Digital Mirror Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
Digital Mirror Therapy in Poststroke Rehabilitation: Efficacy and Patient-reported Facilitators and Barriers to Adherence.
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: While conventional mirror therapy is a Level A recommended rehabilitation for poststroke upper extremity recovery, digital mirror therapy-enabled by augmented reality and computer vision-offers a promising alternative with potential for greater engagement and enriched sensory feedback. However, systematic comparisons of their clinical and physiological benefits, alongside an understanding of patient experiences with digital therapy, are lacking. Objectives: This randomized controlled trial will compare the efficacy of digital versus conventional mirror therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation in people after chronic stroke. The evaluation will focus on three areas: 1) clinical outcomes in motor function and community integration; 2) musculoskeletal physiological mechanisms, assessed through upper extremity muscle co-activation patterns; and 3) patient-reported barriers and facilitators to adherence with the digital technology. Methods: A parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Participants with chronic stroke will be randomized to receive either digital or conventional mirror therapy three times per week for a total of 10 sessions over 21 days. The quantitative outcomes will be upper extremity function (using clinical scales), community integration (using a dedicated scale), and muscle activation/co-activation patterns during functional tasks (measured via surface electromyography \[EMG\]). The qualitative outcome will be patient-experienced barriers and facilitators, which will be explored through focus groups. Expected Results: This project aims to determine whether digital mirror therapy yields superior clinical outcomes compared to the conventional protocol. We hypothesize that greater improvement in upper extremity motor function will be associated with increased voluntary activation of task-relevant muscles and a reduction in abnormal co-contraction patterns. Furthermore, the qualitative findings will provide insights into the practical facilitators and barriers to patient adherence to digital technological rehabilitation, which will guide its future development and real-world clinical implementation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
March 10, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.8 years
March 4, 2026
March 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Scores
Baseline
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Scores
After 3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
digital mirror therapy
EXPERIMENTALFor the digital mirror therapy, we will use a self-developed digital visual feedback system to deliver the intervention. We will design 6-8 upper limb functional training tasks for each patient, according to the level of upper extremity functioning. Patients will complete these tasks under the guidance of the investigator during each training session. The digital mirror therapy will be delivered through an augmented reality system with virtual objects and enhanced visual feedback onto the patient's view of their affected upper extremity. Each task will be repeated 20 times per session, with the total duration of each session being approximately 45-60 minutes. Participants will participate three times per week in a maximal period of 21 days, for a total of 10 training sessions.
conventional mirror therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe conventional mirror therapy group will receive the identical dose and structure of training but using a physical mirror. The therapy will be performed using a conventional mirror and common physical objects for task-oriented practice. They will participate three times per week in a maximal period of 21 days, for a total of 10 training sessions.
Interventions
In the digital mirror therapy, we will use a self-developed digital visual feedback system to deliver the intervention. We will design 6-8 upper limb functional training tasks for each patient, according to the level of upper extremity functioning. Patients will complete these tasks under the guidance of the investigator during each training session. The digital mirror therapy will be delivered through an augmented reality system with virtual objects and enhanced visual feedback onto the patient's view of their affected upper extremity. Each task will be repeated 20 times per session, with the total duration of each session being approximately 45-60 minutes.
The conventional mirror therapy group will receive the identical dose and structure of training but using a physical mirror. The therapy will be performed using a conventional mirror and common physical objects for task-oriented practice. Both groups will participate three times per week in a maximal period of 21 days, for a total of 10 training sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke more than 6 months;
- age between 18 and 80 years;
- upper limb function rated at levels 2-6 according to the Functional Test for Hemiplegic Extremity Hong Kong Version
You may not qualify if:
- any concomitant neurological disease other than stroke;
- signs of cognitive impairment, defined as a score below 6 out of 10 on the Abbreviated Mental Test - Hong Kong Version ;
- or severe spasticity in the hemiparetic upper extremity muscles, with a Modified Ashworth Scale score greater than 2;
- unable to express thoughts effectively through verbal speech or written language.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jack Jiaqi Zhang
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2026
First Posted
March 10, 2026
Study Start
March 2, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
March 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03