Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Guide
AI/SSI
Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Guide to Prevent Surgical Site Infection Among Women Delivering Via Caesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-based educational guide to prevent surgical site infection among women delivering via cesarean section. Research hypotheses: H0: An artificial intelligence-based educational guide will not have any effect on reducing the rate of surgical site infection among women delivering via caesarean section. H1: An artificial intelligence-based educational guide will have a significant positive effect on reducing the rate of surgical site infection among women delivering via cesarean section. A purposive sample of 300 CS delivered women was divided randomly by using computer-generated randomization. into a control and intervention group, 150 women each. The control group received standard care. The intervention group received standard care plus the Artificial Intelligence guide
- After discharge, the researcher contacts study subjects every day by WhatsApp and phone call for any questions and to remind them of the upcoming follow-up visit.
- Women were asked to photograph the incision site and send it via WhatsApp using an end-to-end encrypted messaging platform to evaluate the wound condition. All photos were deleted immediately after completing the study for women's privacy.
- At the 10th postoperative day (±3 days), a follow-up was performed in the Outpatient Clinic because the majority of SSIs developed between POD5 and POD10, and due to the importance of timely identification and referral of SSIs.
- According to the study protocol, all women were followed until 30 days after CS. Follow-up was performed in the outpatient clinic, and post-CS SSI screening questions were asked, a physical examination of the patient and determined whether the patient had an SSI as per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2026
CompletedFebruary 27, 2026
February 1, 2026
8 months
February 13, 2026
February 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A structured interview Questionnaire
This questionnaire consists of two parts: Part one is to obtain information about cesarean section women's demographic and obstetric characteristics (Age, Residence, Obstetric characteristics, Parity, Gestational age, Labor before operation, Status of membrane) and phone number Part two: to obtain information about medical history (pre-existing conditions, diabetes mellitus, anemia, obesity, hypertension). Part three: to obtain information about cesarean section women's Operational characteristics (Type of the CS, Duration of CS, pre and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, Type of Abdominal incision, Post-operative hospital stay, Type of Anesthesia, intraoperative complications, Bleeding (\> 1000 ml), blood transfusion, duration of operation, days in hospital postoperatively, patients' medication list and from the discharge list
30 days after CS
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Criteria for defining surgical site infection (SSI). From US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC definition)(CDC, 2007).
30 days after CS
Study Arms (2)
AI intervention
EXPERIMENTAL* After discharge, the researcher contacts study subjects every day by WhatsApp and phone call for any questions and to remind them of the upcoming follow-up visit. * Women were asked to photograph the incision site and send it via WhatsApp using an end-to-end encrypted messaging platform to evaluate the wound condition. All photos were deleted immediately after completing the study for women's privacy. * At the postoperative day (±3 days), follow-up was performed in the Outpatient Clinic because the majority of SSIs developed between POD5 and POD10, and due to the importance of timely identification and referral of SSIs (Sway et al., 2019). * According to the study protocol all women were followed until 30 days after CS. Follow-up was performed in the Outpatient Clinic and post-CS SSI screening questions were asked. a physical examination of the patient was determined whether the patient had an SSI as per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition Gave all instruction
ordinary intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORwomen receive the usual nursing care
Interventions
The artifactual intelligence-based educational guide regarding cesarean section wound care provided for women after delivery and followed through with Daily educational messages, interactive dialogue, Reminders and alerts, Automated symptom checklists, and Photo-based wound monitoring
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women aged 20-60 years who delivered via cesarean section (CS).
- Own a smartphone with internet access.
- Have basic digital literacy, defined as the ability to use mobile applications, read text messages, and communicate via WhatsApp or similar platforms.
- Agree to participate voluntarily and provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Women with severe comorbid medical or psychiatric conditions that may affect their participation or comprehension.
- Women without smartphone access or with limited digital skills that prevent them from interacting with the AI-based educational guide.
- Women with communication difficulties (e.g., hearing or speech impairment) that hinder engagement with the intervention.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Nursing
Mansoura / Egypt, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Madiha HN Mohamed, professor
faculty of nursing Mansoura university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2026
First Posted
February 27, 2026
Study Start
February 17, 2025
Primary Completion
October 10, 2025
Study Completion
December 16, 2025
Last Updated
February 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share