The Impact of Anesthetics on FLIP
Impact of Anesthetics on Esophageal Motility as Assessed by Functional Luminal Imaging Probe (FLIP) Topography
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To understand the impact of commonly used anesthetics on esophageal motility during FLIP topography.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
March 9, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.6 years
March 4, 2026
March 4, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Distensibility
FLIP Imaging EGJ metric Distensibility at 60 mL fill volume
at 10 min
Diameter
FLIP Imaging EGJ metric Diameter
at 10 min
Contractile Response
Contractile response category
at 10 min
Secondary Outcomes (1)
EGJ opening category
at 10 min
Study Arms (3)
propofol-propofol
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis is the control comparison of a subject undergoing FLIP imaging under the baseline scenario of propofol alone and then the again for a second time under propofol alone.
propofol-SEVO
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is the the study comparison group of a subject undergoing FLIP imaging under the baseline scenario of propofol alone and then the again for a second time but this time under the anesthetic gas sevofluorane.
propofol-ISO
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is the the study comparison group of a subject undergoing FLIP imaging under the baseline scenario of propofol alone and then the again for a second time but this time under the anesthetic gas isofluorane.
Interventions
FLIP imaging will occur twice per subject with the same baseline (propofol) assessment and then a second study assessment with propofol, sevofluorane, or isofluorane.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Study subjects will include male and female patients age ≥18 to 75 years with dysphagia caused by achalasia (Type I, II or III) or by EGJ-outflow obstruction, suspected motility disorder, or undergoing an endoscopy to rule out an esophageal motility disorder who have been seen by Drs. Konda, Spechler, Nguyen, Reddy, Ellison, or Podgaetz. These patients will be undergoing an endoscopy and POEM procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 or \>75 years, patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent; known gastrointestinal or thoracic or head and neck malignancy; known previous myotomy fundoplication, or other surgery involving the hiatus; and pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Baylor University Medical Center - Jonsson Building
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Related Publications (9)
Benitez A, Jablonka DH, Sahu V, Gluckman C, DeMarshall M, Ostapenko S, Falk GW, Lynch KL, Menard-Katcher CD, Muir AB. Sevoflurane influences esophagogastric junction distensibility in the absence of esophageal inflammation. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: AB 635,Tu 1968
BACKGROUNDWellington J, Kim GE, Yang AH, Hwang DG, Kim RE. Effect of Anesthetics during endoflip impacts diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Gastrointest Endosc; 2020; 91: AB 133, Sa 1253
BACKGROUNDDonnan EN, Pandolfino JE. EndoFLIP in the Esophagus: Assessing Sphincter Function, Wall Stiffness, and Motility to Guide Treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2020 Sep;49(3):427-435. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
PMID: 32718562BACKGROUNDKahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE; International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
PMID: 25469569BACKGROUNDPandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008 Nov;135(5):1526-33. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.022. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
PMID: 18722376BACKGROUNDPandolfino JE, Gawron AJ. Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 May 12;313(18):1841-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2996.
PMID: 25965233BACKGROUNDHolloway RH, Dodds WJ, Helm JF, Hogan WJ, Dent J, Arndorfer RC. Integrity of cholinergic innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter in achalasia. Gastroenterology. 1986 Apr;90(4):924-9. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90869-3.
PMID: 3949120BACKGROUNDGoldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE. Histopathologic features in esophagomyotomy specimens from patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology. 1996 Sep;111(3):648-54. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8780569.
PMID: 8780569BACKGROUNDGoldblum JR, Whyte RI, Orringer MB, Appelman HD. Achalasia. A morphologic study of 42 resected specimens. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Apr;18(4):327-37.
PMID: 8141427BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vani A Konda, MD
Baylor Health Care System
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2026
First Posted
March 9, 2026
Study Start
November 22, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03