NCT07078669

Brief Summary

Purpose - This exploratory, split-wound study aims to evaluate the potential difference in skin reactions to two different types of sutures, dyed and undyed, used to close wounds after surgery. The study will assess whether dyed sutures to elicit increased tissue reactivity like redness, itching, and scarring and whether undyed sutures may be more optimal for wound healing and cosmetic response. Enrollment into the study and data collection is expected to take approximately 3-6 months. Follow-up visits will be chosen at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery, which is standard practice for monitoring healing and checking for complications such as infection or abnormal scarring. Primary Objective - The primary objective is to assess the response of wounds closed with both dyed and undyed sutures after cutaneous surgery to determine if there is a difference in wound healing and tissue reactivity with one compared to the other. Enrollment into the study and data collection is expected to take approximately 3-6 months. Follow-up visits will be chosen at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery, which is standard practice for monitoring healing and checking for complications such as infection or abnormal scarring.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 11, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 22, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

July 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (42)

  • Clinical Erythema Assessment scale

    Erythema will be assessed on both sides of the surgical wound using a 0-4 Clinical Erythema Assessment scale: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe with 0 being the better outcome and 4 the worst.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Clinical Erythema Assessment scale

    Erythema will be assessed on both sides of the surgical wound using a 0-4 Clinical Erythema Assessment scale: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe with 0 being the better outcome and 4 the worst.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Clinical Erythema Assessment scale

    Erythema will be assessed on both sides of the surgical wound using a 0-4 Clinical Erythema Assessment scale: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe with 0 being the better outcome and 4 the worst.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring

    Percentage of the presence of hypertrophic scarring. Visual clinical assessment of each side of the wound will document the presence or absence of hypertrophic scarring (yes/no). A lower percentage of presence of hypertrophic scarring is better than higher.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring

    Percentage of the presence of hypertrophic scarring. Visual clinical assessment of each side of the wound will document the presence or absence of hypertrophic scarring (yes/no). A lower percentage of presence of hypertrophic scarring is better than higher.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring

    Percentage of the presence of hypertrophic scarring. Visual clinical assessment of each side of the wound will document the presence or absence of hypertrophic scarring (yes/no). A lower percentage of presence of hypertrophic scarring is better than higher.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Presence of Suture Extrusion

    Presence of Suture Extrusion: Wound evaluation will record whether sutures are visibly extruding from the skin (yes/no) on each side of the wound, to compare extrusion frequency (percentage of suture extrusion being present) between suture types.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Suture Extrusion

    Presence of Suture Extrusion: Wound evaluation will record whether sutures are visibly extruding from the skin (yes/no) on each side of the wound, to compare extrusion frequency (percentage of suture extrusion being present) between suture types.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Suture Extrusion

    Presence of Suture Extrusion: Wound evaluation will record whether sutures are visibly extruding from the skin (yes/no) on each side of the wound, to compare extrusion frequency (percentage of suture extrusion being present) between suture types.

    3 Months post-procedure

  • Presence of Surgical Site Infection

    Presence of Surgical Site Infection: Wound will be evaluated for signs of infection (e.g. erythema, exudate, tenderness) and recorded as yes/no to compare infection frequency (percentage of infection being present) between suture types.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Surgical Site Infection

    Presence of Surgical Site Infection: Wound will be evaluated for signs of infection (e.g. erythema, exudate, tenderness) and recorded as yes/no to compare infection frequency (percentage of infection being present) between suture types.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Surgical Site Infection

    Presence of Surgical Site Infection: Wound will be evaluated for signs of infection (e.g. erythema, exudate, tenderness) and recorded as yes/no to compare infection frequency (percentage of infection being present) between suture types.

    3 Months post-procedure

  • Presence of Edema

    Presence of Edema: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Edema

    Presence of Edema: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Edema

    Presence of Edema: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Presence of Wound Induration

    Presence of Wound Induration: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Wound Induration

    Presence of Wound Induration: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Wound Induration

    Presence of Wound Induration: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Presence of Hyperpigmentation

    Presence of Hyperpigmentation: Visual observation will determine whether increased pigmentation is present at the wound site and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Hyperpigmentation

    Presence of Hyperpigmentation: Visual observation will determine whether increased pigmentation is present at the wound site and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Hyperpigmentation

    Presence of Hyperpigmentation: Visual observation will determine whether increased pigmentation is present at the wound site and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Presence of Exudate

    Presence of Exudate: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for exudate (fluid drainage) and recorded as yes/no to assess differences in wound response.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Exudate

    Presence of Exudate: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for exudate (fluid drainage) and recorded as yes/no to assess differences in wound response.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Exudate

    Presence of Exudate: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for exudate (fluid drainage) and recorded as yes/no to assess differences in wound response.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Presence of Dehiscence

    Presence of Dehiscence: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for dehiscence (any separation or opening) at the site of closure and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Dehiscence

    Presence of Dehiscence: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for dehiscence (any separation or opening) at the site of closure and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Dehiscence

    Presence of Dehiscence: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for dehiscence (any separation or opening) at the site of closure and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Failure to Epithelialize

    Failure to Epithelialize: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be evaluated for failure to epithelialize (incomplete skin coverage) and recorded as yes/no to compare differences between suture types.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Failure to Epithelialize

    Failure to Epithelialize: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be evaluated for failure to epithelialize (incomplete skin coverage) and recorded as yes/no to compare differences between suture types.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Failure to Epithelialize

    Failure to Epithelialize: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be evaluated for failure to epithelialize (incomplete skin coverage) and recorded as yes/no to compare differences between suture types.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Presence of Suture Granuloma

    Presence of Suture Granuloma: Granuloma formation at the suture site will be visually identified and recorded as yes/no. Comparison will be made between dyed and undyed sides.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Suture Granuloma

    Presence of Suture Granuloma: Granuloma formation at the suture site will be visually identified and recorded as yes/no. Comparison will be made between dyed and undyed sides.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Suture Granuloma

    Presence of Suture Granuloma: Granuloma formation at the suture site will be visually identified and recorded as yes/no. Comparison will be made between dyed and undyed sides.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Presence of Contact Dermatitis

    Presence of Contact Dermatitis: Contact dermatitis will be assessed and graded on a standardized International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) grading scale: - (none), + (weak), ++ (strong), +++ (extreme), IR (irritant) with none being the best outcome. The grading will be used to compare reactions between the two suture types.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Contact Dermatitis

    Presence of Contact Dermatitis: Contact dermatitis will be assessed and graded on a standardized International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) grading scale: - (none), + (weak), ++ (strong), +++ (extreme), IR (irritant) with none being the best outcome. The grading will be used to compare reactions between the two suture types.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Presence of Contact Dermatitis

    Presence of Contact Dermatitis: Contact dermatitis will be assessed and graded on a standardized International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) grading scale: - (none), + (weak), ++ (strong), +++ (extreme), IR (irritant) with none being the best outcome. The grading will be used to compare reactions between the two suture types.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Patient-Rated Pruritus

    Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patient will rate itch severity on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Patient-Rated Pruritus

    Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patient will rate itch severity on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Patient-Rated Pruritus

    Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patient will rate itch severity on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.

    3 months post-procedure

  • Patient-Rated Pain/Tenderness

    Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patients will rate pain/tenderness on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.

    2 weeks post-procedure

  • Patient-Rated Pain/Tenderness

    Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patients will rate pain/tenderness on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.

    4 weeks post-procedure

  • Patient-Rated Pain/Tenderness

    Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patients will rate pain/tenderness on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.

    3 months post-procedure

Study Arms (2)

Dyed Sutures

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) is an absorbable suture commonly utilized for cutaneous surgery; it is available in both dyed (violet) and undyed forms. This arm designates the Dyed Sutures.

Device: Polyglactin 910 (Dyed)

Undyed Sutures

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) is an absorbable suture commonly utilized for cutaneous surgery; it is available in both dyed (violet) and undyed forms. This arm designates the Undyed Sutures.

Device: Polyglactin 910 (Undyed)

Interventions

Half the wound for each participant will be sutured using Polyglactin 910 suture dyed (violet) with colorants such as D\&C Violet No. 2 present.

Dyed Sutures

Half the wound for each participant will be sutured using Polyglactin 910 suture Undyed

Undyed Sutures

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who are scheduled for a standard of care surgical excision

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

WVU Medicine Waynesburg Dermatology

Waynesburg, Pennsylvania, 15370-7010, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Sarah Camplbell, MD

    West Virginia University-Dermatology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2025

First Posted

July 22, 2025

Study Start

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion

January 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations