Impact of Rotator Cuff Repair on Rehabilitation Outcome
Impact of Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis on Rehabilitation Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair
1 other identifier
observational
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study will investigate the difference between BTT (biceps tenotomy ) versus BTD (biceps tenodesis)in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair on postoperative shoulder pain levels, shoulder function, HGS, forearm supination muscle strength, elbow flexion strength
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2027
February 6, 2026
February 1, 2026
1 year
January 26, 2026
February 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain level
Assessed by Visual analog scale : used to assess acute pain particularly effective post-operatively for tracking individual progress . The patients mark their current pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by verbal descriptors . Scoring is : 0 for No symptoms , 10 for very severe symptoms
3 time intervals ( pre , within 1 week post , 3 months post )
shoulder function
Will be Assessed by Arabic version of American Shoulder and Elbow Suregeons and Constant Score questionnares \* American shoulder and Elbow Surgeons used to evaluate shoulder function and pain . Patient answer 10 daily activity questions each scored from 0 ( unable) to 3 (normal function ) while the pain assessed by visual analog scale Pain scaore is converted to another 50 point Score total is 100 points ( 50 pain + 50 function ) Higher scores is indication for better shoulder function \* Constant score used to assess shoulder function recovery . It has 2 sections : 1)subjective : 35 points : patient reports on pain and daily activity ability. 2)objective : 65 points : clinical measures for range of motion and strength Grading : pain + activities 0\_35 points Range of motion +strength 0\_65 points Strength is measured as 1 point per pound lifted for 5 sec ..25 points Score total is 100 points .. The higher is better
3 time intervals ( pre , within 1 week post , 3 months post )
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Hand grip strength
3 time intervals ( pre , within 1 week post , 3 months post )
Elbow flexion strength
3 time intervals ( pre , within 1 week post , 3 months post )
Forearm supination strength
3 time intervals ( pre , within 1 week post , 3 months post )
Study Arms (2)
Biceps tenotomy
Patients will be grouped according to their surgical intervention combined with the rotator cuff repair by orthopaedic surgeon. They will be assessed at 3 times interval ( preoperative , within 1 week post operative and after 3 months ).To identify its effect on rehabilitation outcomes in comparison to patients with biceps tenodesis .
Biceps tenodesis
Patients will be grouped according to their surgical intervention combined with the rotator cuff repair by orthopaedic surgeon. They will be assessed at 3 times interval ( preoperative , within 1 week post operative and after 3 months ).To identify its effect on rehabilitation outcomes in comparison to patients with biceps tenotomy.
Interventions
is a precision instrument used to measure isometric grip strength. It is widely recognized in clinical research as the "gold standard" for assessing hand strength and general upper-body physical function due to its high test-retest reliability and inter-instrument validity.
Eligibility Criteria
50 all gender patients with rotator cuff tear , they will be selected based on inclusion criteria and allocated based on type of surgery either combined with long head of biceps tenotomy or tenodesis . They will be grouped according to their surgical intervention by orthopaedic surgeon into 2 cohorts . 25 patients for biceps tenotomy and 25 patients for biceps tenodesis .
You may qualify if:
- The participant's selection will be based on the following criteria:
- Both genders adults diagnosed with ≥ 1-cm full-thickness tears of rotator cuff.
- Age ranged from 50 to 70 years .
- LHB pathology is involved that will receive ARCR combined with biceps tenotomy or tenodesis.
- Arthroscopically confirmed LHB pathology.
- Functionality according to their physical level -
You may not qualify if:
- Participants will be excluded if they have any of the following criteria:
- Massive irreparable tears.
- Inflammatory arthritis.
- Thyroid disease.
- Glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
- Severe cervical disorders or paralysis of the axillary nerve.
- Previous surgery of the affected shoulder.
- Revision surgeries for a rotator cuff tear.
- Complete LHBT rupture. -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Related Publications (2)
Liu YC, Huang SW, Adams CR, Lin CY, Chen YP, Kuo YJ, Chuang TY. Preoperative handgrip strength can predict early postoperative shoulder function in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 30;19(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04750-8.
PMID: 38689328BACKGROUNDAouad D, El Rassi G. Shoulder Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Biceps Tenodesis and Acromioplasty Using a Single Working Portal. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Mar 22;10(4):e1125-e1129. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.01.005. eCollection 2021 Apr.
PMID: 33981560BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Nardin Samuel Nasief : Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2026
First Posted
February 6, 2026
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02