NCT07386496

Brief Summary

This study is a multi-center RCT to compare the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection and/or change in clinical management in MRI guided (MRI arm) biopsy and MRI+18F-PSMA guided (Combined arm) biopsies in men with equivocal MRI prostate scans. If additional clinical value is shown by adding 18F-PSMA PET to equivocal MRI, then this should be the new standard of care.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
23mo left

Started Mar 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress9%
Mar 2026Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 20, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 4, 2026

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2026

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2028

Last Updated

February 4, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Prostate cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Proportion of men with clinically significant Prostate cancer (csPCa)

    ISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • Proportion of men with additional csPCa detected only in PET targets which will affect clinical management

    Determined by an independent and blinded panel with 3 urologists, including: * a change of nerve-sparing approach if radical prostatectomy is considered, * consideration or extent of focal therapy (partial gland ablation) of the prostate

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Proportion of men with csPCa detected in targeted and systematic biopsy

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • Proportion of men with diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • Proportion of men in combined arm with negative PET who could avoid a biopsy

    When PET results available, at an expected average of 7 days post-scan

  • Correlation Between PET SUVmax of Targeted Lesion and Histologically Confirmed Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa)

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • Proportion of men with post-biopsy adverse events within 30 days after biopsy

    30 days post biopsy

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

COMBINED arm

EXPERIMENTAL

In the COMBINED arm, additional pelvis-only 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT is performed within 6 months from mpMRI and before biopsy. Nuclear Medicine specialist interpreting PET-CT is blinded to clinical or MRI information.

Procedure: MRI+PSMA-guided approach

MRI arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the MRI arm, MRI-guided biopsy plus more than 12-core systematic biopsy will be performed.

Procedure: MRI-guided approach

Interventions

MRI+PSMA-guided approach prostate biopsy

COMBINED arm

MRI-guided approach prostate biopsy

MRI arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsMale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men ≥18 years of age
  • Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-15 ng/mL, repeated at least once
  • Prostate mpMRI done within 6 months
  • MRI prostate with PI-RADS (11) scores of:
  • PI-RADS score 2 with red flag (PSA density \>0.2 OR Prostate health index, PHI\>35),
  • PI-RADS 3, OR
  • PI-RADS 4 with lower csPCa risks (PSAd \<0.1 OR PHI\<35)
  • Normal Digital rectal examination
  • Patient agrees for targeted and systematic prostate biopsy

You may not qualify if:

  • Prostate biopsy within past 5 years
  • Past or current history of prostate cancer
  • Contraindicated to undergo PSMA PET-CT scan
  • Contraindicated to prostate biopsy: active urinary tract infection, fail insertion of transrectal ultrasound probe into rectum (abdominal perineal resection, anal stenosis), fail to be placed in lithotomy position, uncorrectable coagulopathy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant which cannot be stopped (keep aspirin before and after biopsy is permitted)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (27)

  • Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chu PS, Man CW, Hou SM, Ng CF. Role of PSA density in diagnosis of prostate cancer in obese men. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2251-4. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0826-7. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

    PMID: 25201460BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yee CH, Chan ES, Hou SM, Ng CF. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Sep;57(5):336-42. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.336. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

    PMID: 27617315BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

    PMID: 27349564BACKGROUND
  • Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Masson G, Agnarsson BA, Benediktsdottir KR, Sigurdsson A, Magnusson OT, Gudjonsson SA, Magnusdottir DN, Johannsdottir H, Helgadottir HT, Stacey SN, Jonasdottir A, Olafsdottir SB, Thorleifsson G, Jonasson JG, Tryggvadottir L, Navarrete S, Fuertes F, Helfand BT, Hu Q, Csiki IE, Mates IN, Jinga V, Aben KK, van Oort IM, Vermeulen SH, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Ng CF, Chiu PK, Lau KM, Ng MC, Gulcher JR, Kong A, Catalona WJ, Mayordomo JI, Einarsson GV, Barkardottir RB, Jonsson E, Mates D, Neal DE, Kiemeney LA, Thorsteinsdottir U, Rafnar T, Stefansson K. A study based on whole-genome sequencing yields a rare variant at 8q24 associated with prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2012 Dec;44(12):1326-9. doi: 10.1038/ng.2437. Epub 2012 Oct 28.

    PMID: 23104005BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Leow JJ, Chiang CH, Mok A, Zhang K, Hsieh PF, Zhu Y, Lam W, Tsang WC, Fan YH, Lin TP, Chan TY, Leung CH, Teoh JY, Chu PS, Zhu G, Ye DW, Wu HC, Tan TW, Tsu JH, Ng CF, Chiong E, Huang CY. Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation. J Urol. 2023 Jul;210(1):88-98. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003450. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

    PMID: 37036248BACKGROUND
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND
  • Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.

    PMID: 26492179BACKGROUND
  • Luo L, Zheng A, Chang R, Li Y, Gao J, Wang Z, Duan X. Evaluating the value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in the detection and identification of prostate cancer using histopathology as the standard. Cancer Imaging. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00627-x.

    PMID: 37924154BACKGROUND
  • Hoffmann MA, Muller-Hubenthal J, Rosar F, Fischer N, von Eyben FE, Buchholz HG, Wieler HJ, Schreckenberger M. Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer Patients with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT Compared with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 29;11(17):5064. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175064.

    PMID: 36078994BACKGROUND
  • Prive BM, Israel B, Janssen MJR, van der Leest MMG, de Rooij M, van Ipenburg JA, Jonker M, Peters SMB, de Groot M, Zamecnik P, Hoepping A, Bomers JG, Gotthardt M, Sedelaar JPM, Barentsz JO, van Oort IM, Nagarajah J. Multiparametric MRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2024 May;311(2):e231879. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231879.

    PMID: 38771185BACKGROUND
  • Margel D, Bernstine H, Groshar D, Ber Y, Nezrit O, Segal N, Yakimov M, Baniel J, Domachevsky L. Diagnostic Performance of 68Ga Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET/MRI Compared with Multiparametric MRI for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2021 Nov;301(2):379-386. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204093. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

    PMID: 34463555BACKGROUND
  • Buteau JP, Moon D, Fahey MT, Roberts MJ, Thompson J, Murphy DG, Papa N, Mitchell C, De Abreu Lourenco R, Dhillon HM, Kasivisvanathan V, Francis RJ, Stricker P, Agrawal S, O'Brien J, McVey A, Sharma G, Levy S, Ayati N, Nguyen A, Lee SF, Pattison DA, Sivaratnam D, Frydenberg M, Du Y, Titus J, Lee ST, Ischia J, Jack G, Hofman MS, Emmett L. Clinical Trial Protocol for PRIMARY2: A Multicentre, Phase 3, Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Additive Diagnostic Value of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Men with Negative or Equivocal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):544-552. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.008. Epub 2023 Dec 6.

    PMID: 38061976BACKGROUND
  • Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, Rasiah K, Pattison DA, Yaxley J, Thomas P, Hutton AC, Agrawal S, Amin A, Blazevski A, Chalasani V, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Sheehan-Dare G, Kooner R, Coughlin G, Chan L, Cusick T, Namdarian B, Kapoor J, Alghazo O, Woo HH, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy D, Hofman MS, Stricker P. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study. Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

    PMID: 34465492BACKGROUND
  • Jain H, Sood R, Faridi MS, Goel H, Sharma U. Role of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for the detection of primary prostate cancer prior to biopsy: a prospective study. Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):315-320. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0084.R3. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

    PMID: 34729219BACKGROUND
  • Padhani AR, Barentsz J, Villeirs G, Rosenkrantz AB, Margolis DJ, Turkbey B, Thoeny HC, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Verma S, Weinreb JC. PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway. Radiology. 2019 Aug;292(2):464-474. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182946. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

    PMID: 31184561BACKGROUND
  • Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.

    PMID: 31022301BACKGROUND
  • Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

    PMID: 30082150BACKGROUND
  • Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

    PMID: 30898406BACKGROUND
  • Hamoen EHJ, de Rooij M, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1112-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.033. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

    PMID: 25466942BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

    PMID: 27897172BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Stephan C, Haese A, Bruijne I, Teoh JY, Leung CH, Casale P, Chiang CH, Tan LG, Chiong E, Huang CY, Wu HC, Nieboer D, Ye DW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

    PMID: 30396635BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

    PMID: 28498624BACKGROUND
  • Carter HB, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Sanders RC, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1008-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38971-1.

    PMID: 2677409BACKGROUND
  • Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

    PMID: 31493960BACKGROUND
  • Wong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30178778BACKGROUND
  • Chan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

    PMID: 27932742BACKGROUND
  • Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

    PMID: 38572751BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Peter Ka-Fung CHIU

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Peter Ka-Fung CHIU

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2026

First Posted

February 4, 2026

Study Start

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Last Updated

February 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations