NCT07391085

Brief Summary

This study evaluated whether an augmented reality (AR)-based training system improves preparation for simulated vaginal birth compared with traditional text- and video-based learning. Vaginal birth is a complex clinical skill that requires integration of technical actions, situational awareness, and professional behaviors, and opportunities for hands-on training may be limited during undergraduate education. Undergraduate medical students and midwifery students from two universities in Chile and Colombia were randomly assigned to either conventional preparation (text and instructional video) or the same preparation supplemented with an AR training module. The AR system allowed students to explore a simulated vaginal birth scenario in a self-directed manner before participating in hands-on simulation. All students then completed a standardized simulated vaginal birth using a high-fidelity simulator as part of their regular curriculum. Performance during the first simulation was assessed by blinded evaluators using a validated Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) checklist. The primary outcome was achievement of a predefined minimum competency threshold, with secondary outcomes including overall performance scores, completion of critical tasks, and learner satisfaction. The goal of this study was to determine whether AR-based pre-simulation training enhances early performance in simulated vaginal birth and could serve as a scalable educational tool to support competency-based training in obstetrics.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
389

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 8, 2023

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 27, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 23, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 20, 2026

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

augmented realitysimulation-based educationvaginal birthobstetric trainingcompetency-based educationmedical educationmidwifery education

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of participants achieving the minimum competency threshold during simulated vaginal birth

    Achievement of a predefined minimum competency threshold assessed using a validated Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) checklist during a standardized simulated vaginal birth. Competency was defined as a DOPS score ≥35 with successful completion of all critical items.

    Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Mean Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) score during simulated vaginal birth

    Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)

  • Number of participants completing all critical tasks during simulated vaginal birth

    Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)

  • Learner satisfaction with the training experience

    Immediately after the simulation session

Study Arms (2)

Conventional Training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received conventional pre-simulation preparation consisting of text-based materials and an instructional video covering uncomplicated vaginal birth.

Other: Conventional Training

Augmented Reality Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received conventional text- and video-based preparation supplemented with an augmented reality-based pre-simulation training module.

Other: Augmented Reality Training

Interventions

Text- and video-based preparation for simulated vaginal birth.

Conventional Training

Augmented reality-based pre-simulation training module for vaginal birth.

Augmented Reality Training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Undergraduate medical students or midwifery students enrolled in obstetrics and gynecology or women's health courses at the participating universities.
  • Enrollment in the corresponding academic cohort during the study period.
  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Willingness to participate and provision of informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Declined participation or withdrawal of consent.
  • Incomplete participation in the simulation session.
  • Incomplete or missing performance assessment data.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Valenzuela, M. T., & Carvajal Cabrera, J. A. (2022). Eficiencia del entrenamiento simulado del parto vaginal en estudiantes de enfermería/obstetricia: The efficiency of simulated vaginal birth training in nursing/midwifery students. ARS MEDICA Revista De Ciencias Médicas, 47(4), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.11565/arsmed.v47i4.1911

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Jorge A Carvajal, PhD

    Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. Students were identified only by numeric codes during the simulation, and evaluators completed performance assessments without knowledge of whether participants had received augmented reality training.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were randomly assigned in a parallel design to either a control group receiving conventional text- and video-based preparation or an intervention group receiving the same preparation supplemented with augmented reality-based training. Each participant was exposed to only one study arm.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Full Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2026

First Posted

February 5, 2026

Study Start

March 8, 2023

Primary Completion

November 27, 2024

Study Completion

December 23, 2024

Last Updated

February 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical and confidentiality considerations. The dataset includes educational performance assessments of students, collected under informed consent for the purposes of this study only. Data are stored in accordance with institutional policies and applicable regulations, and no plans for public data sharing were approved by the ethics committees.

Locations