Effectiveness of Laser-activated Photoacoustic Flow in One-visit Revision of Teeth With Apical Periodontitis
Clinical Investigation of the Effectiveness of Laser-activated Photoacoustic Flow in One-visit Revision of Teeth With Apical Periodontitis
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of the clinical randomized study is to examine the effectiveness laser-activated irrigation (LAI) on the removal of intracanal microorganisms and the healing of an inflammatory periapical lesion of a tooth after a one-visit revision of teeth with apical periodontitis. The main questions are:
- 1.Does LAI reduces the occurrence of postoperative pain, compared with sonic-activated irrigation?
- 2.Is antimicrobial efficacy of LAI greater than the antimicrobial efficacy of sonic-activated irrigation?
- 3.Is periapical lesion healing after LAI application better than after sonic-activated irrigation?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2026
CompletedFebruary 4, 2026
January 1, 2026
2 years
January 1, 2026
January 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative pain
Following single-visit revision performed with different irrigation activation techniques, occurance, duration and intensity of postoperative pain will be assessed via a questionnaire. A score of 0 represented no pain, while a score of 10 represented the maximum pain, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
From day 1 after treatment to 7 days postoperatively
Radiographic healing of periapical lesions
The healing analysis of the lesion will be performed by volumetric assessment using the ITK-SNAP software. Calculation and volumetric assessment in mm3 will be performed with ITK-SNAP with additional shaping, manual adjustment and transfer. In multi-rooted teeth, the defect will be displayed as the sum of individual periapical processes. All processes smaller than twice the thickness of the periodontal ligament will be counted as 0 mm3, or complete healing.
At the 12-month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Microbiological efficiency
At the baseline
Study Arms (2)
SSP modality of Er:YAG laser activated irrigation
EXPERIMENTALIn group 1, irrigant in the final irrigation protocol will be activated by a radial laser attachment (diameter: 400 µm) of an Er:YAG laser (Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia). The laser settings will be: SSP mode, pulse energy 20 mJ, frequency 15 Hz, pulse duration 50 µs according to the factory settings of the Er:YAG laser for laser-activated disinfection and according to the endodontic space disinfection protocol (23).
Sound-activated irrigation (Smart Lite Pro EndoActivator, DentsplySirona)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn group 2, each irrigant in the final irrigation protocol will be activated by the polymer tip of the sonic irrigation device. The tip will be placed 2 mm from the working length of the canal. The activation time will be 30 s for NaOCL, 60 s for EDTA and 30 s for NaOCl.
Interventions
In this group, the final irrigation protocol will be activated by an Er:YAG laser (Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) in SSP mode.
In this group, the final irrigation protocol will be activated by the polymer tip of the sonic irrigation device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- teeth tender to percussion, palpation
- teeth that have a sinus tract and swelling
- a chronic periapical lesion greater than 5 mm in diameter based on the initial X-ray
- previous endodontic treatment and root canal filling that is inadequate according to clinical criteria (filling, overfilling, non-homogeneous root canal filling, unfilled root canals)
You may not qualify if:
- immunocompromised patients
- pregnant women
- teeth with a periodontal pocket depth greater than 3 mm
- teeth with signs and symptoms of vertical fracture
- teeth that cannot be restored or prosthetically provided after endodontic treatment
- use of antibiotic therapy within the last month
- diagnosis of acute apical abscess
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb
Zagreb, 10 000, Croatia
Related Publications (20)
Davies A, Mannocci F, Mitchell P, Andiappan M, Patel S. The detection of periapical pathoses in root filled teeth using single and parallax periapical radiographs versus cone beam computed tomography - a clinical study. Int Endod J.2015;48(6):582-92.
BACKGROUNDSabeti M, Harouni A, Gabbay J. Comparing Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Laser-Activated Irrigation for Postoperative Pain Reduction in Endodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endod. 2026 Jan;52(1):37-46.
BACKGROUNDErkan E, Gündoğar M, Uslu G, Özyürek T. Postoperative pain after SWEEPS, PIPS, sonic and ultrasonic-assisted irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial. Odontology. 2022 Oct;110(4):786-794.
BACKGROUNDLiapis D, De Bruyne MAA, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Postoperative pain after ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation during root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1037-1050.
BACKGROUNDSathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare- up in single- and multiple- visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2008;41 (2)91-99.
BACKGROUNDDuncan HF, Kirkevang LL, Peters OA, El-Karim I, Krastl G, Del Fabbro M, Chong BS, Galler KM, Segura-Egea JJ, Kebschull M; ESE Workshop Participants and Methodological Consultant. Treatment of pulpal and apical disease: The European Society of Endodontology (ESE) S3-level clinicalpracticeguideline. Int Endod J. 2023 Oct;56 Suppl 3:238-295.
BACKGROUNDDavies A, Patel S, Foschi F, Andiappan M, Mitchell PJ, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathoses using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in endodontically retreated teeth - part 2: a 1 year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J. 2016;49:623-35;
BACKGROUNDPatel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 1: preoperative status. Int Endod J. 2012;45:702-10.
BACKGROUNDDoğan MU, Arıcıoğlu B, Köse TE, Çıkman AŞ, Öksüzer MÇ. Association between the irrigation-agitation techniques and Periapical Healing of large periapical lesions: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 15;28(7):376.
BACKGROUNDMartins MR, Carvalho MF, Pina-Vaz I, Capelas JA, Martins MA, Gutknecht N. Outcome of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-assisted treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a blind randomized clinical trial. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014 Jan;32(1):3-9.
BACKGROUNDJosic U, Mazzitelli C, Maravic T, Fidler A, Breschi L and Mazzoni A. Biofilm in endodontics: in vitro cultivation possibilities, sonic-, ultrasonic- and laser-assisted removal techniques and evaluation of the cleaning efficacy. Polymers (Basel), 2022;14, 1334.
BACKGROUNDDo QL, Gaudin, A. The efficiency of the Er: YAG laser and photoninduced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) as an activation method in endodontic irrigation: a literature review. JLMS. 2020;11,316-334.
BACKGROUNDJordana J, Tandean JN, Salim JF, Jennifer, Febriastuti C, Sampoerno G. Shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS): An alternative to conventional irrigation in endodontic treatment. Conservative Dentistry Journal. 20122. 12:68-72.
BACKGROUNDBlanken J, De Moor RJ, Meire M, etal. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study, LasersSurg Med. 2009;41:7.
BACKGROUNDPeters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, Divito E: Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J.Endod. 2011;1, 37:1008-12.
BACKGROUNDBadami V, Akarapu S, Kethineni H, Mittapalli SP, Bala KR, Fatima SR. Efficacy of Laser-Activated Irrigation Versus Ultrasonic-Activated Irrigation: A SystematicReview. Cureus. 2023;15(3): e36352.
BACKGROUNDHaapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y.Irrigation in endodontics. Braz.Dent. J. 2014;216, 299-303.
BACKGROUNDBaumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electronmicroscopic evaluation off our root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod. 1987;13:147-57.
BACKGROUNDMcComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electronmicroscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. JEndod. 1975;1, 238-42.
BACKGROUNDVertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):3-29.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Domagoj Kunčić
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 1, 2026
First Posted
February 4, 2026
Study Start
January 15, 2024
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion
February 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01