NCT07413315

Brief Summary

The concept of renal rehabilitation has become increasingly important with the increasing age of patients with severe or even terminal chronic kidney disease (CKD). It combines physical exercise and nutritional monitoring programs for patients with terminal CKD who are most often treated with conventional hemodialysis (HD) at a rate of 3 sessions of 4 hours per week. Sarcopenia is a very common phenomenon in patients with CKD. The prevalence found in recent meta-analyses varies between 25.6 and 28.5% in patients treated with dialysis. It is even higher in patients treated with HD than in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Younger and more active patients will more often choose PD. The conventional HD modality preserves residual renal function less well, which is important for better elimination of uremic toxins bound to plasma proteins. Conventional HD requires a higher immobilization time and causes more post-dialysis symptoms, leaving less time for the patient to be physically active. The phenomenon of sarcopenia is not insignificant. It is associated in dialysis patients with a higher mortality rate (risk x 1.8) and a higher incidence of cardiovascular events (risk x 3.8). The association with higher mortality is well demonstrated for the 2 main components of sarcopenia, namely reduced muscle mass and reduced muscle strength. Sarcopenia also increases the risk of falls and fractures, it decreases the physical performance of patients and their ability to perform activities of daily living. The quality of life of patients is reduced and the probability of social placement is high. The phenomena of sarcopenia and physical deconditioning are even more problematic in patients in HD after an acute medical problem. The need for rehabilitation is even higher. "Classical" HD treatment can be a burden for these patients, leaving no room for integrating a complete rehabilitation program. Daily low dialysate flow rate hemodialysis (LDF) is a type of hemodialysis in which patients benefit from more frequent but shorter and hemodynamically better tolerated HD sessions. This new technique potentially presents certain advantages over conventional HD, particularly at the cardiovascular level: better blood pressure control and better reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy. LDF also allows better control of hyperphosphatemia with a reduced need for phosphorus binders. Thanks to more frequent dialysis (5 to 6 sessions per week), inter-dialytic weight gain is often less significant, allowing less aggressive ultrafiltration, with better hemodynamic tolerance, and better post-dialysis recovery. In this perspective, this study aims to examine the interest of integrating HDQ dialysis into a renal rehabilitation program in patients with terminal CKD whose dialysis must continue after an acute event requiring hospitalization. The investigators want to study whether this technique allows the implementation of a more effective rehabilitation program, while maintaining the same dialysis efficiency as with the conventional HD technique. To the investigator's knowledge, no study concerning patients under HDQ has been conducted during their renal rehabilitation phase. The objectives of the current study are:

  • To study the interest of integrating HDQ dialysis into a renal rehabilitation program in patients with terminal CKD.
  • To study the efficacy and tolerance of HDQ dialysis and the rehabilitation program in these patients.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
19mo left

Started Aug 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress54%
Aug 2024Dec 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 13, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2026

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

November 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Hand grip test

    Grip strength (measured by means of a dynamometer) is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength. Low grip strength is a powerful predictor of poor patient outcomes such as longer hospital stays, increased functional limitations, poor health-related quality of life and death. Cut-off points for men \<27 kg Cut-off points for women \<16 kg

    At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  • Hand grip test

    Grip strength (measured by means of a dynamometer) is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength. Low grip strength is a powerful predictor of poor patient outcomes such as longer hospital stays, increased functional limitations, poor health-related quality of life and death. Cut-off points for men \<27 kg Cut-off points for women \<16 kg

    At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Short physical performance battery test (SPPB)

    At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  • Short physical performance battery test (SPPB)

    At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  • Six minutes walking test (6 MWT)

    At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  • Six minutes walking test (6 MWT)

    At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  • Muscle ultrasound conclusion

    At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Hemodialysis patients

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients under hemodialysis

Procedure: Low flow rate hemodialysisOther: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation program

Interventions

Low flow rate hemodialysis five times per week

Hemodialysis patients

Tailor made rehabilitation program

Hemodialysis patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patient with terminal chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis treatment
  • patient recently hospitalized for an acute medical event.

You may not qualify if:

  • dementia/mild cognitive impairment (MMSE \< 20/30)
  • decompensated psychiatric pathology and/or behavioral disorders
  • pregnant woman
  • recovery of renal function allowing interruption of helodialysis sessions
  • candidate for neurological rehabilitation
  • patient with recent spinal cord injury
  • patient with absolute and/or relative contraindication to performing a stress test
  • severe or poorly tolerated cardiac rhythm disorder
  • severe or symptomatic obstruction to left ventricular ejection
  • decompensated heart failure
  • acute myocarditis, pericarditis or endocarditis
  • acute aortic dissection
  • high-risk emboligenic intracardiac thrombus
  • significant stenosis of the common trunk
  • ventricular aneurysm
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Brugmann

Brussels, 1020, Belgium

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sarcopenia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular AtrophyNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAtrophyPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Joris Vanparys, MD

    CHU Brugmann

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of clinical trial unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2025

First Posted

February 17, 2026

Study Start

August 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations