Comparison of Nd Yag, Diode and Er:YAG Lasers vs Scalpel in Preprosthetic Vestibuloplasty: Vestibular Depth Gain
78/30102018
Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Three Dental Lasers Versusthe Conventional Scalpeltechnique in Vestibuloplasty
2 other identifiers
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results obtained using the conventional approach versus the modern laser method, by recording postoperative results
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2026
CompletedMarch 10, 2026
March 1, 2026
6.5 years
February 19, 2026
March 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
pain and comfort
Pain and discomfort values were compared between the conventional surgery and the Nd:YAG laser, diode laser, and Er-YAG laser groups by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The laser-treated sides have shown statistically significant reductions in both pain and discomfort scores at all considered timepoints (p \< 0.05), as presented in the following.
days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively
The vestibular gain depth
Vestibular depth measurements were compared between the initial, the immediate postoperatively, and the 6-week postoperatively timepoints. Paired sample t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were utilized, depending on distribution, to evaluate changes within each technique (i.e., conventional and lasers).
6 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Nd -YAG vestibuloplasty group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR12 patients treated for Group 1 using a Nd-YAG laser on the left side of the maxilla. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia to ensure patient comfort and cooperation. The parameters for the Nd-YAG laser (Lightwalke, Fotona, Slovenia) that was utilized for this procedure were: center wavelength of 1064 nm, output power of 4 W, frequency equal to 25 Hz, Micro Short Pulse (MSP) mode, sapphire fiber of 300 micrometers in diameter, power density equal to 6229 W/cm2. The right side was treated conventional using the scalpel. Clark's vestibuloplasty method was applied in all conventionally operated right sides of the patients
Diode laser vestibuloplasty group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR12 patients treated for Group 2 where a diode laser was utilized. for performing the left side of the maxilla. we utilized the Epic X TM laser from Biolase, with a center wavelength of 940 nm and a pre-initiated tip, in a contact, continuous mode, with an output energy of 3 W. Surgery with the laser tip began at the mucogingival junction with a horizontal movement directing the laser parallel to the bone, and thus slowly releasing the muscle fibers towards the new vestibule depth. The right side of the maxilla was performed by conventional surgery using Clark s method.
Er-YAG laservestibuloplasty group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR12 patients treated for Group 3 where an Er-YAG laser was utilized to treat the left side of the maxilla. The Er-YAG laser (Lightwalker, Fotona, Slovenia) was equipped with a H14 handpiece, characterized by the following parameters: center wavelength of 2940 nm, contact mode, long pulse, energy of 200 mJ, frequency equal to 20 Hz, power of 4 W, water 2, gas 2. The right side of the maxilla was performed by conventional surgery using Clark s method
Interventions
For patients treated by Nd-YAG laser, the procedure was performed under local anesthesia . The parameters for the Nd-YAG laser are: center wavelength of 1064 nm, output power of 4 W, frequency equal to 25 Hz, Micro Short Pulse (MSP) mode, sapphire fiber of 300 micrometers in diameter, power density equal to 6229 W/cm2. Conventional vestibuloplasty was applied on the right side of the maxilla using Clark's method. A horizontal incision was performed at the mucogingival junction. The supraperiosteal dissection is performed and the muscles insertions were gradually dissected in an apical direction up to the desired vestibular depth. The mucosa of the inner side of the lip was undermined and the pedicled mucosal flap was secured to the periosteum at the new vestibule depth by using a 4-0 absorbable suture . The wound healed by second intention without any additional graft.
we utilized the Epic X TM laser from Biolase, with a center wavelength of 940 nm and a pre-initiated tip, in a contact, continuous mode, with an output energy of 3 W. Ablation with the laser tip began at the mucogingival junction with a horizontal movement directing the laser parallel to the bone, and thus slowly releasing the muscle fibers towards the new vestibule depth. The right side of the maxilla was treated by conventional vestibuloplasty, Clark s method
For the left side of the maxilla, we utilized an Er-YAG laser (Lightwalker, Fotona, Slovenia) equipped with a H14 handpiece, characterized by the following parameters: center wavelength of 2940 nm, contact mode, long pulse, energy of 200 mJ, frequency equal to 20 Hz, power of 4 W, water 2, gas 2. For the right side of the maxilla we applied conventional vestibuloplasty using Clark s method.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Systemically healthy 36 edentulous patients , We selected the patients to be candidates for total prostheses and complete edentulous at the level of the maxilla.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nica Diana
Timișoara, Romania
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2026
First Posted
March 10, 2026
Study Start
April 30, 2018
Primary Completion
October 20, 2024
Study Completion
October 20, 2024
Last Updated
March 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03