To Explore the Surgical Outcomes and Safety of an Innovative Laparoscopic Uterine Pectopexy Technique Using Inverted T-meshes for Simultaneous Apical and Anterior Vaginal Repair.
One-year Outcomes of an Innovative Laparoscopic Pectopexy Procedure Using Inverted T-mesh for Treatment of Advanced Uterine and Anterior Vaginal Prolapse.
1 other identifier
observational
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients referred for pelvic reconstructive surgery frequently present with combined anterior and apical vaginal wall prolapse. Previous studies found that anterior compartment involvement is the most common and serious defect that occurs with an apical defect. To address this, many surgeons will conduct concomitant surgeries in addition to sacrocolpopexy or pectopexy. This prospective pilot study was conducted to explore the surgical outcomes and safety of an innovative laparoscopic uterine pectopexy technique using inverted T-meshes for simultaneous apical and anterior vaginal repair.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 26, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
ExpectedFebruary 17, 2026
February 1, 2026
3.7 years
February 2, 2026
February 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Anatomical Outcome
Anatomic outcomes were assessed by evaluating the pre- and post-operative prolapse stages as evaluated by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. The plane of the hymen was defined as zero, all measures are in centimeters proximal (negative number) and distal (positive number) to the hymen. The more positive the number, the more severe the prolapse.
1 year post-operation
Rate of distress caused by pelvic floor symptoms
These outcomes were assessed pre- and post-operation via the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire. Higher scores indicated greater symptom distress.
1 year post-operation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rate of surgical complications
1 year post-operation
Rate of Reoperations
1 year post-operation
Study Arms (2)
Pectopexy
Laparoscopic pectopexy with inverted T-mesh for concomitant anterior and apical vaginal prolapse repair
Sacrocolpopexy
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with double mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair
Interventions
Laparoscopic pectopexy with inverted T-mesh for concomitant apical and anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with double mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair
Eligibility Criteria
Women with a symptomatic uterine prolapse ≧ POP-Q stage 2 in patients who wished to retain the uterus and who were willing to undergo surgical pelvic organ prolapse repair.
You may qualify if:
- Presentation with a symptomatic uterine prolapse ≧ POP-Q stage 2 in patients who wished to retain the uterus
You may not qualify if:
- No known uterine or cervical pathology, no previous prolapse mesh repair, and no diseases known to affect bladder or bowel function
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40201, Taiwan
Related Publications (7)
Biler A, Ertas IE, Tosun G, Hortu I, Demir A, Taner CE, Ozeren M, Sendag F. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, sacrospinous ligament fixation, and iliococcygeus fixation procedures. Turk J Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;48(3):602-610. doi: 10.3906/sag-1712-203.
PMID: 29914258BACKGROUNDChuang FC, Chou YM, Wu LY, Yang TH, Chen WH, Huang KH. Laparoscopic pectopexy: the learning curve and comparison with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04934-4. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
PMID: 34406417BACKGROUNDAkladios CY, Dautun D, Saussine C, Baldauf JJ, Mathelin C, Wattiez A. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for female genital organ prolapse: establishment of a learning curve. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Apr;149(2):218-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
PMID: 20096499BACKGROUNDGrinstein E, Abdelkhalek Y, Veit-Rubin N, Gluck O, Deval B. Long term outcomes of laparoscopic sacro/colpo-hysteropexy with and without rectopexy for the treatment of prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04868-x. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
PMID: 34125240BACKGROUNDKotani Y, Murakamsi K, Kai S, Yahata T, Kanto A, Matsumura N. Comparison of Surgical Results and Postoperative Recurrence Rates by Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Other Surgical Procedures for Managing Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Nov 5;10(4):221-225. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_127_20. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
PMID: 34909379BACKGROUNDMaher C, Yeung E, Haya N, Christmann-Schmid C, Mowat A, Chen Z, Baessler K. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 26;7(7):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2.
PMID: 37493538BACKGROUNDYang E, Tsai CP, Shen PS, Ying TH, Lee TH, Chen GD, Liao YH, Hung MJ. One-year outcomes of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy procedure using inverted T-mesh for treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse. Sci Rep. 2026 Feb 26. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-40730-0. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41741609DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Division of Gynecological Minimally Invasive Therapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2026
First Posted
February 17, 2026
Study Start
August 26, 2020
Primary Completion
April 29, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02