NCT07162077

Brief Summary

Objectives: to compare aesthetic effectiveness of resin infiltration with/without using sodium hypochlorite in managing opacities of MIH on incisors, and to compare parent's satisfaction with results of both application protocols. Methods: Twenty-four teeth with yellow/ brown opacities of MIH, will be diagnosed according to EAPD diagnostic criteria, will be randomly allocated to test or control group. In the test group, the investigators will be applied sodium hypochlorite 5.25% by using cotton wad before treatment, then after the first and second etching cycles (application of the Icon-Etch (ICON® -Etch; DMG, Hamburg, Germany) and Icon-dry (ICON® -Dry; DMG, Hamburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations) as irrigation step and following the third -Etch etching cycle Icon-infiltrant (ICON® -Infiltrant; DMG, Hamburg, Germany) will be applied . In control group, the investigators will be applied the same protocol of test group but without using sodium hypochlorite. The masking efficacy will be analyzed using the Lab System to calculate the color difference (ΔE) between the opacity and the adjacent enamel in Adobe Photoshop 2024. The infiltration proportion of opacity will be measured using Image J software and the infiltrated area will be expressed as a percentage. The satisfaction of the parents with the results of both application protocols will be compared using Likert scale.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Aug 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress64%
Aug 2025Oct 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 25, 2025

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2025

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 9, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

August 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 7, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Masking efficacy

    The masking efficacy will be analyzed using the Lab System to calculate the color difference (ΔE) between the opacity and the adjacent enamel in Adobe Photoshop 2024.

    The masking efficacy will be analyzed on day 1 and (7 - 10) days after day 1

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The satisfaction of the parents

    On day 1 and (7-10) days after

Study Arms (2)

Sodium hypochlorite & ICON

EXPERIMENTAL

Resin infitration ( ICON (DMG, Hamburg, Germany)) and sodium hypochlorite 5.25%

Procedure: Sodium hypochlorite 5.25%

ICON

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Resin infiltration ( ICON (DMG, Hamburg, Germany))

Procedure: ICON resin infiltration Material group in vivo

Interventions

In the test group, the investigators will be applied sodium hypochlorite 5.25% by using cotton wad on the opacity before treatment, then after the first and second etching cycles (application of the Icon-Etch (ICON® -Etch; DMG, Hamburg, Germany) and Icon-dry (ICON® -Dry; DMG, Hamburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations) as irrigation step and following the third -Etch etching cycle Icon-infiltrant (ICON® -Infiltrant; DMG, Hamburg, Germany) will be applied.

Sodium hypochlorite & ICON

In control group, the investigators will be applied the same protocol of test group but without using sodium hypochlorite

ICON

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with MIH-related opacities on the incisal and middle thirds of the buccal surface of their permanent incisors, ac- cording to EAPD diagnostic criteria of (MIH), only isolated lesions will be selected.

You may not qualify if:

  • Teeth with resin composite restorations, previously treated by exter- nal bleaching, micro-abrasion or re-mineralization(fluoride varnish or calcium-based products such asCPP-ACP) will be excluded.
  • Opacities present only on incisors without molar
  • WSLs caused by orthodomtic treatment
  • Teeth affected by dental fluorosis, Amelogenesis imperfecta and Tetracycline-pigmented teeth

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

TishreenU

Latakia, Syria

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Molar Hypomineralization

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental Enamel HypomineralizationDevelopmental Defects of EnamelTooth AbnormalitiesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: teeth will be randomized in two groups (test group and control group)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2025

First Posted

September 9, 2025

Study Start

August 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Locations