Comparison of Vicryl Versus Prolene for Midline Rectus Sheath Closure After Elective Laparotomy
2 other identifiers
interventional
152
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial compared two commonly used suture materials, Prolene and Vicryl, for closing the midline rectus sheath after elective laparotomy. Proper closure of the abdominal wall is important to reduce complications such as wound dehiscence and surgical site infection. Adult patients undergoing elective midline laparotomy were randomly assigned to rectus sheath closure using either Prolene or Vicryl sutures. All patients received the same standardized surgical technique and postoperative care. Participants were followed for 30 days after surgery to assess wound healing, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and length of hospital stay. The study aimed to determine which suture material is associated with fewer postoperative wound complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2026
CompletedMarch 5, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.6 years
January 8, 2026
March 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of Surgical Site Infection within 30 Days Post-Laparotomy
Surgical site infection (SSI) is defined as purulent discharge, erythema, or positive microbiology from the incision site within 30 days postoperatively. All infections will be classified and documented according to CDC guidelines.
30 days
Incidence of Wound Dehiscence within 30 Days Post-Laparotomy
Wound dehiscence is defined as the separation of the rectus sheath or wound edges, including partial or complete dehiscence, observed within 30 days after midline laparotomy. Clinical examination will be used to assess wound integrity, and findings will be documented in the patient's medical record.
30 days postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Vicryl Suture Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergoing elective midline laparotomy will have rectus sheath closure performed using Vicryl (polyglactin 910) suture material according to standard surgical technique.
Prolene Suture Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants undergoing elective midline laparotomy will have rectus sheath closure performed using Prolene (polypropylene) suture material according to standard surgical technique.
Interventions
Vicryl (polyglactin 910) is an absorbable braided synthetic suture used for closure of the rectus sheath during elective midline laparotomy. The suture is applied using a standard mass closure technique according to institutional surgical protocols.
Prolene (polypropylene) is a non-absorbable monofilament synthetic suture used for closure of the rectus sheath during elective midline laparotomy. The suture is applied using a standard mass closure technique according to institutional surgical protocols.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 70 years
- Patients undergoing elective midline laparotomy
- Ability to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency laparotomy
- Previous abdominal mesh placement
- Immunocompromised patients
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar
Peshawar, KPK, 25000, Pakistan
Related Publications (6)
Frassini S, Cobianchi L, Fugazzola P, Biffl WL, Coccolini F, Damaskos D, et al. ECLAPTE: Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency-2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2023 July 26;18(1):42.
BACKGROUNDHelgeland J, Tomic O, Hansen TM, Kristoffersen DT, Hassani S, Lindahl AK. Postoperative wound dehiscence after laparotomy: a useful healthcare quality indicator? A cohort study based on Norwegian hospital administrative data. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e026422.
RESULTWalming S, Angenete E, Block M, Bock D, Gessler B, Haglind E. Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. BMC Surg. 2017 Feb 22;17(1):19.
RESULTAkbar F, Khan M, Ahmad N, Abbas S, Khan N. Comparison of Laparotomy Wound Dehiscence (LWD) Rate Using Interrupted X-Suture Technique vs Continuous Suture Technique in Rectus Sheath in Emergency Laparotomy. Journal of Saidu Medical College Swat. 2021;11(3):133-6.
RESULTUsman Ali Rahman, Muhammad Adil Iftikhar, Mohammad Zia Ul Miraj, Maliha Javaid Butt, Iftikhar Ahmed, Humaira Yousaf. Incidence of wound dehischence and factors causing wound dehiscence in patients undergoing laparotomy in a newly established surgery department at a tertiary care hospital. TPMJ. 2023 Oct 5;30(10):1225-9.
RESULTKunju RD, Thakkannavar V, K SM, G SH, Netto A, J S, et al. A clinical study of continuous and interrupted fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy at a tertiary care centre. International Surgery Journal. 2017 May 24;4(6):2014-7.
RESULT
Related Links
- Lakshmi G, Ravimohan TR. Post Laparotomy Abdominal Wound Dehisence - A Study in Tertiary Care Hospital. IJCMR \[Internet\]. 2018 Nov \[cited 2025 Nov 5\];5(11). Available from: https://www.ijcmr.com/uploads/7/7/4/6/77464738/ijcmr\_2208\_v1.pdf
- Alam I, Amin S, Iqbal S, Samad M, Tahir R. THE FREQUENCY OF WOUND DEHISCENCE IN ADULTS UNDERGOING MIDLINE EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN PESHAWAR. NORTHWEST JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES \[Internet\]. 2025 Sept 30 \[cited 2025 Nov 4\];4(
- Related Info
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gohar Ali, MBBS, FCPS
Hayatabad Medical Complex
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This is an open-label study as the operating surgeon is aware of the suture material used.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2026
First Posted
March 5, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 30, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
March 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
De-identified individual participant data, including demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes, will be shared with qualified researchers for scientific research purposes only. Data will be available after publication of the primary results and provided in a secure, de-identified format upon submission of a research proposal and data use agreement.