The Role of Priors in Hallucinatory Perception in Parkinson's Disease
LEAP-PARK
Exploratory Study on the Role of Prior Expectations in Hallucinatory Perceptions
3 other identifiers
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to better understand the mechanisms of hallucinations in patients with Parkinson's disease. The main question it aims to answer is: Do prior expectations increase the rate of false perceptions during a visual stimulus detection task more in Parkinson's disease patients with visual hallucinations compared to those without? Participants will undertake a computer task involving face detection and a battery of neuropsychological tests.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2026
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2028
February 27, 2026
February 1, 2026
2.6 years
February 12, 2026
February 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of Prior Expectations on False Alarm Rates in Parkinson's Disease Patients With and Without Visual Hallucinations
The primary outcome measures the false alarm rate during a visual stimulus detection task, specifically the percentage of trials in which participants report perceiving a stimulus when none was presented. The study will assess whether prior expectations (cues indicating the likelihood of a stimulus) increase false alarm rates more in Parkinson's disease patients with visual hallucinations compared to those without. The primary statistical analysis will test for an interaction effect (p \< 0.05) between cue (prior expectation), stimulus presence, and group (patients with vs. without hallucinations) using a generalized linear mixed model.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Comparison of False Alarm Rates Between Parkinson's Patients Without Hallucinations and Healthy Volunteers
Baseline
Impact of Prior Expectations on Perceptual Confidence in Parkinson's Disease Patients With and Without Visual Hallucinations
Baseline
Neuropsychological Profile Differences Between Parkinson's Patients With and Without Hallucinations
Baseline
Beta Power Differences in the Subthalamic Nucleus During False Alarms in Parkinson's Patients With Deep Brain Stimulation
Baseline
Study Arms (3)
Hallucinations
Patients with Parkinson's disease with hallucinations
No hallucinations
Patients with Parkinson's disease without hallucinations
Control group
Age and sex matched group of healthy participants
Eligibility Criteria
The study will recruit Parkinson's disease patients (disease duration ≥1 year, no major cognitive impairment) from CHU Grenoble-Alpes, including 15 with minor hallucinations (e.g., passage/presence sensations) and 15 with major hallucinations (e.g., complex visual hallucinations). Patients with active psychosis are excluded. Healthy volunteers (matched by age, gender, and education) will be recruited via ads in senior associations and affiliated institutions (CHUGA, GIN). Matching tolerates ±5 years for age and ±2 years for education; those without a high school diploma will be matched without strict education criteria. Ads may also appear on institutional websites.
You may qualify if:
- Adults diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (with or without visual hallucinations) or healthy volunteers.
- Age 18 - 85 years.
- Consent to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently participating in another clinical or therapeutic trial involving the testing of a drug treatment.
- Inability to perform cognitive tests due to:
- Non-psychiatric (somatic) conditions likely to affect cognitive abilities. Peripheral sensory or motor deficits. Acute clinical conditions (e.g., agitation, impaired consciousness).
- Diagnosis of dementia.
- Individuals covered by Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code (Code de la Santé Publique), including:
- Pregnant women, women in labor, or breastfeeding mothers. Individuals deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision. Individuals receiving psychiatric care under Articles L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1 (excluding those covered by Article L. 1121-8).
- Individuals admitted to a healthcare or social institution for purposes other than research.
- Minors or adults under legal guardianship or unable to express consent.
- \- Individuals with a hierarchical relationship to any professional involved in the study.
- Only for healthy volunteers:
- \- Personal history of diagnosed neurological disorders.
- \- Participants included in the study but found to have a MoCA score below 24 will be excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Grenoble University Hospitals
La Tronche, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Castrioto
University Hospital, Grenoble
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2026
First Posted
February 23, 2026
Study Start
March 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2028
Last Updated
February 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02