Efficacy of Different Disinfection Technologies in Molar Non-Surgical Retreatment
Efficacy of a Multisonic System vs. Conventional Therapy in the Disinfection of Molar Retreatment Cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Post-treatment apical periodontitis is commonly associated with persistent intracanal infection following root canal treatment. Effective disinfection of the complex root canal system during nonsurgical retreatment remains challenging due to anatomical complexities that may harbor microbial biofilms. Conventional retreatment protocols typically involve nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation combined with irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and activation techniques such as Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI). The GentleWave System (GWS) is a minimally invasive irrigation technology designed to enhance tissue dissolution and microbial removal through multisonic energy, advanced fluid dynamics, and negative pressure. Although preliminary studies suggest promising results in root canal disinfection and patient outcomes, high-level clinical evidence comparing GWS with conventional retreatment techniques remains limited, particularly in molar teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis. This randomized clinical study aims to compare the disinfection efficacy of GWS with a conventional nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation protocol combined with PUI in nonsurgical retreatment of molars with post-treatment apical periodontitis. Intracanal bacterial load will be quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and microbial composition will be analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Residual organic debris will be evaluated using the chairside diagnostic device Endocator and facultative bacterial culturing. Postoperative pain levels will also be recorded to assess short-term clinical outcomes. The results of this study will provide clinical evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness, safety, and potential advantages of advanced irrigation technology for root canal disinfection in complex retreatment cases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2027
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2030
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2030
April 8, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.9 years
March 9, 2026
April 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
change of the intracanal Bacterial Load
Change in total bacterial load in the root canal system following disinfection, measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the universal 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial load will be quantified from microbiological samples collected before instrumentation (S1) and after completion of the disinfection protocol (S2) to determine the reduction in bacterial load between the two time points.
During the treatment visit (baseline before instrumentation and immediately after completion of the disinfection protocol).
Root Canal Microbiome Composition
Differences in the prevalence and relative abundance of bacterial taxa in root canal samples before and after disinfection, assessed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) of bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Alpha diversity and beta diversity metrics will be analyzed to compare microbial community structure between treatment groups.
During the treatment visit (baseline before instrumentation and immediately after completion of the disinfection protocol).
Secondary Outcomes (2)
change of the Residual Intracanal Organic Debris Score
During the treatment visit (before instrumentation and immediately after completion of disinfection).
Post-operative Pain
1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 5 days, and 7 days after the treatment visit
Study Arms (2)
GentleWave Disinfection Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants with molars requiring nonsurgical endodontic retreatment will undergo root canal disinfection using the GentleWave System following minimal mechanical instrumentation. Microbiological samples will be collected prior to retreatment and before obturation to evaluate intracanal bacterial load and microbiome composition. Residual organic debris will be assessed using the chairside device Endocator, and postoperative pain will be recorded.
Conventional Rotary Instrumentation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants with molars requiring nonsurgical endodontic retreatment will undergo conventional chemomechanical preparation using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation combined with irrigation using Sodium hypochlorite and activation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation. Microbiological samples will be collected prior to retreatment and before obturation to evaluate intracanal bacterial load and microbiome composition. Residual organic debris will be assessed using the chairside device Endocator, and postoperative pain will be recorded.
Interventions
Minimally invasive root canal disinfection using the GentleWave multisonic irrigation system following minimal instrumentation. The system delivers multisonically activated sodium hypochlorite and EDTA solutions under negative pressure to enhance irrigation dynamics and debris removal within the root canal system during nonsurgical endodontic retreatment.
Conventional nonsurgical endodontic retreatment using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation followed by passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Irrigation is performed using sodium hypochlorite delivered via a side-vented needle and ultrasonically activated irrigation to enhance canal disinfection after mechanical preparation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Molars showing radiographic evidence of post-treatment apical periodontitis: a lesion that exceeds 3 mm in diameter on one or more roots.
- Evidence from periapical and CBCT examination suggests that retreatment is a viable option, i.e., there are low risks of vertical root fracture, no major root canal obstruction, evidence of coronal leakage, and potential improvement on the previous treatment.
- The initial root canal therapy was performed at least 2 years previously, or more than 1 year if the patient has signs and symptoms or symptomatic disease (pain, swelling, or sinus tracts).
- Patients show no chronic systemic disease that may influence the outcome of care, such as uncontrolled diabetes, autoimmune disease, malignancy treated with chemotherapy or patients who are on immunosuppressive medications or require antibiotic prophylaxis before dental treatment.
- Patients who are able to read and consent in English.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a tooth requiring RCT retreatment that also presents with periodontal pocket(s) deeper than 5mm
- Patients with a tooth requiring RCT retreatment that also presents with severe crown destruction that would prevent proper rubber dam isolation or an adequate restoration
- Patients with a tooth requiring RCT retreatment that also presents with evidence of vertical root fracture, or cracks with probing defects \> 5 mm
- Patients with a tooth requiring RCT retreatment that is deemed unrestorable
- Patients who received antibiotic therapy within the previous 3 months.
- Patients under the age of 16 or those incapable of providing informed consent
- Patients with a tooth requiring RCT retreatment that also presents with immature or open apices
- Patients with a tooth requiring RCT retreatment that also presents with apices in the maxillary sinus or those teeth where the apical lesion has eroded the bone of the maxillary sinus floor
- Patients with a tooth requiring RCT retreatment that also presents with apices that are less than 1 mm from the mandibular canal
- Patients with a tooth requiring RCT retreatment that also presents with internal or external root resorption
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Can Wang, PhD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the interventions, the treating clinician cannot be blinded to the treatment allocation. However, laboratory personnel performing microbiological analyses, including quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), will be blinded to group assignment. In addition, investigators assessing Endocator results and analyzing study outcomes will be blinded to the intervention group to minimize potential bias.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2026
First Posted
March 13, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2030
Last Updated
April 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share