The STEP-MIED Trial: Digital Stepped-Care for Emotional Disorders
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Digital Stepped-care Mindfulness Intervention for Recovery From Emotional Disorders: a Multicentre Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
464
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a digital mindfulness-based intervention in adults (aged 18-65) diagnosed with emotional disorders like depression or anxiety. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does adding a digital mindfulness intervention to usual care help people recover from emotional disorders faster and more sustainably over two years?
- Is this combined approach more cost-effective than usual care alone? Researchers will compare the group receiving the digital mindfulness intervention plus their usual treatment to the group receiving only their usual treatment to see if the intervention leads to better long-term recovery and represents good value for money. Participants in the intervention group will:
- Attend eight weekly 2-hour online group mindfulness sessions.
- Use a WeChat mini-program for 49 days of guided mindfulness exercises and daily tasks.
- Patients who have not achieved reliable recovery after group retraining voluntarily participate in individual UP\&MIED counseling.
- Complete regular questionnaires and interviews over two years to track their progress. All participants will continue to receive their usual medical care from their doctors throughout the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2028
April 21, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.1 years
March 2, 2026
April 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Reliable Recovery
According to the standard definition of the IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies) system (El Baou et al., 2023; Gyani et al., 2013), reliable recovery requires meeting both of the following conditions simultaneously: (1) Reliable improvement: a decrease in PHQ-9 score of ≥6 points, or a decrease in GAD-7 score of ≥4 points, compared to baseline; (2) Symptoms below clinical thresholds: PHQ-9 \< 10 and GAD-7 \< 8. Time to reliable recovery is defined as the time from randomization to the first point at which both of the above criteria are met.
at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Time to relapse
at baseline (T0), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
Rate of reliable improvement
at baseline (T0), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
Rate of reliable recovery
at baseline (T0), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
Deterioration rate
at baseline (T0), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
Health related quality of life
at baseline (T0), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (7)
Changes of engaging in life
at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
Changes of distress tolerance
at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
Changes of experiential avoidance
at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 6(T4), 12(T5), 18(T6), and 24(T7) months after the intervention
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the MIED group will receive an eight-week live, online group course, along with 49 days of self-guided iMIED practice delivered through a digital platform. After completing the program, participants will be offered three optional online group refresher sessions, scheduled 1, 3, and 6 months post-intervention. Some participants, based on the assessment of the group instructors, may be recommended for individual counseling sessions. After the intervention, the research team will provide participants with educational materials on medication management communication and encourage them to discuss long-term treatment plans with their attending psychiatrists, including the possibility of optimizing medication doses based on stable conditions . All medical decisions must be ultimately determined by the psychiatrist . At the same time, throughout the study, participants will go through all their treatments as usual.
TAU Group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the treatment as usual (TAU) group will continue to receive routine clinical treatment for emotional disorders at their respective centers, including pharmacotherapy, psychoeducation, supportive interviews, and necessary psychosocial services . Medication types, doses, and adjustments are entirely determined by clinicians based on the patient's condition. To describe treatment exposure, we will collect treatment information from patients at baseline, post-intervention, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months follow-up. To avoid intervention contamination, the research team will not provide any mindfulness-related materials or training to the TAU group before the trial ends. Participants are also advised to avoid participating in other 8-week mindfulness courses . If participation is necessary, relevant information will be recorded and handled sensitively in the analysis.
Interventions
MIED is a psychological intervention program based on "Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction" (MBSR) and the "Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders" (UP), proposed by one of our authors. It includes a psychological diamond model of emotional distress and core intervention strategies (Liu, 2024). This program, in the form of mental health education courses, is suitable for patients with emotional disorders such as anxiety and depression. It has shown good effects in alleviating emotional distress in a series of preliminary studies (Ju et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023; Li et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024). In this study, the intervention mainly adopts a step-care model, dynamically adjusting the intensity of the intervention according to the patient's recovery progress. All intervention content revolves around the four core transdiagnostic mechanisms of the MIED psychological diamond model and their corresponding core intervention strategies.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 18-65 years.
- Diagnosed with an emotional disorder by a outpatient psychiatrist, including depressive disorders, anxiety disorders (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder), obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and eating disorders (e.g., anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa).
- Symptom severity meeting the threshold: PHQ-9 score ≥10 or GAD-7 score ≥8.
You may not qualify if:
- Current diagnosis of psychotic disorders or bipolar disorder.
- Current organic mental disorders, pervasive developmental disorders, severe cognitive impairment, or substance use disorders.
- Current suicide risk (PHQ-9 item 9 score \>2).
- Antisocial personality disorder.
- Severe medical illnesses that may affect intervention participation or require recent hospitalization.
- Previous participation in a systematic 8-week mindfulness course.
- Inability to access the internet.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xi'an Mental Health Centercollaborator
- The Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Brain Hospitalcollaborator
- Peking Universitylead
- WU'AN FIRST PEOPLE'S HOSPITALcollaborator
- The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical Universitycollaborator
- DONG GUAN SEVENTH PEOPLE'S HOSPITALcollaborator
- Affiliated Mental Health Center of Kunming Medical Universitycollaborator
- The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical Universitycollaborator
- Xiamen Medical College Affiliated Xian Yue Hospitalcollaborator
- People's Hospital of Zhengzhou Universitycollaborator
- THE SIXTH AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF GUANGDONG PHARMACEUTICAL UNIVERSITYcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Peking University
Beijing, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xinghua Liu
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences,Peking University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Data analysts (as part of the investigator team) are masked during the primary analysis phase, working with group codes (e.g., A/B) and unblinding only after completion of the main analysis to minimize bias .
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Tenured Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2026
First Posted
March 9, 2026
Study Start
March 23, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Given that the data in this study involves sensitive mental health information of patients and ethical restrictions, this research plan does not share individual-level research data with the public. If there is a reasonable academic need, an application can be made through the corresponding author, and after evaluation by the research team and the ethics committee, a decision will be made on whether to provide the necessary data summary or analytical support.