NCT07411898

Brief Summary

Patients referred for pelvic reconstructive surgery frequently present with combined anterior and apical vaginal wall prolapse. Previous studies found that anterior compartment involvement is the most common and serious defect that occurs with an apical defect. To address this, many surgeons will conduct concomitant surgeries in addition to sacrocolpopexy or pectopexy. This prospective pilot study was conducted to explore the surgical outcomes and safety of an innovative laparoscopic uterine pectopexy technique using inverted T-meshes for simultaneous apical and anterior vaginal repair.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
67

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
4mo left

Started Aug 2020

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress95%
Aug 2020Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 26, 2020

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 29, 2024

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 2, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2026

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

February 2, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Pelvic organ prolapsePectopexySacrocolpopexy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse Anatomical Outcome

    Anatomic outcomes were assessed by evaluating the pre- and post-operative prolapse stages as evaluated by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. The plane of the hymen was defined as zero, all measures are in centimeters proximal (negative number) and distal (positive number) to the hymen. The more positive the number, the more severe the prolapse.

    1 year post-operation

  • Rate of distress caused by pelvic floor symptoms

    These outcomes were assessed pre- and post-operation via the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire. Higher scores indicated greater symptom distress.

    1 year post-operation

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Rate of surgical complications

    1 year post-operation

  • Rate of Reoperations

    1 year post-operation

Study Arms (2)

Pectopexy

Laparoscopic pectopexy with inverted T-mesh for concomitant anterior and apical vaginal prolapse repair

Procedure: Laparoscopic pectopexy

Sacrocolpopexy

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with double mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair

Procedure: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

Interventions

Laparoscopic pectopexy with inverted T-mesh for concomitant apical and anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair

Pectopexy

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with double mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair

Sacrocolpopexy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsFemale with female pelvic organs
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Women with a symptomatic uterine prolapse ≧ POP-Q stage 2 in patients who wished to retain the uterus and who were willing to undergo surgical pelvic organ prolapse repair.

You may qualify if:

  • Presentation with a symptomatic uterine prolapse ≧ POP-Q stage 2 in patients who wished to retain the uterus

You may not qualify if:

  • No known uterine or cervical pathology, no previous prolapse mesh repair, and no diseases known to affect bladder or bowel function

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

Taichung, 40201, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Biler A, Ertas IE, Tosun G, Hortu I, Demir A, Taner CE, Ozeren M, Sendag F. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, sacrospinous ligament fixation, and iliococcygeus fixation procedures. Turk J Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;48(3):602-610. doi: 10.3906/sag-1712-203.

    PMID: 29914258BACKGROUND
  • Chuang FC, Chou YM, Wu LY, Yang TH, Chen WH, Huang KH. Laparoscopic pectopexy: the learning curve and comparison with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04934-4. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

    PMID: 34406417BACKGROUND
  • Akladios CY, Dautun D, Saussine C, Baldauf JJ, Mathelin C, Wattiez A. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for female genital organ prolapse: establishment of a learning curve. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Apr;149(2):218-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

    PMID: 20096499BACKGROUND
  • Grinstein E, Abdelkhalek Y, Veit-Rubin N, Gluck O, Deval B. Long term outcomes of laparoscopic sacro/colpo-hysteropexy with and without rectopexy for the treatment of prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04868-x. Epub 2021 Jun 14.

    PMID: 34125240BACKGROUND
  • Kotani Y, Murakamsi K, Kai S, Yahata T, Kanto A, Matsumura N. Comparison of Surgical Results and Postoperative Recurrence Rates by Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Other Surgical Procedures for Managing Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Nov 5;10(4):221-225. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_127_20. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.

    PMID: 34909379BACKGROUND
  • Maher C, Yeung E, Haya N, Christmann-Schmid C, Mowat A, Chen Z, Baessler K. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 26;7(7):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2.

    PMID: 37493538BACKGROUND
  • Yang E, Tsai CP, Shen PS, Ying TH, Lee TH, Chen GD, Liao YH, Hung MJ. One-year outcomes of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy procedure using inverted T-mesh for treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse. Sci Rep. 2026 Feb 26. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-40730-0. Online ahead of print.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Division of Gynecological Minimally Invasive Therapy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2026

First Posted

February 17, 2026

Study Start

August 26, 2020

Primary Completion

April 29, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Locations