Effects of Osteopathic Treatment in Patients With Somatosensory Tinnitus
Osteopathic Treatment Versus Sham in the Discomfort and Magnitude of Patients With Somatosensory Tinnitus
2 other identifiers
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether osteopathic treatment is effective in reducing the discomfort and magnitude of tinnitus symptoms in individuals with somatosensory tinnitus. In addition, the study seeks to investigate whether this approach promotes measurable changes in clinical and audiological outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does osteopathic treatment reduce the intensity and impact of tinnitus perceived by participants?
- Does osteopathic treatment promote changes in audiological and functional measures related to tinnitus? Researchers will compare osteopathic treatment to a sham treatment group to verify if the observed effects are specific to the intervention. Participants will be required to:
- Participate in osteopathic treatment sessions or sham treatment throughout the study period.
- Undergo clinical and audiological assessments before and after the interventions.
- Answer questionnaires related to the perception and impact of tinnitus on quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2026
CompletedMarch 20, 2026
March 1, 2026
3.2 years
February 26, 2026
March 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Questionnaire Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)
The THI is a questionnaire used to measure the degree of annoyance caused by tinnitus. The questionnaire consists of 25 questions divided into three scales: functional, emotional, and catastrophic. There are three possible answers for each question, scored as follows: yes (4 points), sometimes (2 points), and no (no points). Answers are scored from zero, when tinnitus does not interfere with the patient's life, to 100 (points or %), when the degree of annoyance is severe. The sum of the points resulting from the questions is categorized into five groups or degrees of severity. Tinnitus can be: negligible (0-16%), mild (18-36%), moderate (38-56%), severe (58-76%), or catastrophic (78-100%).
Time period: Start of treatment, after 8 weeks (end of treatment), 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Tinnitus Assessment: Pich
Time period: Start of treatment, after 8 weeks (end of treatment).
Tinnitus Assessment: loudness
Evaluation period: Beginning of treatment, after 8 weeks (end of treatment).
Tinnitus Assessment: Masking
Evaluation period: Beginning of treatment, after 8 weeks (end of treatment).
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time period: Start of treatment, after 8 weeks (end of treatment), 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.
Questionnaire Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time period: Start of treatment, after 8 weeks (end of treatment), 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sham treatment is a placebo treatment that simulates osteopathic treatment.
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe sham treatment consisted of applying a placebo that simulated osteopathic treatment. Manual touches were applied to areas of the head, neck, chest, and abdomen for 30 minutes per session. Eight placebo sessions were conducted with a one-week interval between them. The total treatment period was 2 months, and after treatment completion, patients returned at 3 and 6 months for evaluations. Assessment measurements were collected before, after treatments, and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups.
osteopathic treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe researchers employed individually selected manual techniques, based on the type of tissue and region to be treated according to a prior osteopathic assessment. Eight thirty-minute sessions were conducted, with a one-week interval between them. The total treatment period was two months, and after treatment, patients returned at three and six months for evaluations. Evaluative measurements were taken before, after treatment, and at the three- and six-month follow-up appointments.
Interventions
Researchers employ individually selected manual techniques, according to the type of tissue and region to be treated, based on a prior assessment. Functional techniques for: muscles, viscera, membranes, and cranial sutures, bringing the insertions of these tissues closer together to reduce tension. Connective tissue techniques, with sustained and rhythmic stretching, muscle energy, and neuromuscular techniques, working primarily on the fascia and muscles. Impulse techniques (high speed and low amplitude) are used to trigger afferent reflexes, up to the spinal cord or brainstem, depending on the structure being worked on, to improve pain and range of motion in the joints of the cervical and thoracic spine, as well as in the TMJ and ribs. Articular techniques in the cranial sutures, TMJ, and cervical spine, aiming to use rhythmic movements to treat dysfunctions in the articular tissues of the cervical spine, ribs, TMJ, and cranial sutures.
Sham treatment is a placebo simulating osteopathic treatment. Prior patient assessments were conducted to identify somatic dysfunctions. Unlike osteopathic treatment, where the patient was treated directly, sham treatment used manual touches on predetermined areas of the patient's body. The areas where patients presented the main somatic dysfunctions were: head, neck, temporomandibular joint, thorax, and abdomen. The treatment consisted of touches on these areas through a predetermined sequence, lasting a total of thirty minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with unilateral or bilateral tinnitus for at least 6 months;
- Both sexes;
- Age over 18 years;
- Present modulation, that is, perceive changes in the psychoacoustic characteristics of the tinnitus (intensity, frequency and/or location) in response to active and/or resisted maneuvers in one or more regions: cervical spine, upper limbs, TMJ and eyes;
- Tinnitus modulation by activation of muscle trigger points in the regions: skull, cervical spine and upper limbs;
- Patients who did not present modulation, but were classified as having somatosensory tinnitus due to the following symptomatology: recurrent headaches, pain in the cervical or scapular region; temporal coincidence of the onset of tinnitus with musculoskeletal pain; dental manipulation and trauma in the head and neck region; tinnitus due to inadequate postures and/or bruxism for long periods; dysfunction and/or alterations of the cervical spine associated with tinnitus; Patients with and without hearing loss were included.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had undergone physiotherapy and/or manual therapy for pain and tinnitus treatment up to 3 months prior to the initial assessment;
- Severe depression requiring medication;
- Clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia;
- Neurological diseases;
- Contraindications for physiotherapy treatment, such as fractures, tumors;
- Acute rheumatological diseases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05.403-905, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor specializing in Otolaryngology and Otoneurology, PhD in Otolaryngology from USP.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2026
First Posted
March 20, 2026
Study Start
September 2, 2022
Primary Completion
November 7, 2025
Study Completion
November 7, 2025
Last Updated
March 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ICF
- Time Frame
- March 2026 to March 2023
- Access Criteria
- Access criteria for sharing individual patient data will be through direct contact with researcher Alexandre de Mattos Rabello via email: alexandremrabello@yahoo.com.br.
Access criteria for sharing individual patient data will be through direct contact with researcher Alexandre de Mattos Rabello via email: alexandremrabello@yahoo.com.br.