NCT07468981

Brief Summary

Movement quality is considered a comprehensive indicator of neuromuscular control, segmental stability, and efficient force transmission, and is recognized as an important determinant of musculoskeletal health and functional performance. Optimal movement patterns help distribute joint loading appropriately, whereas suboptimal movement strategies may contribute to increased biomechanical stress and the development of overuse injuries over time. In recent years, the passive mechanical properties of muscle (stiffness, tone, and elasticity) have been suggested to influence segmental stability and movement control; however, the relationship between these variables has not been sufficiently investigated in healthy populations. The aim of this study is to examine the association between movement quality and the passive mechanical properties of skeletal muscle in healthy adults. Healthy adult individuals will be included in the study. The sample size was determined based on a priori power analysis, and a total of 42 participants will be recruited. Movement quality will be assessed using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). The FMS is a standardized screening tool consisting of seven fundamental movement tasks designed to evaluate basic movement patterns. Each task will be scored on a scale from 0 to 3, and the total score (0-21 points) will be used as an indicator of overall movement quality. The passive mechanical properties of muscle (stiffness, tone, and elasticity) will be measured using a portable and non-invasive device, the MyotonPRO 5, from the quadriceps, hamstring, gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and erector spinae muscles. Measurements will be performed at standardized anatomical reference points with the muscle in a relaxed position. The device probe will be placed perpendicular to the skin surface over the muscle, and the passive viscoelastic response of the tissue will be recorded. The relationship between variables will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis, depending on data distribution characteristics.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 7, 2026

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 9, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 13, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 15, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 15, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional Movement Screen

    Movement quality will be assessed using FMS. There are a total of 7 subtests. These consist of basic movement patterns performed using body weight. Movement quality will be scored by the researchers. In the test, the minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 21, and an increase in the score reflects an increase in the quality of the movement.

    From enrollment to the end of evaluation at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Muscle Viscoelasticity

    rom enrollment to the end of assesment at 4 weeks

Interventions

The movement quality and passive mechanical properties of muscles will be evaluated in healthy participants.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The research population consists of healthy individuals who do not have a regular exercise habit.

You may qualify if:

  • Female and male participants aged 18-40
  • Inactive individuals according to IPAQ Physical Activity Level
  • Individuals who volunteered to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who exercise and play sports regularly
  • Individuals with a history of surgery within the last 6 months
  • Individuals with active pain

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Health Sciences

Niğde, Bor, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Lee, Y., Kim, M., & Lee, H. (2021). The measurement of stiffness for major muscles with shear wave elastography and myoton: a quantitative analysis study. Diagnostics, 11(3), 524.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B. J., & Voight, M. (2014). Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. International journal of sports physical therapy, 9(3), 396.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kalkhoven, J. T., & Watsford, M. L. (2018). The relationship between mechanical stiffness and athletic performance markers in sub-elite footballers. Journal of sports sciences, 36(9), 1022-1029.

    BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Rabia Zorlular, PhD

    Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2026

First Posted

March 13, 2026

Study Start

March 7, 2026

Primary Completion

April 15, 2026

Study Completion

April 15, 2026

Last Updated

March 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations