-seal treatment. Esthetic outcomes and satisfaction levels were assessed using standardized scales.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 6, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 24, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Molar incisor hypomineralizationResin infiltration techniqueEtch bleach seal techniqueMinimally invasive treatmentEsthetic perception

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in esthetic perception of children and parents

    Esthetic perception was assessed using the Child's and Parent's Questionnaire about Teeth Appearance. Changes in physical, psychological, and social domains, as well as satisfaction with tooth appearance, were evaluated before treatment and at 3-month follow-up.

    Baseline and 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Color change of MIH-related anterior enamel opacities

    Baseline, 1 month, 3 months

Study Arms (2)

Resin infiltration

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm received resin infiltration treatment for masking molar incisor hypomineralization-related enamel opacities. The procedure involved etching with hydrochloric acid, ethanol application for dehydration, and application of a low-viscosity resin infiltrant (Icon®, DMG) followed by light curing and polishing in a single clinical session.

Other: Resin infiltration

Etch Bleach Seal Technique

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm received the etch bleach seal technique for masking molar incisor hypomineralization-related enamel opacities. The procedure included phosphoric acid etching, application of sodium hypochlorite for bleaching, and sealing with a resin-based sealant, followed by light curing and polishing in a single clinical session.

Other: Etch Bleach Seal Technique

Interventions

A minimally invasive dental procedure used to mask enamel opacities associated with molar incisor hypomineralization. The technique involves etching the enamel surface, drying with ethanol, and applying a low-viscosity resin infiltrant (Icon®, DMG), followed by light curing and polishing in a single clinical session.

Resin infiltration

A minimally invasive dental procedure used to improve the appearance of enamel opacities associated with molar incisor hypomineralization. The technique includes phosphoric acid etching, application of sodium hypochlorite for bleaching, and sealing with a resin-based sealant, followed by light curing and polishing in a single clinical session.

Etch Bleach Seal Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 10 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 8 and 10 years,
  • Diagnosis of MIH according to the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) criteria \[19\], with at least one permanent incisor exhibiting well-demarcated white-cream and/or yellow-brown enamel opacities causing esthetic concern to the child and/or parents,
  • Absence of urgent dental treatment needs, with completed treatment of posterior teeth,
  • Ability of both children and parents to read and understand Turkish.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of urgent dental treatment or requirement for restorative treatment of MIH affected permanent first molars during the study period,
  • Presence of dental or facial anomalies other than MIH (e.g. hypodontia, cleft lip and/or palate),
  • Presence of dental caries, crown fractures, or extrinsic/intrinsic tooth discolorations that could compromise esthetic perception,
  • Presence of other developmental enamel defects (e.g. enamel hypoplasia, amelogenesis imperfecta, fluorosis, or hypoplasia related to previous dental trauma),
  • Previous restorative treatment, resin infiltration, microabrasion, and/or tooth whitening on the affected incisors,
  • Children and/or parents who were unlikely to attend follow-up visits or were unable to read and understand Turkish.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry , Denizli

Denizli, 20160, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Molar HypomineralizationDental Enamel HypomineralizationTooth Discoloration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Developmental Defects of EnamelTooth AbnormalitiesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Officials

  • Arif Bolaca, Dr

    Pamukkale University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Due to the nature of the clinical procedures, blinding of the operator was not possible. To minimize potential assessment bias, the evaluation of esthetic perception questionnaires completed by children and their parents were performed by another investigator who was blinded group allocation. In addition, children and their parents were not informed about the specific treatment technique applied and informed only that a minimally invasive esthetic procedure would be performed.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assist. Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Posted

March 27, 2026

Study Start

May 6, 2024

Primary Completion

September 24, 2024

Study Completion

December 20, 2024

Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical and privacy considerations, as the study involves pediatric participants. Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with appropriate ethical approval.

Locations