Post-Hoc Cost-Utility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) in Posterior Scoliosis Correction Surgery: Evidence From the Egyptian EQ-5D-5L Value Set
1 other identifier
observational
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Posterior scoliosis correction surgery is associated with sever postoperative pain that necessitate high perioperative opioid doses to alleviate pain . Regional anesthesia techniques such as ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block have emerged as promising strategies for improving postoperative analgesia and reducing opioid consumption. This secondary analysis evaluates the cost-utility of ESP block compared with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) alone in patients scheduled for posterior scoliosis correction surgery. The analysis assesses postoperative quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L instrument value sets from Egyptian population alongside healthcare costs within the early postoperative period. The study aims to determine whether ESP block provides improved patient outcomes and represents a cost-effective strategy for perioperative pain management in scoliosis surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2026
CompletedMarch 16, 2026
March 1, 2026
3 months
March 10, 2026
March 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
economic evaluation (cost utility analysis )of anesthesia (ESP block) compared with (TIVA) alone and the resulting consumption of health resources in patients scheduled for scoliosis correction from a healthcare payer pers
To implement an economic evaluation (cost utility analysis) in addition to the evaluation of clinical effects in order to make rational decisions regarding the acceptance of new mode of anesthesia (ESP block) compared with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) alone and the resulting consumption of health resources in patients scheduled for scoliosis correction from a healthcare payer perspective.
2 months
Study Arms (2)
ESP Block Group Group
Patients undergoing posterior scoliosis correction surgery who received ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block in addition to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) as part of multimodal perioperative analgesia. The ESP block was performed under ultrasound guidance prior to surgical incision to provide thoracic paraspinal analgesia
TIVA Control Group
Patients undergoing posterior scoliosis correction surgery who received total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) without erector spinae plane block. Standard perioperative analgesia and anesthetic management were provided according to institutional protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged 12-25 years diagnosed with scoliosis and scheduled for posterior spinal fixation surgery were included in the study. All participants were classified as ASA physical status I-III and underwent surgery under general anesthesia in the operating rooms .
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 12-25 years,
- scheduled for posterior spinal fixation for scoliosis correction.
- ASA physical status I-III,
You may not qualify if:
- ASA status \> III,
- refusal to participate,
- multiple congenital anomalies,
- hypersensitivity or contraindication to study medications,
- and body weight \< 40 kg.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Bank Hospital
Cairo, Katameya Road, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
basma mohamed, master
National bank hospital ,Cairo, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- head of health economics unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2026
First Posted
March 13, 2026
Study Start
October 15, 2025
Primary Completion
January 15, 2026
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
March 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly available. Data will be stored securely at the study institution and may be made available upon reasonable request and with institutional approval.