NCT07445373

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of WHO labour care guide (LCG) with the WHO modified partogragh in improving the maternal and fetal outcomes among primigravida and multigravida in active labour .the study evaluates whether use of the Labour care guide leads to improved labour monitoring ,timely clinical decision making and better maternal and neonatal outcomes .this study will answer either of the two questions that is

  • There is no difference in maternal and fetal outcomes between women monitored with Wo labour care guide (LCG) and those monitored with the Modified Partogragh
  • There is a difference in maternal and fetal outcomes between women monitored with the WHO Labour care guide (LCG) and those monitored the modified Partogragh .

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
114

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Dec 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 3, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2026

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2027

1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 3, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

January 31, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Duration of labour

    Total duration of labour measured from admission in active labour to delivery (in hours)

    From admission in active labour until delivery

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Mode of delivery

    )At the time of delivery

  • Neonatal condition at birth

    At birth and within 5 min after delivery

  • Neonatal intensive care unit admission (NICU)

    Within 24 hours after birth

  • Intrapartum maternal complications

    During labour and immediate portpartum period

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

Group A will be monitored using the WHO Labour Care Guide (LCG) for Intrapartum assessment and clinical decision-making from the active phase of labour until delivery.

Other: Group A (Intervention Arm): Monitoring with WHO Labour Care Guide)

Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

group B will be monitored using the WHO Modified Partograph for documentation and assessment of labor progress, maternal condition, and fetal well-being until delivery.

Other: Group B (Control Arm): Monitoring with Standard WHO Partograph)

Interventions

Group A (Intervention Arm): Monitoring with WHO Labour Care Guide) Women randomized to Group A will be monitored using the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide (LCG) as the intrapartum monitoring tool. The LCG incorporates evidence-based, individualized labour progress thresholds and emphasizes comprehensive maternal and fetal assessment. The following parameters will be recorded at recommended intervals: Cervical dilatation and labour progress Fetal heart rate Uterine contractions Maternal vital signs (pulse, blood pressure, temperature) Assessment of amniotic fluid Supportive care measures (oral intake, mobility, pain relief) Respectful maternity care indicators Clinical reassessment prompts embedded within the LCG will guide decision-making. No traditional alert or action lines will be used; instead, management will be individualized based on dynamic clinical assessment.

Group A

Women randomized to Group B will be monitored using the standard WHO-modified partograph as the intrapartum monitoring tool. The partograph will include: Cervical dilatation plotted against time Fetal heart rate monitoring Uterine contractions Maternal vital signs Status of membranes and liquor Labour progress will be assessed using the traditional alert and action lines, and clinical decisions (augmentation or operative intervention) will be taken according to institutional protocol based on partographic findings.

Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 40 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsThe study includes pregnant women in active labour; therefore, only female participants are eligible.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patient aged 20 to 40 years .
  • gestational age 37 to 42 weeks as per LMP.
  • parity UpTo 4
  • singketon pregnancy on ultrasound
  • patient presenating In labor as per operational definitons

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with breech presenation
  • pregnant women in whom trial of labor given outside the hospital,
  • women with complications like gestational diabetes,antepartum hemorrhage,severe preeclampsia/eclampsia and medical disorders complicating the pregnancy
  • premature rupture of membranes

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Khyber teacher hospital

Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Tolu LB, Jeldu WG, Feyissa GT. Effectiveness of utilizing the WHO safe childbirth checklist on improving essential childbirth practices and maternal and perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234320. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32530940BACKGROUND
  • Sama CB, Takah NF, Danwe VK, Melo UF, Dingana TN, Angwafo FF 3rd. Knowledge and utilization of the partograph: A cross-sectional survey among obstetric care providers in urban referral public health institutions in northwest and southwest Cameroon. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172860. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28234990BACKGROUND
  • Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.

    PMID: 28681500BACKGROUND
  • Lavender T, Cuthbert A, Smyth RM. Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 6;8(8):CD005461. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005461.pub5.

    PMID: 30080256BACKGROUND
  • Vogel JP, Pujar Y, Vernekar SS, Armari E, Pingray V, Althabe F, Gibbons L, Berrueta M, Somannavar M, Ciganda A, Rodriguez R, Bendigeri S, Kumar JA, Patil SB, Karinagannanavar A, Anteen RR, Mallappa Ramachandrappa P, Shetty S, Bommanal L, Haralahalli Mallesh M, Gaddi SS, Chikkagowdra S, Raghavendra B, Homer CSE, Lavender T, Kushtagi P, Hofmeyr GJ, Derman R, Goudar S. Effects of the WHO Labour Care Guide on cesarean section in India: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial. Nat Med. 2024 Feb;30(2):463-469. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02751-4. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

    PMID: 38291297BACKGROUND
  • Pandey D, Bharti R, Dabral A, Khanam Z. Impact of WHO Labor Care Guide on reducing cesarean sections at a tertiary center: an open-label randomized controlled trial. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Jul 20;2(3):100075. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100075. eCollection 2022 Aug.

    PMID: 36276791BACKGROUND
  • Vogel JP, Comrie-Thomson L, Pingray V, Gadama L, Galadanci H, Goudar S, Laisser R, Lavender T, Lissauer D, Misra S, Pujar Y, Qureshi ZP, Amole T, Berrueta M, Dankishiya F, Gwako G, Homer CSE, Jobanputra J, Meja S, Nigri C, Mohaptra V, Osoti A, Roberti J, Solomon D, Suleiman M, Robbers G, Sutherland S, Vernekar S, Althabe F, Bonet M, Oladapo OT. Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: A mixed-methods, multicountry evaluation. Birth. 2021 Mar;48(1):66-75. doi: 10.1111/birt.12511. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

    PMID: 33225484BACKGROUND
  • Maaloe N, van Roosmalen J, Dmello B, Kwast B, van den Akker T, Housseine N, Kujabi M, Meguid T, Kidanto H. WHO next-generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labour care? BJOG. 2022 Apr;129(5):682-684. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16914. Epub 2021 Sep 28. No abstract available.

    PMID: 34520112BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Dr Roshni Mumtaz, MBBS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of care providers and participants is not feasible.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Labour Care Guide group or the WHO modified partograph group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Training medical officer(i-e 2nd year resident )

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2026

First Posted

March 3, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 3, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations