Analysis of Factors Associated With the Efficacy of 595-nm Pulsed Dye Laser Treatment for Rosacea
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was designed as a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial and included 80 patients with rosacea treated at the Department of Dermatology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital. All patients received pulsed dye laser therapy (pulsed dye laser system; Cynosure (Beijing) Medical Technology Co., Ltd., China). Treatment energy was adjusted according to individual clinical responses, with no concomitant therapies administered. All patients were informed of study-related precautions and provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. Each patient underwent a single session of bilateral facial 595-nm pulsed dye laser treatment with randomized pulse durations of 6 ms or 10 ms, using a fluence of 9-11 J/cm² and a 7-mm spot size, followed by post-treatment epidermal cooling. Skin imaging was performed at baseline and at 1 month after treatment. At 3 and 7 days post-treatment, erythema improvement, pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and adverse events were assessed using questionnaires. At 1 month, treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated based on erythema improvement, patient satisfaction, Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) score, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score, Rosacea Area and Severity Index (RASI) score, skin imaging analysis, and adverse event records.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2026
CompletedFebruary 17, 2026
February 1, 2026
10 months
February 8, 2026
February 13, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) score
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) scale Scores 0= clear Clear skin with no signs of erythema 1 = Almost clear Slight redness; almost clear 2=mild Definite redness; mild erythema 3 = moderate Marked redness; moderate erythema 4= severe Fiery redness; severe erythema This scale assesses the average facial erythema condition over 24 hours.For CEA scoring, which were evaluated masked by two well-trained dermatologists. when two dermatologists have different scores, the one with the higher score will be included in the statistics
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
6ms-pulse group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10ms-pulse group
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The PDL (595 nm, VBeam, Candela/Syneron, Wayland, MA) settings were: Energy range, 9-11 J/cm2\[Y7.1\]; spot size, 7 mm; pulse duration, 6ms; with a dynamic spray cooling device was used during this study.
The PDL (595 nm, VBeam, Candela/Syneron, Wayland, MA) settings were: Energy range, 9-11 J/cm2\[Y7.1\]; spot size, 7 mm; pulse duration, 10ms; with a dynamic spray cooling device was used during this study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- participants aged 20-60 years with a clinical diagnosis of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea, in otherwise good general health, who provided written informed consent and agreed to complete the study procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- active infection at the treatment site;
- a history of keloid formation or a tendency to develop keloids;
- a history of photosensitivity disorders;
- facial laser treatment, chemical peeling, or facial surgery within the past 3 months;
- pregnancy or breastfeeding;
- concomitant treatment for rosacea;
- participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to screening;
- any other condition deemed by the investigator to make the subject unsuitable for participation;
- presence of other facial inflammatory skin diseases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2026
First Posted
February 13, 2026
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02