Priming Theta Burst Stimulation for Stroke: A Study of Intensity
Optimizing the Intensity of Priming Theta Burst Stimulation to Improve Hemiparetic Upper Limb Motor Functions After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke. Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke. Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke. Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold \[RMT\] continuous theta burst stimulation \[cTBS\]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week. Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials. Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2027
July 24, 2025
July 1, 2024
1.5 years
July 15, 2024
July 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
Baseline
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
At 3 weeks
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
At one-month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
Baseline
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
At 3 weeks
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
At one-month
Study Arms (4)
Low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
EXPERIMENTALStandard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Low intensity priming iTBS consists of a session of 55% RMT cTBS, followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
Standard priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
EXPERIMENTALStandard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Standard priming iTBS consists of a session of 70% RMT cTBS, followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
Nonpriming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Nonpriming iTBS consists of a session of 20% RMT cTBS (sham), followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
Sham stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORStandard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Sham stimulation consists of a session of 20% RMT cTBS (sham), followed by 20% RMT iTBS (sham).
Interventions
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control. Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral upper limb motor dysfunction caused by ischemic stroke, with stroke onset≥6 months. Diagnosis will be verified using discharge summary and radiological reports issued by Hospital Authority. Qualifying participants will undergo structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the University Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience (UBSN) at PolyU to further confirm their lesion location in the period of experimental participation.
- Age between 18 and 80 years.
- Residual upper limb functions between levels 2-6 in the FTHUE, indicating moderately-to-severely impaired upper limb motor functions.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded:
- any contraindications to TMS (screened by the safety checklist by Rossi(33)) and/or MRI (screened by the MRI safety checklist offered by UBSN \[see supplement\]).
- Diagnosed with any concomitant neurological disease other than stroke.
- signs of cognitive impairment, with a Montreal cognitive assessment score\<21/22 out of 30 (34).
- Severe spasticity in the hemiparetic upper limb muscles, with a Modified Ashworth score \> 2 (35).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universitylead
- Tung Wah Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Jack Jiaqi Zhang
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2024
First Posted
July 19, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2027
Last Updated
July 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-07