The Role of 18F-PSMA PET in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Equivocal MRI
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a multi-center RCT to compare the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection and/or change in clinical management in MRI guided (MRI arm) biopsy and MRI+18F-PSMA guided (Combined arm) biopsies in men with equivocal MRI prostate scans. If additional clinical value is shown by adding 18F-PSMA PET to equivocal MRI, then this should be the new standard of care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Mar 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2028
February 4, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.8 years
January 20, 2026
January 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of men with clinically significant Prostate cancer (csPCa)
ISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Proportion of men with additional csPCa detected only in PET targets which will affect clinical management
Determined by an independent and blinded panel with 3 urologists, including: * a change of nerve-sparing approach if radical prostatectomy is considered, * consideration or extent of focal therapy (partial gland ablation) of the prostate
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Proportion of men with csPCa detected in targeted and systematic biopsy
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Proportion of men with diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Proportion of men in combined arm with negative PET who could avoid a biopsy
When PET results available, at an expected average of 7 days post-scan
Correlation Between PET SUVmax of Targeted Lesion and Histologically Confirmed Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa)
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Proportion of men with post-biopsy adverse events within 30 days after biopsy
30 days post biopsy
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
COMBINED arm
EXPERIMENTALIn the COMBINED arm, additional pelvis-only 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT is performed within 6 months from mpMRI and before biopsy. Nuclear Medicine specialist interpreting PET-CT is blinded to clinical or MRI information.
MRI arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the MRI arm, MRI-guided biopsy plus more than 12-core systematic biopsy will be performed.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men ≥18 years of age
- Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-15 ng/mL, repeated at least once
- Prostate mpMRI done within 6 months
- MRI prostate with PI-RADS (11) scores of:
- PI-RADS score 2 with red flag (PSA density \>0.2 OR Prostate health index, PHI\>35),
- PI-RADS 3, OR
- PI-RADS 4 with lower csPCa risks (PSAd \<0.1 OR PHI\<35)
- Normal Digital rectal examination
- Patient agrees for targeted and systematic prostate biopsy
You may not qualify if:
- Prostate biopsy within past 5 years
- Past or current history of prostate cancer
- Contraindicated to undergo PSMA PET-CT scan
- Contraindicated to prostate biopsy: active urinary tract infection, fail insertion of transrectal ultrasound probe into rectum (abdominal perineal resection, anal stenosis), fail to be placed in lithotomy position, uncorrectable coagulopathy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant which cannot be stopped (keep aspirin before and after biopsy is permitted)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (27)
Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chu PS, Man CW, Hou SM, Ng CF. Role of PSA density in diagnosis of prostate cancer in obese men. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2251-4. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0826-7. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
PMID: 25201460BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yee CH, Chan ES, Hou SM, Ng CF. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Sep;57(5):336-42. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.336. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
PMID: 27617315BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
PMID: 27349564BACKGROUNDGudmundsson J, Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Masson G, Agnarsson BA, Benediktsdottir KR, Sigurdsson A, Magnusson OT, Gudjonsson SA, Magnusdottir DN, Johannsdottir H, Helgadottir HT, Stacey SN, Jonasdottir A, Olafsdottir SB, Thorleifsson G, Jonasson JG, Tryggvadottir L, Navarrete S, Fuertes F, Helfand BT, Hu Q, Csiki IE, Mates IN, Jinga V, Aben KK, van Oort IM, Vermeulen SH, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Ng CF, Chiu PK, Lau KM, Ng MC, Gulcher JR, Kong A, Catalona WJ, Mayordomo JI, Einarsson GV, Barkardottir RB, Jonsson E, Mates D, Neal DE, Kiemeney LA, Thorsteinsdottir U, Rafnar T, Stefansson K. A study based on whole-genome sequencing yields a rare variant at 8q24 associated with prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2012 Dec;44(12):1326-9. doi: 10.1038/ng.2437. Epub 2012 Oct 28.
PMID: 23104005BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Leow JJ, Chiang CH, Mok A, Zhang K, Hsieh PF, Zhu Y, Lam W, Tsang WC, Fan YH, Lin TP, Chan TY, Leung CH, Teoh JY, Chu PS, Zhu G, Ye DW, Wu HC, Tan TW, Tsu JH, Ng CF, Chiong E, Huang CY. Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation. J Urol. 2023 Jul;210(1):88-98. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003450. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
PMID: 37036248BACKGROUNDDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PMID: 15273542BACKGROUNDEpstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
PMID: 26492179BACKGROUNDLuo L, Zheng A, Chang R, Li Y, Gao J, Wang Z, Duan X. Evaluating the value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in the detection and identification of prostate cancer using histopathology as the standard. Cancer Imaging. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00627-x.
PMID: 37924154BACKGROUNDHoffmann MA, Muller-Hubenthal J, Rosar F, Fischer N, von Eyben FE, Buchholz HG, Wieler HJ, Schreckenberger M. Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer Patients with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT Compared with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 29;11(17):5064. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175064.
PMID: 36078994BACKGROUNDPrive BM, Israel B, Janssen MJR, van der Leest MMG, de Rooij M, van Ipenburg JA, Jonker M, Peters SMB, de Groot M, Zamecnik P, Hoepping A, Bomers JG, Gotthardt M, Sedelaar JPM, Barentsz JO, van Oort IM, Nagarajah J. Multiparametric MRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2024 May;311(2):e231879. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231879.
PMID: 38771185BACKGROUNDMargel D, Bernstine H, Groshar D, Ber Y, Nezrit O, Segal N, Yakimov M, Baniel J, Domachevsky L. Diagnostic Performance of 68Ga Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET/MRI Compared with Multiparametric MRI for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2021 Nov;301(2):379-386. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204093. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
PMID: 34463555BACKGROUNDButeau JP, Moon D, Fahey MT, Roberts MJ, Thompson J, Murphy DG, Papa N, Mitchell C, De Abreu Lourenco R, Dhillon HM, Kasivisvanathan V, Francis RJ, Stricker P, Agrawal S, O'Brien J, McVey A, Sharma G, Levy S, Ayati N, Nguyen A, Lee SF, Pattison DA, Sivaratnam D, Frydenberg M, Du Y, Titus J, Lee ST, Ischia J, Jack G, Hofman MS, Emmett L. Clinical Trial Protocol for PRIMARY2: A Multicentre, Phase 3, Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Additive Diagnostic Value of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Men with Negative or Equivocal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):544-552. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.008. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
PMID: 38061976BACKGROUNDEmmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, Rasiah K, Pattison DA, Yaxley J, Thomas P, Hutton AC, Agrawal S, Amin A, Blazevski A, Chalasani V, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Sheehan-Dare G, Kooner R, Coughlin G, Chan L, Cusick T, Namdarian B, Kapoor J, Alghazo O, Woo HH, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy D, Hofman MS, Stricker P. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study. Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
PMID: 34465492BACKGROUNDJain H, Sood R, Faridi MS, Goel H, Sharma U. Role of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for the detection of primary prostate cancer prior to biopsy: a prospective study. Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):315-320. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0084.R3. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
PMID: 34729219BACKGROUNDPadhani AR, Barentsz J, Villeirs G, Rosenkrantz AB, Margolis DJ, Turkbey B, Thoeny HC, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Verma S, Weinreb JC. PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway. Radiology. 2019 Aug;292(2):464-474. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182946. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
PMID: 31184561BACKGROUNDDrost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
PMID: 31022301BACKGROUNDAlberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PMID: 30082150BACKGROUNDTurkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30898406BACKGROUNDHamoen EHJ, de Rooij M, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1112-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.033. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
PMID: 25466942BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
PMID: 27897172BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Stephan C, Haese A, Bruijne I, Teoh JY, Leung CH, Casale P, Chiang CH, Tan LG, Chiong E, Huang CY, Wu HC, Nieboer D, Ye DW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
PMID: 30396635BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
PMID: 28498624BACKGROUNDCarter HB, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Sanders RC, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1008-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38971-1.
PMID: 2677409BACKGROUNDCulp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
PMID: 31493960BACKGROUNDWong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available.
PMID: 30178778BACKGROUNDChan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
PMID: 27932742BACKGROUNDBray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
PMID: 38572751BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Ka-Fung CHIU
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2026
First Posted
February 4, 2026
Study Start
March 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2028
Last Updated
February 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share