Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
Comparison of Patient Outcomes With Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose - This exploratory, split-wound study aims to evaluate the potential difference in skin reactions to two different types of sutures, dyed and undyed, used to close wounds after surgery. The study will assess whether dyed sutures to elicit increased tissue reactivity like redness, itching, and scarring and whether undyed sutures may be more optimal for wound healing and cosmetic response. Enrollment into the study and data collection is expected to take approximately 3-6 months. Follow-up visits will be chosen at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery, which is standard practice for monitoring healing and checking for complications such as infection or abnormal scarring. Primary Objective - The primary objective is to assess the response of wounds closed with both dyed and undyed sutures after cutaneous surgery to determine if there is a difference in wound healing and tissue reactivity with one compared to the other. Enrollment into the study and data collection is expected to take approximately 3-6 months. Follow-up visits will be chosen at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery, which is standard practice for monitoring healing and checking for complications such as infection or abnormal scarring.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedJuly 22, 2025
July 1, 2025
5 months
July 11, 2025
July 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (42)
Clinical Erythema Assessment scale
Erythema will be assessed on both sides of the surgical wound using a 0-4 Clinical Erythema Assessment scale: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe with 0 being the better outcome and 4 the worst.
2 weeks post-procedure
Clinical Erythema Assessment scale
Erythema will be assessed on both sides of the surgical wound using a 0-4 Clinical Erythema Assessment scale: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe with 0 being the better outcome and 4 the worst.
4 weeks post-procedure
Clinical Erythema Assessment scale
Erythema will be assessed on both sides of the surgical wound using a 0-4 Clinical Erythema Assessment scale: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe with 0 being the better outcome and 4 the worst.
3 months post-procedure
Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring
Percentage of the presence of hypertrophic scarring. Visual clinical assessment of each side of the wound will document the presence or absence of hypertrophic scarring (yes/no). A lower percentage of presence of hypertrophic scarring is better than higher.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring
Percentage of the presence of hypertrophic scarring. Visual clinical assessment of each side of the wound will document the presence or absence of hypertrophic scarring (yes/no). A lower percentage of presence of hypertrophic scarring is better than higher.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring
Percentage of the presence of hypertrophic scarring. Visual clinical assessment of each side of the wound will document the presence or absence of hypertrophic scarring (yes/no). A lower percentage of presence of hypertrophic scarring is better than higher.
3 months post-procedure
Presence of Suture Extrusion
Presence of Suture Extrusion: Wound evaluation will record whether sutures are visibly extruding from the skin (yes/no) on each side of the wound, to compare extrusion frequency (percentage of suture extrusion being present) between suture types.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Suture Extrusion
Presence of Suture Extrusion: Wound evaluation will record whether sutures are visibly extruding from the skin (yes/no) on each side of the wound, to compare extrusion frequency (percentage of suture extrusion being present) between suture types.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Suture Extrusion
Presence of Suture Extrusion: Wound evaluation will record whether sutures are visibly extruding from the skin (yes/no) on each side of the wound, to compare extrusion frequency (percentage of suture extrusion being present) between suture types.
3 Months post-procedure
Presence of Surgical Site Infection
Presence of Surgical Site Infection: Wound will be evaluated for signs of infection (e.g. erythema, exudate, tenderness) and recorded as yes/no to compare infection frequency (percentage of infection being present) between suture types.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Surgical Site Infection
Presence of Surgical Site Infection: Wound will be evaluated for signs of infection (e.g. erythema, exudate, tenderness) and recorded as yes/no to compare infection frequency (percentage of infection being present) between suture types.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Surgical Site Infection
Presence of Surgical Site Infection: Wound will be evaluated for signs of infection (e.g. erythema, exudate, tenderness) and recorded as yes/no to compare infection frequency (percentage of infection being present) between suture types.
3 Months post-procedure
Presence of Edema
Presence of Edema: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Edema
Presence of Edema: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Edema
Presence of Edema: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
3 months post-procedure
Presence of Wound Induration
Presence of Wound Induration: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Wound Induration
Presence of Wound Induration: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Wound Induration
Presence of Wound Induration: Wound will be evaluated for signs of edema and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
3 months post-procedure
Presence of Hyperpigmentation
Presence of Hyperpigmentation: Visual observation will determine whether increased pigmentation is present at the wound site and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Hyperpigmentation
Presence of Hyperpigmentation: Visual observation will determine whether increased pigmentation is present at the wound site and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Hyperpigmentation
Presence of Hyperpigmentation: Visual observation will determine whether increased pigmentation is present at the wound site and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
3 months post-procedure
Presence of Exudate
Presence of Exudate: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for exudate (fluid drainage) and recorded as yes/no to assess differences in wound response.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Exudate
Presence of Exudate: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for exudate (fluid drainage) and recorded as yes/no to assess differences in wound response.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Exudate
Presence of Exudate: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for exudate (fluid drainage) and recorded as yes/no to assess differences in wound response.
3 months post-procedure
Presence of Dehiscence
Presence of Dehiscence: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for dehiscence (any separation or opening) at the site of closure and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Dehiscence
Presence of Dehiscence: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for dehiscence (any separation or opening) at the site of closure and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Dehiscence
Presence of Dehiscence: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be checked for dehiscence (any separation or opening) at the site of closure and recorded as yes/no to compare frequency of presence between suture types.
3 months post-procedure
Failure to Epithelialize
Failure to Epithelialize: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be evaluated for failure to epithelialize (incomplete skin coverage) and recorded as yes/no to compare differences between suture types.
2 weeks post-procedure
Failure to Epithelialize
Failure to Epithelialize: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be evaluated for failure to epithelialize (incomplete skin coverage) and recorded as yes/no to compare differences between suture types.
4 weeks post-procedure
Failure to Epithelialize
Failure to Epithelialize: Each side of the wound (dyed and undyed) will be evaluated for failure to epithelialize (incomplete skin coverage) and recorded as yes/no to compare differences between suture types.
3 months post-procedure
Presence of Suture Granuloma
Presence of Suture Granuloma: Granuloma formation at the suture site will be visually identified and recorded as yes/no. Comparison will be made between dyed and undyed sides.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Suture Granuloma
Presence of Suture Granuloma: Granuloma formation at the suture site will be visually identified and recorded as yes/no. Comparison will be made between dyed and undyed sides.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Suture Granuloma
Presence of Suture Granuloma: Granuloma formation at the suture site will be visually identified and recorded as yes/no. Comparison will be made between dyed and undyed sides.
3 months post-procedure
Presence of Contact Dermatitis
Presence of Contact Dermatitis: Contact dermatitis will be assessed and graded on a standardized International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) grading scale: - (none), + (weak), ++ (strong), +++ (extreme), IR (irritant) with none being the best outcome. The grading will be used to compare reactions between the two suture types.
2 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Contact Dermatitis
Presence of Contact Dermatitis: Contact dermatitis will be assessed and graded on a standardized International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) grading scale: - (none), + (weak), ++ (strong), +++ (extreme), IR (irritant) with none being the best outcome. The grading will be used to compare reactions between the two suture types.
4 weeks post-procedure
Presence of Contact Dermatitis
Presence of Contact Dermatitis: Contact dermatitis will be assessed and graded on a standardized International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) grading scale: - (none), + (weak), ++ (strong), +++ (extreme), IR (irritant) with none being the best outcome. The grading will be used to compare reactions between the two suture types.
3 months post-procedure
Patient-Rated Pruritus
Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patient will rate itch severity on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.
2 weeks post-procedure
Patient-Rated Pruritus
Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patient will rate itch severity on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.
4 weeks post-procedure
Patient-Rated Pruritus
Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patient will rate itch severity on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.
3 months post-procedure
Patient-Rated Pain/Tenderness
Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patients will rate pain/tenderness on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.
2 weeks post-procedure
Patient-Rated Pain/Tenderness
Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patients will rate pain/tenderness on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.
4 weeks post-procedure
Patient-Rated Pain/Tenderness
Patient-Rated Pruritus: Patients will rate pain/tenderness on each side of the wound using a 0-3 scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe with 0=none being the better outcome.
3 months post-procedure
Study Arms (2)
Dyed Sutures
ACTIVE COMPARATORPolyglactin 910 (Vicryl) is an absorbable suture commonly utilized for cutaneous surgery; it is available in both dyed (violet) and undyed forms. This arm designates the Dyed Sutures.
Undyed Sutures
ACTIVE COMPARATORPolyglactin 910 (Vicryl) is an absorbable suture commonly utilized for cutaneous surgery; it is available in both dyed (violet) and undyed forms. This arm designates the Undyed Sutures.
Interventions
Half the wound for each participant will be sutured using Polyglactin 910 suture dyed (violet) with colorants such as D\&C Violet No. 2 present.
Half the wound for each participant will be sutured using Polyglactin 910 suture Undyed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are scheduled for a standard of care surgical excision
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are unable to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
WVU Medicine Waynesburg Dermatology
Waynesburg, Pennsylvania, 15370-7010, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah Camplbell, MD
West Virginia University-Dermatology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2025
First Posted
July 22, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share