NCT07400718

Brief Summary

This clinical study, titled "Head-to-Head Comparison Study between Different FDA Registered Allergy Skin Test Applicators," aims to compare the reliability and clinical performance of three skin prick test (SPT) devices: Allertest™ Multiple Skin Test Applicator, Lincoln Multi-Test II, and Greer Skintestor OMNI Applicator. The primary objective is to evaluate the consistency and accuracy of these devices in allergy testing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 12, 2025

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 3, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 10, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

18 days

First QC Date

February 3, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Allergy skin testingSkin prick testMulti-head skin test deviceDevice comparisonDiagnostic accuracySensitivity and specificityIntra-device variability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Procedural pain assessed immediately after device application using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents unspeakable pain. Lower scores indicate less pain and better tolerability.

    Immediately after device application (within 1 minute of skin test procedure)

  • Sensitivity (Histamine Positive Control Performance)

    Proportion of histamine control sites producing wheal ≥3 mm diameter at 15 minutes post-application. A wheal of ≥3 mm is the standard threshold for a positive allergic reaction. Higher sensitivity indicates better device performance in reliably eliciting positive control responses. Calculated as: (number of histamine sites with wheal ≥3 mm) / (total number of histamine sites tested) × 100%.

    15 minutes after device application

  • Specificity (Glycerin Negative Control Performance)

    Proportion of glycerin control sites producing wheal \<3 mm diameter at 15 minutes post-application. Glycerin should not produce a wheal response; a result \<3 mm confirms appropriate negative control performance and absence of non-specific mechanical irritation. Higher specificity indicates better device performance. Calculated as: (number of glycerin sites with wheal \<3 mm) / (total number of glycerin sites tested) × 100%.

    15 minutes after device application

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Intra-Device Variability

    15 minutes after device application

  • Mean Histamine Wheal Size

    15 minutes after device application

  • Mean Glycerin Wheal Size

    15 minutes after device application

  • Proportion of Subjects with Clinically Significant Pain

    Immediately after device application (within 1 minute of skin test procedure)

Study Arms (2)

AllerTest Device

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive percutaneous allergy skin testing using an AllerTest multi-head device (either AllerTest-10 or AllerTest-8, manufactured by MedScience Research Group, Inc., distributed by ALK Abello, Inc.). The device is applied to one randomized forearm with a standardized histamine positive control (10 mg/mL histamine base) and a glycerin negative control (50% glycerin in saline). Outcomes measured include procedural pain (VAS 0-10), histamine wheal size at 15 minutes, glycerin wheal size at 15 minutes, sensitivity (proportion of histamine sites ≥3 mm), specificity (proportion of glycerin sites \<3 mm), and intra-device variability (coefficient of variation across test heads).

Device: AllerTest-10 Multi-Head Skin Test DeviceDevice: AllerTest-8 Multi-Head Skin Test Device

Comparator Device

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants receive percutaneous allergy skin testing using a comparator multi-head device (either Skintestor OMNI manufactured by Greer Laboratories, Inc., or Multi-Test II manufactured by Lincoln Diagnostics, Inc.). The device is applied simultaneously to the opposite forearm with identical standardized histamine positive control (10 mg/mL histamine base) and glycerin negative control (50% glycerin in saline). The same outcomes are measured to enable direct paired comparison: procedural pain (VAS 0-10), histamine wheal size at 15 minutes, glycerin wheal size at 15 minutes, sensitivity, specificity, and intra-device variability.

Device: Skintestor OMNI Multi-Head Skin Test DeviceDevice: Multi-Test II Multi-Head Skin Test Device

Interventions

FDA-cleared 10-head percutaneous skin test applicator manufactured by MedScience Research Group, Inc., distributed by ALK Abello, Inc. The device consists of 10 individual test heads arranged in a linear array, each with a standardized needle length designed to penetrate the epidermis without drawing blood. Applied with standardized pressure for simultaneous delivery of 10 test substances (histamine and glycerin controls in this study). Single-use, disposable device.

Also known as: AllerTest 10-head
AllerTest Device

FDA-cleared 10-head percutaneous skin test applicator manufactured by Greer Laboratories, Inc. The device consists of 10 individual test heads arranged in a linear array for simultaneous application of multiple allergens and controls. Applied with standardized pressure for delivery of histamine and glycerin controls in this study. Single-use, disposable device.

Comparator Device

FDA-cleared 8-head percutaneous skin test applicator manufactured by Lincoln Diagnostics, Inc. The device consists of 8 individual test heads arranged in a linear array for simultaneous application of multiple allergens and controls. Applied with standardized pressure for delivery of histamine and glycerin controls in this study. Single-use, disposable device.

Comparator Device

FDA-cleared 8-head percutaneous skin test applicator manufactured by MedScience Research Group, Inc., distributed by ALK Abello, Inc. The device consists of 8 individual test heads arranged in a linear array, each with a standardized needle length designed to penetrate the epidermis without drawing blood. Applied with standardized pressure for simultaneous delivery of 8 test substances (histamine and glycerin controls in this study). Single-use, disposable device.

AllerTest Device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients will be entered into this study only if they meet all of the following criteria:
  • Written and signed informed consent obtained before starting any protocol-specific procedures.
  • Subjects willing to withhold antihistamines, Leukotriene antagonists and H2 antagonists for at least 1 week before testing to avoid masking the histamine reactions on the skin.
  • Male or female between 18 to 60 65 years, inclusive.
  • Ability to comply with the study procedures and visit schedule.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients will NOT be entered into this study if they meet any of the following criteria:
  • Anaphylactic reaction (constitutional) after the previous skin test with the same allergen
  • Acute fever
  • Systemic disease with acute manifestation or decompensation
  • Abnormal skin condition in the area to be tested (such as eczema sunburn condition after sunbathing)
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of dermatographism, severe atopic dermatitis, or use of tricyclic antidepressants.
  • Current use of beta-blockers
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of the test solutions (histamine or glycerin).
  • Participation in another clinical study within 30 days before enrollment. Participation in another clinical study within 30 days before enrollment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

QHS Health center

Miami, Florida, 33155, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Platts-Mills TA, Woodfolk JA. Rise in asthma cases. Science. 1997 Nov 7;278(5340):1001. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5340.997c. No abstract available.

  • Arbes SJ Jr, Gergen PJ, Elliott L, Zeldin DC. Prevalences of positive skin test responses to 10 common allergens in the US population: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Aug;116(2):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.017.

  • Cox L, Williams B, Sicherer S, Oppenheimer J, Sher L, Hamilton R, Golden D; American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Test Task Force; American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Specific IgE Test Task Force. Pearls and pitfalls of allergy diagnostic testing: report from the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Specific IgE Test Task Force. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Dec;101(6):580-92.

  • Antunes J, Borrego L, Romeira A, Pinto P. Skin prick tests and allergy diagnosis. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2009 May-Jun;37(3):155-64. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0546(09)71728-8. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

  • Bernstein IL, Li JT, Bernstein DI, Hamilton R, Spector SL, Tan R, Sicherer S, Golden DB, Khan DA, Nicklas RA, Portnoy JM, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Lang DM, Oppenheimer J, Randolph CC, Schuller DE, Tilles SA, Wallace DV, Levetin E, Weber R; American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Mar;100(3 Suppl 3):S1-148. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)60305-5. No abstract available.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, Immediate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immune System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This study employed a paired comparison design with each participant serving as their own control. Participants were assigned to one of two device comparison groups: (1) 10-head device comparison (AllerTest-10 vs. Skintestor OMNI, n=13), or (2) 8-head device comparison (AllerTest-8 vs. Multi-Test II, n=17). Within each comparison group, both devices were applied simultaneously-one to each forearm-with randomized left/right assignment. Each device was loaded with standardized histamine positive control and glycerin negative control. This within-subject design eliminates inter-subject variability in skin reactivity, providing robust paired comparisons of device performance on pain perception, control accuracy (sensitivity/specificity), and intra-device consistency.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2026

First Posted

February 10, 2026

Study Start

November 12, 2025

Primary Completion

November 30, 2025

Study Completion

January 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations