NCT03821142

Brief Summary

Prospective long-term evaluation of the performance and safety of Calistar S for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair in women with anterior POP with or without apical vaginal involvement

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
40mo left

Started Mar 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress62%
Mar 2021Oct 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 10, 2019

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2019

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 10, 2021

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2026

Expected
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2029

Last Updated

November 22, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5.6 years

First QC Date

January 10, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

surgical meshsurgeryTherapypelvic floor disorderscystocele

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Patients with Cure of pelvic organ prolapse

    Number of patients accomplishing the composite endpoint after 24 months including anatomic, subjective and retreatment components

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Change of prolapse specific quality of life according the validated Questionnaire Prolapse quality of life questionnaire in comparison between baseline and follow-up

    Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

  • Change of sexual life according the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire in comparison between Baseline and follow-up

    Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

  • Change of pain according Visual Analog Scale of Pain in comparison between baseline, postoperative and follow-up

    Baseline, 24-48h postoperatively, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

  • Patients subjective evaluation of satisfaction with surgery according the Patient Global Impression of Improvement

    6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

  • Patient subjective evaluation of POP severity according the Global Impression of Severity

    Baseline

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Calistar S

EXPERIMENTAL

Single arm cohort trial

Device: Transvaginal mesh for anterior pelvic organ prolapse repair

Interventions

synthetic mesh for anterior pelvic organ prolapse with or without apical vaginal wall involvement via the vaginal route in a highly selected patient population

Calistar S

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Subjects with recurrent prolapse or complex primary prolapse are eligible for the study.
  • \. Scheduled mesh-augmented anterior POP repair with Calistar S 5. Signed inform consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Fertile women
  • Patients with active or latent infection of the vagina, cervix or uterus
  • Patients with previous or current vaginal, cervical or uterine cancer
  • Previous, current or planned pelvic radiation therapy
  • Known allergy to polypropylene
  • \. Subject is unable or unwilling to complete questionnaires (either self-administered, assisted or interviewed) and/or to follow scheduled visits and/or to sign informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Helios Hospital Erfurt, Department of gynaecology

Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany

Location

St. Hedwig Hospital

Berlin, Germany

Location

Evangelic Diakonie Hospital

Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Location

St. Elisabeth-Hospital Leipzig

Leipzig, Germany

Location

Hospital Tettnang

Tettnang, Germany

Location

University Hospital Tübingen

Tübingen, Germany

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.

    PMID: 9083302BACKGROUND
  • Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286.

    PMID: 24807341BACKGROUND
  • Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Markland AD. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):141-148. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057.

    PMID: 24463674BACKGROUND
  • Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1160-6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123819.

    PMID: 12066091BACKGROUND
  • Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May;104(5):579-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11536.x.

    PMID: 9166201BACKGROUND
  • Risk factors for genital prolapse in non-hysterectomized women around menopause. Results from a large cross-sectional study in menopausal clinics in Italy. Progetto Menopausa Italia Study Group. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 Dec;93(2):135-40.

    PMID: 11074133BACKGROUND
  • Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;185(6):1388-95. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118659.

    PMID: 11744914BACKGROUND
  • Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.

    PMID: 16021067BACKGROUND
  • Lenz F, Stammer H, Brocker K, Rak M, Scherg H, Sohn C. Validation of a German version of the P-QOL Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jun;20(6):641-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0809-x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

    PMID: 19214361BACKGROUND
  • Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S. P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 May-Jun;16(3):176-81; discussion 181. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1225-x. Epub 2004 Oct 21.

    PMID: 15875234BACKGROUND
  • Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Aug;14(3):164-8; discussion 168. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1063-2. Epub 2003 Jul 25.

    PMID: 12955337BACKGROUND
  • Wong DL, Baker CM. Smiling faces as anchor for pain intensity scales. Pain. 2001 Jan;89(2-3):295-300. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00375-4. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11291631BACKGROUND
  • Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.

    PMID: 8694033BACKGROUND
  • Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052. Epub 2006 Dec 20.

    PMID: 17182981BACKGROUND
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND
  • Practice Bulletin No. 176: Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):e56-e72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002016.

    PMID: 28333818BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapsePelvic Floor DisordersCystocele

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesPregnancy ComplicationsMale Urogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Gert Naumann, PD Dr.habil.

    Helios Hospital Erfurt

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ralf Tunn, Prof.Dr.

    St. Hedwig Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dirk Watermann, Prof.Dr.

    Evangelic Diakonie Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Birgit Henne, Dr.med.

    St. Elisabeth-Hospital Leipzig

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Christl Reisenauer, Prof.Dr.med.

    University Hospital Tübingen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Christian Fünfgeld, Dr.med.

    Hospital Tettnang

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Blinded POP-Q Examination: The POP-Q examination will be performed by a physician different to the corresponding surgeon
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Calistar S Single Incision POP System
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2019

First Posted

January 29, 2019

Study Start

March 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2029

Last Updated

November 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations