Intraoral vs Extraoral Cementation of Zirconia Bridges on Ti-Bases: Microstrain Evaluation
Influence of Cementation Technique on Microstrain in Three-Unit Bridges on Ti-Bases Evaluated by Strain Gauges
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective clinical study compares two cementation techniques for implant-supported zirconia fixed partial dentures on titanium bases (Ti-bases): extraoral cementation performed on the working model and intraoral cementation performed chairside. Thirty clinical cases with two osseointegrated implants requiring a multi-unit zirconia restoration will be recruited at the UIC Dental Clinic. For each case, two restorations with identical design will be produced: one will be cemented extraorally (control) and an identical replica will be cemented intraorally (test). Micro-deformation will be assessed as peri-implant microstrain (µε) using a standardized strain-gauge setup and the same recording protocol for both techniques. The primary analysis compares microstrain between intraoral and extraoral cementation within each case; implant/prosthetic events will be recorded descriptively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
March 4, 2026
February 1, 2026
1 year
February 23, 2026
February 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peri-implant microstrain (µε) measured by strain gauges
Micro-deformation around implant replicas supporting a three-unit zirconia bridge on Ti-bases, recorded with bonded strain gauges and expressed as microstrain (µε). Measurements are obtained for both cementation techniques (extraoral vs intraoral) using the same standardized recording protocol. Measurements for the extraoral (control) restoration are recorded prior to delivery, and measurements for the intraoral (test) restoration are recorded approximately 1 week after chairside cementation once the restoration is received by the laboratory.
Pre-delivery (laboratory assessment) and ~1 week after intraoral cementation (7 ± 3 days).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difference in microstrain between techniques (paired within-case)
Pre-delivery (laboratory assessment) and ~1 week after intraoral cementation (7 ± 3 days).
Study Arms (2)
Extraoral cementation (laboratory)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThree-unit zirconia bridge cemented to Ti-bases extraorally on the working model under standardized laboratory conditions. Strain-gauge evaluation is performed in the laboratory prior to prosthesis delivery.
Intraoral cementation (chairside)
EXPERIMENTALAn identical three-unit zirconia bridge is cemented to Ti-bases intraorally following a standardized chairside protocol. The assembly is then removed and sent to the laboratory. Strain-gauge evaluation is performed approximately 1 week after intraoral cementation (7 ± 3 days).
Interventions
Extraoral (laboratory) cementation of a three-unit zirconia bridge to Ti-bases on the working model using a standardized protocol, with strain-gauge evaluation performed prior to prosthesis delivery.
Intraoral (chairside) cementation of an identical three-unit zirconia bridge to Ti-bases following a standardized protocol. The assembly is removed and sent to the laboratory, where strain-gauge evaluation is performed approximately 1 week later (7 ± 3 days).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (≥18 years old) in good general health.
- Presence of an edentulous space requiring rehabilitation with a three-unit implant-supported fixed bridge.
- Presence of two already osseointegrated Essential Cone implants (Klockner) indicated for a three-unit implant-supported restoration in the edentulous area.
- Ability and willingness to participate and attend study visits and follow-up.
- Signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- ASA III or ASA IV.
- Current or previous treatment with bisphosphonates.
- Smoking \>10 cigarettes/day.
- Extraction in the study area \<3 months before implant placement with incomplete healing.
- Guided bone regeneration in the study area with \<6 months of healing time.
- Signs of active periodontal disease (e.g., poor plaque control and/or bleeding on probing above acceptable levels).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clínica Universitària d'Odontologia UIC Barcelona
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, 08195, Spain
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
MARTA VALLES, DDS, PhD
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Blinding was not feasible. The evaluator knows which condition is being assessed because the extraoral (laboratory) cementation is evaluated first and the intraoral (chairside) cementation is evaluated afterwards; the two conditions are not assessed at the same time. To reduce bias, the same standardized strain-gauge setup and recording protocol are used for both measurements.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DDS, phD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2026
First Posted
March 4, 2026
Study Start
March 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared because this is a single-center academic study with a small sample size, and the dataset includes detailed case-level clinical and technical measurements. We will report the results in aggregate form in publications.