Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Interscalene and Suprascapular Blocks Used in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Comparison of the Analgesic Effects and Side Effects of Interscalene and Suprascapular Blocks for Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Importance of Postoperative Analgesia in Shoulder Surgery Shoulder surgery is an orthopedic procedure that can be performed either through open surgery or arthroscopically. Pain following shoulder surgery can lead to adverse outcomes such as decreased functional status, increased consumption of narcotic analgesics, and the development of chronic pain. Therefore, achieving optimal postoperative shoulder analgesia is important not only for patient comfort and satisfaction but also for promoting functional recovery, preventing chronic pain, and reducing the need for narcotic analgesics. Additionally, minimizing the side effects associated with nerve block techniques used for analgesia is crucial for the overall success of the treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
March 19, 2026
March 1, 2026
3 years
July 24, 2025
March 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The analgesic efficacy of interscalene block (ISB) and suprascapular block (SSB) will be compared in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.
It is a pain intensity assessment system based on the patient indicating a point between 0 (no pain) and 10 (unbearable pain) to describe their pain level.
the first 48 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The development of chronic pain following interscalene block (ISB) and suprascapular block (SSB) will be compared in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.
3 months postoperatively
Other Outcomes (1)
The side effects of interscalene block (ISB) and suprascapular block (SSB) will be compared in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.
the first 48 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Suprascapular block
For Group I, after the patients were positioned in the sitting posture, reference points were identified based on anatomical landmarks, including the scapular spine and the acromion. A linear ultrasound probe (13-6 MHz) was used to guide the procedure, targeting the suprascapular notch. Under sterile conditions, a 22-gauge × 100 mm needle (Braun® Stimuplex) was advanced, and following negative aspiration, 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine was injected.
Interscalene block
For Group II, patients were positioned in the supine or semi-sitting position with the head turned to the contralateral side to facilitate access to the lateral aspect of the neck. Following antiseptic skin preparation, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe (6-13 MHz) was placed transversely on the lateral neck. The C5-C7 nerve roots were identified as hyperechoic structures located between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. Using an in-plane ultrasound-guided approach, a 22-gauge, 50-100 mm nerve block needle was advanced into the interscalene groove. After confirming negative aspiration, 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine was administered around the nerve roots.
Interventions
In the postoperative recovery room, patients with a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score of 4 or higher received 100 mg of intravenous tramadol as rescue analgesia. In addition, both groups routinely received 1 g of intravenous paracetamol every 6 hours during their stay in the ward. During ward follow-up, if the NRS score was 4 or higher, 100 mg of intravenous tramadol was administered as needed.
Eligibility Criteria
Once suitability is confirmed, detailed information about the work programs is provided in glossary and written form. Random grouping (randomization) and work will be specifically approved after being informed before any process.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have provided written informed consent
- Patients over 18 years of age scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy
- Patients classified as ASA I-II
- Patients undergoing general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing shoulder surgery other than arthroscopic procedures (e.g., revision or open surgery)
- Patients with pre-existing respiratory, cardiac, renal, neurological, or hepatic diseases
- Presence of neuropathy affecting the brachial plexus
- Contraindications to peripheral nerve block (e.g., coagulopathy)
- Known allergy to local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Adnan menderesüniversite Hastanesi
Aydin, Efeler, 09010, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Durali BAYKA
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 3 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doktor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2025
First Posted
March 19, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03