NCT07418827

Brief Summary

Haemophilia is a rare genetic disorder which, in its severe form and in the absence of treatment, can be life-threatening. Since the 1960s and the introduction of coagulation factor concentrates, the life expectancy of people with haemophilia has increased rapidly. Today, for most affected individuals, the disease is experienced as a chronic condition. The transition process enabling adolescents and young adults (AYA) with a chronic disease to move into adult life can be complex, as they must face all the changes experienced by AYA in general, combined with issues related to their chronic condition and its management. A successful transition involves a transfer of responsibility from parents to AYA regarding the management of their health condition, as well as the acquisition by AYA of knowledge, skills and autonomy. A difficult transition may lead to decreased adherence to follow-up or treatment, deterioration of overall health status and/or quality of life, or difficulties in entering adult life. In this context, the national cross-sectional study TRANSHEMO was initiated in 2017. Its objective was to compare adherence to healthcare management between two groups of AYA with severe haemophilia (adolescents \[for whom the transition is ongoing\] versus young adults \[for whom the transition may have been completed\]), and to identify the determinants of this adherence. The results showed that young adults had a lower adherence rate than adolescents (82.2% vs. 61.2%, p\<0.001). Among the determinants studied, being a young adult, having repeated at least one school year, and presenting psychological and emotional difficulties were factors that had a negative effect on adherence to healthcare management. However, the cross-sectional nature of the study represents a limitation that restricts causal inference. Complementing this project with a longitudinal study would address this limitation. The results obtained from this new study (TRANSHEMO 2) may contribute to the literature by providing insights into both the determinants of sustained adherence to healthcare management among adolescents with severe haemophilia who become young adults, and the associations between these determinants. The longitudinal design of the project will allow the establishment of a higher level of causal inference between the maintenance of adherence during the transition to adult life and its determinants, which represents a major epidemiological strength. Moreover, results addressing the issue of transition in the context of chronic diseases and derived from longitudinal studies remain scarce, making the findings of this project particularly original. Finally, haemophilia, a relatively frequent condition among rare diseases, could represent an interesting model for understanding the impact of transition in this type of pathology. Study hypothesis The extent of the reduction in adherence to healthcare during the transition process, and/or the determinants of the maintenance of adherence identified in the longitudinal TRANSHEMO 2 project, may differ from those highlighted in the original cross-sectional TRANSHEMO project. Specific aims Main objective: To compare the rate of adherence to healthcare among adolescents who participated in the TRANSHEMO project, using data collected during the original TRANSHEMO study when they were adolescents (before transition) and data to be collected as part of the TRANSHEMO 2 study when they have become young adults (after transition). Secondary objective: To identify the determinants of the maintenance of this adherence and the associations between these determinants, within the framework of a longitudinal study.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
12mo left

Started Feb 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

25 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress28%
Feb 2026Jun 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2026

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2026

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 18, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

January 26, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

haemophiliayoung adultcohort studygenetic disorderhealthcare management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Number of follow-up visits over the last 2 years (FranceCoag registry)

    Quantitative variable. Dichotomized in agreement and not in agreement with the recommended number

    1 day

  • Rate of Physician-reported adherence to clinical follow-up

    Ordinal variable in 5 modalities (Very high/High/Average/Low/Very low). Dichotomized in very high and high to very low.

    1 day

  • Rate of Patient-reported adherence to clinical follow-up

    Ordinal variable in 2 modalities : visiting Haemophilia Treatment Centre (HTC) at least once a year and Not visiting HTC every year.

    1 day

  • If under prophylaxis, number of prophylactic injections over the last 3 months (FranceCoag registry)

    Quantitative variable. Dichotomized in agreement and not in agreement with the recommended number.

    1 day

  • If under prophylaxis, rate of physician-reported adherence to prophylaxis

    Ordinal variable in 5 modalities (Very high/High/Average/Low/Very low). Dichotomized in very high and high to very low.

    1 day

  • Rate of Patient-reported adherence to treatment

    Nominal variable. If under prophylaxis: \- Dichotomized in having no difficulties in adherence to prophylaxis or having difficulties but missing treatment less than once a week and having difficulties and missing treatment once a week or more If under on-demand treatment: \- Dichotomized in having no difficulties in recognizing early signs of haemorrhage and having difficulties inrecognizing early signs of haemorrhage

    1 day

  • Physician-reported number of haemorrhagic events over the last two years

    Quantitative variable. Dichotomized in none and at least one

    1 day

  • Rate of composite endpoint

    A composite quantitative endpoint was created by adding the criteria described above (seven for people under prophylaxis, five for people under ondemandtreatment). Adherent peoplewere defined as those having 4 to 7 points if under prophylaxis, and as those having 3 to 5 points if underon-demand treatment. Dichotomized in adherent and non adherent

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Quality of life analysis

    1 day

  • Coping strategies analysis

    1 day

  • Autonomy analysis

    1 day

  • Time perspective analysis

    1 day

  • Family functioning analysis

    1 day

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

adolescents with severe hemophilia who participated in the TRANSHEMO project

Other: questionnaires

Interventions

Participants will have questionnaires

adolescents with severe hemophilia who participated in the TRANSHEMO project

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 29 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Young adults with severe haemophilia (haemophilia A or B)

You may qualify if:

  • Young adults who participated in the TRANSHEMO project during adolescence and who are currently aged 20-29 years;
  • Young adults with severe haemophilia (haemophilia A or B);
  • Young adults registered in the FranceCoag registry;
  • Young adults who have received the participant information sheet for the TRANSHEMO 2 project;
  • Young adults who did not object to participation in the present study.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with comprehension difficulties;
  • patients who are unable to read and/or write;
  • patients who express opposition to participation in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (25)

CHU La Reunion

Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France

Location

CH Annecy - St Julien

Annecy, France

Location

Chu de Bordeaux

Bordeaux, France

Location

Chu de Caen

Caen, France

Location

Centre hospitalier Métropole Savoie

Chambéry, France

Location

CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Location

Chu de Dijon

Dijon, France

Location

Chu de Grenoble

Grenoble, France

Location

CHRU de Lille

Lille, France

Location

CHU Limoges

Limoges, France

Location

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, France

Location

Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille

Marseille, France

Location

CH Montmorency

Montmorency, France

Location

CHU Montpellier

Montpellier, France

Location

Chu de Nancy

Nancy, France

Location

CHU Nantes

Nantes, France

Location

AP-HP (Hôpital Kremlin Bicetre)

Paris, France

Location

AP-HP (Hôpital NECKER)

Paris, France

Location

CHU Reims

Reims, France

Location

CHU de Rennes

Rennes, France

Location

CHU de Rouen

Rouen, France

Location

CHU St Etienne

Saint-Etienne, France

Location

CHU Strasbourg

Strasbourg, France

Location

CHU Toulouse

Toulouse, France

Location

CH Versailles

Versailles, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia AGenetic Diseases, Inborn

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood Coagulation Disorders, InheritedBlood Coagulation DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesCoagulation Protein DisordersHemorrhagic DisordersCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • François Cremieux

    AP-HM

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Noémie Resseguier, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2026

First Posted

February 18, 2026

Study Start

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 18, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Locations