Evaluating the Efficacy of Pulsating Electromagnetic Field Therapy by CRAD ULCER X-01 for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
2 other identifiers
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a frequent complication of chronic, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM). Treatment with antibiotics, daily dressing, wound debridement, and wound off-loading is often prescribed. However, many DFU patients still progress into severe outcomes, including non-healing of wounds, infections, necrosis, and osteomyelitis. Prior research has shown that the application of pulsating electromagnetic field (PEMF) could accelerate wound healing, including in those afflicted with DFUs. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a locally developed CRAD ULCER X-01 device that uses the principles of PEMF in promoting DFU healing. Methods: A total of 32 patients with chronic, non-healing DFUs will be recruited from the Orthopaedic Clinic of Hospital Angkatan Tentera Tuanku Mizan and divided into control (C) (n=8) and treatment (T) (n=24) groups. All patients will receive a standard daily dressing. The PEMF will be supplemented for 1 hour/day, 2 hours/day, and 3 hours/day for T1, T2, and T3 subgroups, respectively (n=8 per group); whereas the C group will be controlled for placebo effect (device in-place but switched off). The therapy duration will be until the wound is closed or for a maximum period of three months. All patients will undergo wound assessment, wound edge tissue histology by haematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) staining, and immunohistology (for vascular endothelial growth factor \[VEGF\] and fibroblast growth factor 2 \[FGF-2\] expression), as well as serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) and C-reactive protein (CRP) at preand post-treatment, along with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement only at post-treatment to control for confounder (i.e., glucose control for the past three months). This study hypothesizes that PEMF therapy by CRAD ULCER X-01 device will accelerate DFU healing and improve tissue integrity, with minimal systemic effects assessed via oxidative stress and inflammatory markers. Conclusion: The results from this study will validate PEMF's effectiveness in promoting DFU healing and establish the potential use of locally developed CRAD ULCER X-01 devices as supplementary therapy to standard DFU care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
July 28, 2026
July 1, 2026
7 months
March 6, 2026
July 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of wound healing
Changes in wound size over the study duration
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Tissue histology
3 months
Tissue immunohistology
3 months
Oxidative stress marker
3 months
Inflammatory marker
3 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Glycated haemoglobin
3 months
Study Arms (4)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONWound dressing only without PEMF
Treatment 1
EXPERIMENTALPEMF 1 hour \& wound dressing
Treatment 2
EXPERIMENTALPEMF 2 hours \& wound dressing
Treatment 3
EXPERIMENTALPEMF 3 hours \& wound dressing
Interventions
The intervention in this study is PEMF therapy using CRAD ULCER X-01, which will be given to chronic DFU patients alongside wound dressing. The device projects high-voltage, high-frequency, and low-current electrical stimulation to the DFU wounds. The device operates in a stationary state at the lower end of the hospital bed of patients who are being treated. This is because it depends solely on the wall socket power source (100/220/240V-AC, 50/60 HZ input Supply). The position of the machine would be adjusted and locked using the adapted roller stand in the proximity of the patient's foot. The elevation of the device would then be adjusted through the adapted mechanical arm, allowing the air channel to face the patient's foot while having a gap of 10-15 cm in between the patient's wound and the air beam (non-contact).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provision of written consent by subjects.
- Subject of either sex.
- At least 18 years of age.
- Known diabetes mellitus.
- Diagnosed with chronic DFU Grade I-III and Stage A according to the University of Texas Classification as recommended in the Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Foot (2nd Edition).
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or unwillingness to provide written consent.
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol as determined by the investigator.
- Other medical conditions which, in the investigator's judgement, may be associated with increased risk to the subject or may interfere with study assessments or outcomes.
- Participation in another clinical trial and/or recipient of investigational therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening visit.
- Patients who have metal implants in any part of the body.
- Patients with a pacemaker.
- History of malignancies.
- Presence of chronic kidney disease co-morbidity.
- Presence of severe peripheral artery disease, assessed when the ankle-brachial index (ABI) is \<0.40.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tuanku Mizan Armed Forces Hospital
Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
Related Publications (9)
Ministry of Health Malaysia (2018). Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Diabetic Foot, 2nd Edition. Putrajaya, Malaysia.
BACKGROUNDSidhu AS, Harbuzova V. Emerging technologies for the management of diabetic foot ulceration: a review. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2024 Nov 12;5:1440209. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1440209. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39600625BACKGROUNDKeyan Z, Liqian Z, Xinzhong X, Juehua J, Chungui X. Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Improved Peripheral Nerve Regeneration After Delayed Repair of One Month. Bioelectromagnetics. 2023 Oct-Dec;44(7-8):133-143. doi: 10.1002/bem.22443. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
PMID: 37277911BACKGROUNDAvendano-Coy J, Lopez-Munoz P, Serrano-Munoz D, Comino-Suarez N, Avendano-Lopez C, Martin-Espinosa N. Electrical microcurrent stimulation therapy for wound healing: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Tissue Viability. 2022 May;31(2):268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
PMID: 34903470BACKGROUNDTentolouris, A., Eleftheriadou, I., Samakidou, G., & Tentolouris, N. (2025). Developments in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (Review). World Academy of Sciences Journal, 7, 46.
BACKGROUNDRabbani M, Rahman E, Powner MB, Triantis IF. Making Sense of Electrical Stimulation: A Meta-analysis for Wound Healing. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Feb;52(2):153-177. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03371-2. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
PMID: 37743460BACKGROUNDCheah YJ, Buyong MR, Mohd Yunus MH. Wound Healing with Electrical Stimulation Technologies: A Review. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Nov 1;13(21):3790. doi: 10.3390/polym13213790.
PMID: 34771347BACKGROUNDHaesler, E. (2024). Electrical stimulation therapy for wound healing: a WHAM evidence summary. Wound Practice and Research, 32(3), 163-168.
BACKGROUNDAbd El Rasheed, N. A. (2017). Pulsed electromagnetic fields versus laser therapy on enhancing recovery of diabetic foot ulcer: A single blind randomized controlled trial. Biomedical Research, 28(19), 8509-8514.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2026
First Posted
March 12, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07