Prospective Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Calistar S for Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
CASPO
Prospective, Multicenter, 60 Months, Single Arm Cohort Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Ultra-Light-Weight Mesh CAlistar S in Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Prospective long-term evaluation of the performance and safety of Calistar S for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair in women with anterior POP with or without apical vaginal involvement
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2029
November 22, 2024
November 1, 2024
5.6 years
January 10, 2019
November 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients with Cure of pelvic organ prolapse
Number of patients accomplishing the composite endpoint after 24 months including anatomic, subjective and retreatment components
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Change of prolapse specific quality of life according the validated Questionnaire Prolapse quality of life questionnaire in comparison between baseline and follow-up
Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Change of sexual life according the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire in comparison between Baseline and follow-up
Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Change of pain according Visual Analog Scale of Pain in comparison between baseline, postoperative and follow-up
Baseline, 24-48h postoperatively, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Patients subjective evaluation of satisfaction with surgery according the Patient Global Impression of Improvement
6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Patient subjective evaluation of POP severity according the Global Impression of Severity
Baseline
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Calistar S
EXPERIMENTALSingle arm cohort trial
Interventions
synthetic mesh for anterior pelvic organ prolapse with or without apical vaginal wall involvement via the vaginal route in a highly selected patient population
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Subjects with recurrent prolapse or complex primary prolapse are eligible for the study.
- \. Scheduled mesh-augmented anterior POP repair with Calistar S 5. Signed inform consent
You may not qualify if:
- Fertile women
- Patients with active or latent infection of the vagina, cervix or uterus
- Patients with previous or current vaginal, cervical or uterine cancer
- Previous, current or planned pelvic radiation therapy
- Known allergy to polypropylene
- \. Subject is unable or unwilling to complete questionnaires (either self-administered, assisted or interviewed) and/or to follow scheduled visits and/or to sign informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Promedonlead
Study Sites (6)
Helios Hospital Erfurt, Department of gynaecology
Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany
St. Hedwig Hospital
Berlin, Germany
Evangelic Diakonie Hospital
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
St. Elisabeth-Hospital Leipzig
Leipzig, Germany
Hospital Tettnang
Tettnang, Germany
University Hospital Tübingen
Tübingen, Germany
Related Publications (16)
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.
PMID: 9083302BACKGROUNDWu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286.
PMID: 24807341BACKGROUNDWu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Markland AD. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):141-148. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057.
PMID: 24463674BACKGROUNDHendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1160-6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123819.
PMID: 12066091BACKGROUNDMant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May;104(5):579-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11536.x.
PMID: 9166201BACKGROUNDRisk factors for genital prolapse in non-hysterectomized women around menopause. Results from a large cross-sectional study in menopausal clinics in Italy. Progetto Menopausa Italia Study Group. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 Dec;93(2):135-40.
PMID: 11074133BACKGROUNDBarber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;185(6):1388-95. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118659.
PMID: 11744914BACKGROUNDBarber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
PMID: 16021067BACKGROUNDLenz F, Stammer H, Brocker K, Rak M, Scherg H, Sohn C. Validation of a German version of the P-QOL Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jun;20(6):641-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0809-x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
PMID: 19214361BACKGROUNDDigesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S. P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 May-Jun;16(3):176-81; discussion 181. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1225-x. Epub 2004 Oct 21.
PMID: 15875234BACKGROUNDRogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Aug;14(3):164-8; discussion 168. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1063-2. Epub 2003 Jul 25.
PMID: 12955337BACKGROUNDWong DL, Baker CM. Smiling faces as anchor for pain intensity scales. Pain. 2001 Jan;89(2-3):295-300. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00375-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 11291631BACKGROUNDBump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.
PMID: 8694033BACKGROUNDVittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
PMID: 17182981BACKGROUNDDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PMID: 15273542BACKGROUNDPractice Bulletin No. 176: Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):e56-e72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002016.
PMID: 28333818BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gert Naumann, PD Dr.habil.
Helios Hospital Erfurt
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ralf Tunn, Prof.Dr.
St. Hedwig Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dirk Watermann, Prof.Dr.
Evangelic Diakonie Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Birgit Henne, Dr.med.
St. Elisabeth-Hospital Leipzig
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christl Reisenauer, Prof.Dr.med.
University Hospital Tübingen
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Fünfgeld, Dr.med.
Hospital Tettnang
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Blinded POP-Q Examination: The POP-Q examination will be performed by a physician different to the corresponding surgeon
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2019
First Posted
January 29, 2019
Study Start
March 10, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2029
Last Updated
November 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share