Decision Making Support for Parents and Caregivers
2 other identifiers
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a tool to support decision making for parents of critically ill infants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 29, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 18, 2025
CompletedMarch 18, 2025
February 1, 2025
9 months
January 24, 2023
January 9, 2025
February 27, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Enrollment Rate (Critically Ill Infants)
Intervention and study procedures considered feasible if infant enrollment rate is greater than or equal to 50%.
At enrollment (approximately 9 months)
Complete Data Collection (Critically Ill Infants)
Complete data collection defined as all eligible infant, parent, and clinician data points collected for a given case and was determined at the level of the critically ill infant. Data points for which the participant withdrew prior to relevant data collection were excluded. Intervention and study procedures considered feasible if complete data collection rate is greater than or equal to 80%.
approximately 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Parent and Clinician Acceptability
Up to 4 weeks following use of the tool
Parent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Baseline, and up to 4 weeks following use of the tool
Parent Preparation for Decision Making, as Measured by the PrepDM
Up to 4 weeks following use of the tool
Study Arms (3)
Critically Ill Infants
OTHERParent(s) of critically ill infants received the decision making guide intervention and could choose to share their completed tool with their infant's clinicians.
Parent(s) of Critically Ill Infant
OTHERParent(s) of critically ill infants received the decision making guide intervention and could choose to share their completed tool with their infant's clinicians.
Clinicians
OTHERParent(s) of critically ill infants received the decision making guide intervention and could choose to share their completed tool with their infant's clinicians.
Interventions
The tool includes a brief introduction to the tool and decision-making, a values clarification exercise, and a question prompt list.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \< 1 year,
- admission to a critical care unit, and
- an anticipated serious health care decision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (12)
Lemmon ME, Boss RD, Bonifacio SL, Foster-Barber A, Barkovich AJ, Glass HC. Characterization of Death in Neonatal Encephalopathy in the Hypothermia Era. J Child Neurol. 2017 Mar;32(4):360-365. doi: 10.1177/0883073816681904. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
PMID: 28193115BACKGROUNDEmanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992 Apr 22-29;267(16):2221-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 1556799BACKGROUNDCarlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, Cassell J, Cox P, Hill N, Hinds C, Pimentel JM, Reinhart K, Thompson BT. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med. 2004 May;30(5):770-84. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2241-5. Epub 2004 Apr 20.
PMID: 15098087BACKGROUNDWhite DB, Braddock CH 3rd, Bereknyei S, Curtis JR. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):461-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.461.
PMID: 17353493BACKGROUNDAzoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, Pochard F, Barboteu M, Adrie C, Canoui P, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):3044-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00061.
PMID: 10966293BACKGROUNDCurtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Rubenfeld GD. Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Apr 15;171(8):844-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1267OC. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
PMID: 15640361BACKGROUNDCox CE, Lewis CL, Hanson LC, Hough CL, Kahn JM, White DB, Song MK, Tulsky JA, Carson SS. Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for surrogates of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2327-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182536a63.
PMID: 22635048BACKGROUNDStacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
PMID: 28402085BACKGROUNDCox CE, White DB, Hough CL, Jones DM, Kahn JM, Olsen MK, Lewis CL, Hanson LC, Carson SS. Effects of a Personalized Web-Based Decision Aid for Surrogate Decision Makers of Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 5;170(5):285-297. doi: 10.7326/M18-2335. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
PMID: 30690645BACKGROUNDBoss RD, Hutton N, Sulpar LJ, West AM, Donohue PK. Values parents apply to decision-making regarding delivery room resuscitation for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics. 2008 Sep;122(3):583-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1972.
PMID: 18762529BACKGROUNDZupancic JA, Kirpalani H, Barrett J, Stewart S, Gafni A, Streiner D, Beecroft ML, Smith P. Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 Sep;87(2):F113-7. doi: 10.1136/fn.87.2.f113.
PMID: 12193517BACKGROUNDLemmon ME, Bansal S, Nanduri N, Davalos A, Glass HC, Lord B, Moline K, Pilon B, Sharpe R, Brandon D, Hong H, Samsa G, Cox CE, Pollak KI. Feasibility of an Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making for Critically Ill Infants. J Pediatr. 2025 Aug;283:114632. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114632. Epub 2025 May 2.
PMID: 40319938DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Monica Lemmon
- Organization
- Duke Univerisity Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monica Lemmon, MD
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2023
First Posted
February 17, 2023
Study Start
May 2, 2023
Primary Completion
January 29, 2024
Study Completion
January 29, 2024
Last Updated
March 18, 2025
Results First Posted
March 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share individual participant level data