Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Study Start
November 5, 2025
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
March 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
March 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Background Physiotherapists are increasingly expected to act as first-contact practitioners in many healthcare systems. With the growing expansion of direct access to physiotherapy services, clinicians must be able to identify serious medical conditions that require referral to a physician rather than physiotherapeutic treatment. These conditions are commonly described as "Red Flags." Red flag screening refers to the clinical process of identifying signs and symptoms that may indicate serious underlying pathology such as malignancy, fracture, infection, neurological compromise, or cardiovascular disease. Failure to recognize these conditions may delay appropriate medical care and can pose a significant risk to patient safety. Despite the growing responsibility of physiotherapists in primary care settings, research suggests that screening competencies among physiotherapy students and early-career clinicians may vary considerably depending on the structure and emphasis of educational programs. Many physiotherapy curricula still primarily focus on musculoskeletal management, while structured training in clinical screening and differential decision-making remains inconsistently implemented. In response to these developments, international professional organizations such as the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) have published clinical frameworks and recommendations emphasizing the importance of systematic screening in physiotherapy practice. However, empirical research investigating how screening competencies can be effectively developed and assessed during undergraduate physiotherapy education remains limited. This gap in the literature represents an important challenge for physiotherapy education and patient safety. The overarching goal of this PhD project is therefore to investigate whether digitally standardized, video-based training and assessment approaches can improve red flag screening competencies among physiotherapy bachelor students.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
March 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
November 5, 2025
Actual (reported)March 16, 2026
Actual (reported)March 20, 2026
Actual (reported)March 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
March 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Red Flag Screening
Primary Outcome Measure Accuracy of Red Flag Identification The primary outcome of the study is the accuracy with which physiotherapy students identify potentially serious medical conditions (Red Flags) when evaluating standardized video-based clinical cases. Participants are required to classify each case into predefined clinical decision categories: medically critical condition requiring immediate referral, non-critical condition suitable for physiotherapy treatment, or trial treatment with monitoring. Accuracy is determined by comparing student responses with expert-defined reference classifications developed prior to the study. The outcome will be quantified as the percentage of correct classifications across all presented cases.
18 weeks
Red Flag Screening
Primary Outcome Measure Accuracy of Red Flag Identification The primary outcome of the study is the accuracy with which physiotherapy students identify potentially serious medical conditions (Red Flags) when evaluating standardized video-based clinical cases. Participants are required to classify each case into predefined clinical decision categories: medically critical condition requiring immediate referral, non-critical condition suitable for physiotherapy treatment, or trial treatment with monitoring. Accuracy is determined by comparing student responses with expert-defined reference classifications developed prior to the study. The outcome will be quantified as the percentage of correct classifications across all presented cases.
16 weeks
Project Structure The doctoral project consists of two complementary research phases. Phase 1: Multicentric Randomized Longitudinal Study The first phase of the project focuses on the quantitative evaluation of screening competencies among physiotherapy students. Study Design This phase is designed as a multicentric randomized longitudinal study conducted across several universities offering physiotherapy bachelor programs. Participating students evaluate standardized video-based clinical cases that simulate typical patient presentations in physiotherapy practice. The videos represent realistic clinical encounters including patient history, symptom presentation, and elements of physical examination. Students are required to classify each case according to clinical urgency using predefined decision categories
1. Intervention Group - Structured Red Flag Screening Training Participants assigned to the intervention group receive a targeted educational program designed to enhance red flag screening competencies. The intervention consists of a blended learning format combining face-to-face teaching sessions and online modules, focusing on systematic patient screening, structured history taking, and clinical reasoning in the identification of potentially serious medical conditions. Students work with standardized video-based clinical cases that simulate real physiotherapy consultations and require classification of clinical urgency and referral decisions. The training emphasizes application of international screening frameworks and case-based decision making. Participants complete both baseline and post-intervention assessments using new standardized video cases. 2. Control Group - Standard Curriculum Participants assigned to the control group continue with the regular physiotherapy bachelor cur
The intervention is distinguished by the use of digitally standardized, video-based clinical cases that simulate authentic physiotherapy consultations from patient history to elements of clinical examination. Unlike traditional educational interventions that rely mainly on lectures or written case studies, this approach exposes students to dynamic clinical scenarios requiring real-time clinical reasoning and triage decisions. A further distinguishing feature is the integration of training and competency assessment within the same structured digital framework, enabling objective benchmarking across institutions. The intervention also combines face-to-face teaching, online learning modules, and case-based decision training, creating a blended-learning environment specifically designed to strengthen red flag screening skills. Additionally, the project links quantitative competency testing with a qualitative investigation of expert reasoning processes, allowing the educational intervention
Paracelsus medical university
Salzburg, 5020, Austria
First Submitted
March 16, 2026
First Posted
March 20, 2026
Study Start
November 5, 2025
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
March 2027
EstimatedRegistry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Planned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
March 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Last Updated
October 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-10
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: