NCT06509789

Brief Summary

Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke. Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke. Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke. Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold \[RMT\] continuous theta burst stimulation \[cTBS\]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week. Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials. Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
17mo left

Started Jul 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress38%
Jul 2025Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 19, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2025

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2027

Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

July 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeTranscranial magnetic stimulationTheta burst stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb

    Baseline

  • The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb

    At 3 weeks

  • The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb

    At one-month

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential

    Baseline

  • P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential

    At 3 weeks

  • P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential

    At one-month

Study Arms (4)

Low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

EXPERIMENTAL

Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Low intensity priming iTBS consists of a session of 55% RMT cTBS, followed by 70% RMT iTBS.

Device: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) - Theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol

Standard priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

EXPERIMENTAL

Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Standard priming iTBS consists of a session of 70% RMT cTBS, followed by 70% RMT iTBS.

Device: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) - Theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol

Nonpriming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Nonpriming iTBS consists of a session of 20% RMT cTBS (sham), followed by 70% RMT iTBS.

Device: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) - Theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol

Sham stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Sham stimulation consists of a session of 20% RMT cTBS (sham), followed by 20% RMT iTBS (sham).

Device: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) - Theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol

Interventions

This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control. Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.

Low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)Nonpriming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)Sham stimulationStandard priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Unilateral upper limb motor dysfunction caused by ischemic stroke, with stroke onset≥6 months. Diagnosis will be verified using discharge summary and radiological reports issued by Hospital Authority. Qualifying participants will undergo structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the University Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience (UBSN) at PolyU to further confirm their lesion location in the period of experimental participation.
  • Age between 18 and 80 years.
  • Residual upper limb functions between levels 2-6 in the FTHUE, indicating moderately-to-severely impaired upper limb motor functions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded:
  • any contraindications to TMS (screened by the safety checklist by Rossi(33)) and/or MRI (screened by the MRI safety checklist offered by UBSN \[see supplement\]).
  • Diagnosed with any concomitant neurological disease other than stroke.
  • signs of cognitive impairment, with a Montreal cognitive assessment score\<21/22 out of 30 (34).
  • Severe spasticity in the hemiparetic upper limb muscles, with a Modified Ashworth score \> 2 (35).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jack Jiaqi Zhang

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationClinical Protocols

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeuticsEpidemiologic Study CharacteristicsHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2024

First Posted

July 19, 2024

Study Start

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-07

Locations