Usability Evaluation of Gen AI-based Nutrition Chatbot for Pregnant Women
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Pregnancy imposes significant physical demands, with complications like gestational diabetes (GDM) and pre-eclampsia posing serious risks. Nutrition is crucial for mitigation, but accessing reliable guidance remains challenging. This study evaluates the feasibility of an AI chatbot providing nutritional guidance for managing these conditions. Methods: In a quasi-experimental design, 100 pregnant women will self-select into either the intervention group (n=50, using an AI chatbot) or control group (n=50, receiving standard care). The primary outcome is usability measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS) at 12 weeks, with an expected mean difference of ≥13 points. Secondary outcomes include technology acceptance (Technology Acceptance Model), user engagement, information accuracy, and changes in dietary knowledge/behaviors. Quantitative data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat and t-tests. Semi-structured interviews with 20 participants will explore user experiences through thematic analysis. Expected Results: The AI chatbot is anticipated to demonstrate superior usability and high user acceptance (TAM \>5.0/7), with improvements in dietary knowledge and behavior. Qualitative findings will provide insights into benefits, barriers, and engagement factors. Conclusion: This study will establish an evidence base on AI chatbot feasibility and acceptance for prenatal nutrition, informing tool optimization and future large-scale trials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2027
March 9, 2026
March 1, 2026
8 months
February 24, 2026
March 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Usability will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a 10-item questionnaire with five-point Likert responses. SUS yields a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability. Scores will be compared between groups at 12 weeks.
12weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean Score on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Questionnaire
12 weeks
Proportion of Participants Achieving Adequate Engagement Adherence
12 weeks
Mean Number of Platform Logins per Week
12 weeks
Mean Number of Queries Submitted per Participant
12 weeks
Proportion of Chatbot Responses Rated as Accurate by Clinical Expert Panel
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
The intervention group
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group will access the the nutrition AI chatbot.
The control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will receive routine care along with access to a standardized WeChat information service. To ensure a fair comparison, the WeChat service for the control group will be operated by a trained research assistant using a pre-defined script and protocol. The assistant will respond to enquiries during two pre-scheduled windows per day (e.g., 10:00-12:00 and 14:00-16:00) by providing information directly quoted or paraphrased from the official nutritional leaflets.
Interventions
A culturally tailored nutrition AI chatbot for pregnant women , and the AI chatbot support will be available 24/7
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women aged 18 years or older
- Able to provide informed consent in the study language
- Own a smartphone with internet access and the WeChat application
You may not qualify if:
- Current enrollment in other nutrition intervention studies
- Severe mental health conditions that may impair technology use or ability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hong Kong Metropolitan University
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Links
- Caropreso, L., de Azevedo Cardoso, T., Eltayebani, M., \& Frey, B. N. (2020). Preeclampsia as a risk factor for postpartum depression and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 23(4), 493-505.
- Charlton, M. (2016). The evolving management of gestational diabetes. The Hong Kong Practitioner, 38(2).
- Feghali, M. N., Abebe, K. Z., Comer, D. M., Caritis, S., Catov, J. M., \& Scifres, C. M. (2018). Pregnancy outcomes in women with an early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 138, 177-186.
- Hyzy, M., Bond, R., Mulvenna, M., Bai, L., Dix, A., Leigh, S., \& Hunt, S. (2022). System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 10(8).
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bronya Luk, DHSc
School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Hong Kong Metropolitan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2026
First Posted
March 9, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2027
Last Updated
March 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The informed consent form signed by participants did not include provisions for the public sharing of individual-level data. Furthermore, the ethical approval granted by the \[Name of Your Ethics Committee/IRB\] imposes restrictions on the dissemination of data to protect participant confidentiality. Therefore, only aggregated and anonymized results will be published.