Building Relationship, Improving Dialogue, and Growing Empathy (BRIDGE): An Intervention to Support Decision Making for Critically Ill Children
BRIDGE
2 other identifiers
interventional
495
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Parents of young children in the intensive care unit may be faced with decisions about their child's care. The Building Relationship, Improving Dialogue, and Growing Empathy (BRIDGE) intervention was designed to help support parents as they make decisions for their child and communicate with the health care team. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- 1.Do parents who receive the BRIDGE intervention report being better prepared to make decisions for their child?
- 2.Do parents who receive the BRIDGE intervention report less regret about the decisions they made for their child?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2028
May 22, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.1 years
January 29, 2026
May 21, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Parent Preparation for Decision Making, as measured by the PrepDM
Items can be summed and scored. Score ranges from 0-100, where a higher score indicates higher perceived preparedness for decision making.
Approximately 10-14 days following enrollment
Decisional Regret, as measured by the Decision Regret Scale
Decisional Regret will be measured by the Decision Regret Scale (DRS): The DRS is a 5- item scale used to measure distress or remorse after a health care decision.
Approximately 6 and 12 months following enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Shared Decision Making Quality, as measured by the CollaboRATE (Parent version)
Approximately 10-14 days following enrollment
Communication Quality, as measured by the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC-18)
Baseline; Approximately 10-14 days following enrollment
Decisional Conflict, as measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale
Approximately 10-14 days following enrollment; Approximately 6 and 12 months following enrollment
Parent Self-efficacy, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions
Approximately 6 and 12 months following enrollment
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALIn the BRIDGE intervention arm, parents will receive a paper-based tool that includes an introduction to decision-making, a values clarification exercise, and a question prompt list. The tool additionally prompts parents to share how they define decision-relevant concepts like quality of life and suffering for their child. The completed tool is shared with the medical team in the electronic health record.
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONUsual Care
Interventions
The BRIDGE intervention includes a paper-based tool that includes an introduction to decision-making, a values clarification exercise, and a question prompt list. The tool additionally prompts parents to share how they define decision-relevant concepts like quality of life and suffering for their child. The completed tool is shared with the health care team in the electronic health record.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \< 5 years
- Admission to a critical care unit within the preceding 14 days
- An anticipated serious health care decision, defined as a decision about initiating, not initiating, or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and/or a decision about major intervention.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- The ability speak English or Spanish.
- Clinical team member of an enrolled child and parent in the intervention group
- Completion of residency or equivalent training.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Related Publications (1)
Lemmon ME, Bansal S, Nanduri N, Davalos A, Glass HC, Lord B, Moline K, Pilon B, Sharpe R, Brandon D, Hong H, Samsa G, Cox CE, Pollak KI. Feasibility of an Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making for Critically Ill Infants. J Pediatr. 2025 Aug;283:114632. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114632. Epub 2025 May 2.
PMID: 40319938BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monica Lemmon, MD
Duke University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2026
First Posted
February 5, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share