Brief Emotion-Focused Therapy for Self-Criticism: A Comparison With a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approach
Efficacy of a Short-Term Emotion-Focused Therapy Intervention for Self-Criticism Compared With a Cognitive-Behavioral Gold Standard: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
95
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) is an effective approach in reducing self-criticism in adults. EFT will be compared with Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), a well-established treatment shown to be effective for a wide range of mental health difficulties. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- 1.Does EFT reduce self-criticism as effectively as CBT?
- 2.How do EFT and CBT compare in their impact on other mental health symptoms?
- 3.Receive a six-session, weekly online individual intervention (EFT or CBT), focused on reducing self-criticism.
- 4.Complete regular questionnaires during the intervention and at follow-up periods to track changes in self-criticism and other mental health symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 7, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2026
CompletedFebruary 25, 2026
February 1, 2026
9 months
February 10, 2026
February 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Level of Self-Criticism
Measured using the Forms of Self-Criticizing/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS). The FSCRS provides separate scores for Inadequate Self, Hated Self, and Reassured Self. Scores range from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate greater levels of the respective self-critical or self-reassuring tendencies. Reduction in the Inadequate Self and Hated Self subscales indicates improvement in self-criticism, while increases in Reassured Self indicate improvement in self-compassion.
T1) Baseline: Within 24 hours prior to Session 1. T2-T6) Pre-session assessment : Within 24 hours before each weekly session (i.e., before sessions 2-6). T7) Post-intervention: 1 week after Session 6. T8-T9) Follow-ups: 1 and 3 months after T7.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Global Symptomatology
T1) Baseline: Within 24 hours prior to Session 1 T2-T6) Pre-session assessment: Within 24 hours before each weekly session (i.e., before sessions 2-6) T7) Post-intervention: 1 week after finalizing Session 6 T8-T9) Follow-ups: 1 and 3 months after T7
Mental Health Continuum - Short Form (MHC-SF):
T1) Baseline: Within 24 hours prior to Session 1. T6) Within 24 hours before Session 6. T7) Post-intervention: 1 week after finalizing Session 6. T8-T9) Follow-up assessments: 1 and 3 months after T7.
Depressive symptomatology
T1) Baseline: Within 24 hours prior to Session 1 T2-T6) Pre-session: Within 24 hours before each weekly session (i.e., before Sessions 2-6) T7) Post-intervention: 1 week after Session 6 is finalized T8-T9) Follow-up assessments: 1 and 3 months after T7
Anxiety Symptomatology
T1) Baseline: Within 24 hours prior to Session 1. T2-T6) Pre-session: Within 24 hours before each weekly session (i.e., before Sessions 2-6). T7) Post-intervention: 1 week after Session 6 is finalized. T8-T9) Follow-up: 1 and 3 months after T7.
Self-Esteem
T1) Baseline: Within 24 hours prior to Session 1. T2-T6) Pre-session assessment : Within 24 hours before each weekly session (i.e., before sessions 2-6). T7) Post-intervention: 1 week after Session 6. T8-T9) Follow-ups: 1 and 3 months after T7.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Emotion Focused Therapy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive a six-session, weekly, online individual Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) intervention targeting self-criticism. The core of the intervention is the two-chair dialogue, which helps participants identify and process self-critical thoughts and emotions, promote emotional transformation, and integrate different aspects of the self.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will receive a six-session, weekly, online individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) intervention, focused on cognitive restructuring of self-critical thoughts. CBT is a well-established, gold-standard treatment for a broad range of mental health difficulties, and serves as an active comparator to evaluate the efficacy of the EFT intervention. The intervention helps participants identify maladaptive self-criticism, challenging underlying beliefs, and develop more adaptive thought patterns.
Interventions
Six weekly online individual sessions using Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with cognitive restructuring. The intervention helps participants identify maladaptive self-critical thoughts, examine underlying beliefs, and access more adaptive and constructive thought patterns. Techniques include thought monitoring, identification of cognitive biases, the downward arrow method to explore assumptions and core beliefs, Socratic dialogue, and various techniques to challenge maladaptive thoughts and beliefs and access more adaptive ones. The intervention aims to reduce self-criticism and related clinical symptoms and to improve psychological well-being. This arm serves as an active comparator to the Emotion-Focused Therapy intervention.
Six weekly online individual sessions using Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT), with a specific focus on the two-chair dialogue. The intervention addresses self-criticism as a marker of dysfunctional emotional processing, helping participants access and differentiate between the self-critical voice and the more vulnerable, experiencer self. Participants are guided to access and transform maladaptive emotional responses associated with self-criticism and integrate previously conflicting parts of the self. The intervention aims to soften maladaptive self-criticism, enhance emotional awareness, and promote overall well-being.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age over 18 years old
- Portuguese native speakers
- elevated self-critical processes
- perceived impact of the self-critical process on their daily functionality,
- availability to work with self-critical processes.
You may not qualify if:
- elevated dysfunctionality
- high risk factors (such as suicide risk)
- severe psychopathology, such as bipolar personality disorder, panic disorder, substance abuse, and personality disorders non adequate to a brief intervention previously identified.
- changes in the therapeutic plan with psychotropic medication in the last month, if currently taking psychotropic medication
- psychological treatment maintenance during the study implementation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Maia
Maia, 4475-690, Portugal
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
João Salgado, PhD
University of Maia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctoral Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2026
First Posted
February 25, 2026
Study Start
April 17, 2025
Primary Completion
January 7, 2026
Study Completion
January 7, 2026
Last Updated
February 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data from this study will not be shared publicly due to the sensitive nature of the psychological measures collected and to ensure participant confidentiality.