NCT07470463

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) system (AIMD.1) using de-identified medical images and semi-synthetic patient simulations. The study combines retrospective analysis of existing publicly available image datasets with prospective data collection from licensed clinicians who complete diagnostic evaluation tasks. In the One-Shot Vision Differential Evaluation (OSVDE) stage, clinicians review individual de-identified medical images and generate a ranked list of potential diagnoses based solely on visual features. In the Multi-Step Conversational Non-Inferiority Evaluation (MSCNE) stage, clinicians complete diagnostic assessments using semi-synthetic patient simulations derived from de-identified medical images. Clinician performance will be compared with the AI system on the same diagnostic tasks. Human participants consist solely of licensed clinicians who provide diagnostic responses. Medical images and simulated cases are study materials and are not considered study participants. No identifiable patient data are used, and the AI system is evaluated in an offline research environment and is not used for clinical decision-making or patient care.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
1mo left

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress74%
Mar 2026Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 13, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 19, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 19, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 19, 2026

Last Updated

March 25, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

March 10, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic AccuracyDifferential DiagnosisClinical Decision SupportComputer VisionMedical ImagingMultimodal AIPhysician PerformanceNon-InferiorityDiagnostic Reasoning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Top-1 Diagnostic Accuracy

    Proportion of evaluated cases in which the primary diagnosis generated by the AI Diagnostic System matches the reference (ground truth) diagnosis. Accuracy will be calculated across de-identified medical image cases and semi-synthetic patient simulation cases and compared with clinician performance.

    At completion of diagnostic evaluations (up to 6 months)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Top-5 Diagnostic Accuracy

    At completion of diagnostic evaluations (up to 6 months)

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinician Participants

    At completion of diagnostic evaluations (up to 6 months)

  • Non-Inferiority of AI Diagnostic Accuracy Compared to Clinicians

    At completion of diagnostic evaluations (up to 6 months)

  • Calibration of AI Diagnostic Confidence

    At completion of diagnostic evaluations (up to 6 months)

  • Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and Precision Recall Curve (PRC)

    At completion of diagnostic evaluations (up to 6 months)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Clinician Participants

Licensed clinicians who participate in diagnostic evaluation tasks using de-identified medical images and semi-synthetic patient simulations to assess diagnostic accuracy. Clinicians provide differential diagnoses for benchmark comparison with an AI diagnostic system.

Diagnostic Test: AI Diagnostic System (AIMD.1)

Interventions

AIMD.1 (also known as NollaMD agent) is a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic system designed to generate differential diagnoses based on analysis of medical images and structured clinical information. In this study, the system is evaluated using de-identified medical images and semi-synthetic patient simulations under controlled research conditions. The AI system generates ranked diagnostic outputs and associated confidence scores, which are compared with reference diagnoses and clinician performance metrics. The system is evaluated in an offline research environment. AI outputs are not used for clinical decision-making, patient management, or real-world medical care.

Also known as: Artificial Intelligence Differential Diagnostic System, AI Clinical Decision Support System, AI Conversational Clinical System, NollaMD
Clinician Participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population consists of licensed physicians across multiple medical specialties who participate in diagnostic evaluation tasks using de-identified medical images and semi-synthetic patient simulations. Participants are recruited through professional networks and medical associations. No patients are enrolled in this study.

You may qualify if:

  • Active license in Dermatology, Internal Medicine, Otolaryngology, Gynecology, Orthopedics, Pediatrics, Geriatrics, Emergency Medicine, Ophthalmology, Psychiatry, Endocrinology, Family Medicine, or a closely related specialty
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Ability to complete diagnostic evaluation sessions remotely using a computer or tablet with reliable internet access

You may not qualify if:

  • Loss of active license in an eligible specialty
  • Inability to complete the evaluation session remotely

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nolla Health (Magic Health Inc.)

New York, New York, 10003, United States

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Luis R Soenksen, MSE, PhD

    Nolla Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Luis R Soenksen, MSE, PhD

CONTACT

Sean Geiger, B.S.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
6 Months
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2026

First Posted

March 13, 2026

Study Start

March 19, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 19, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 19, 2026

Last Updated

March 25, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared. The study involves de-identified medical images and anonymous clinician diagnostic responses. Only aggregate summary results (e.g., diagnostic accuracy metrics and statistical analyses) will be reported in publications and presentations.

Locations