NCT06303622

Brief Summary

This study is an international multicentre RCT to compare the linically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection of cognitive-guided and MRI-USG guided biopsies in men with suspicious MRI lesion.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
10mo left

Started Jan 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress62%
Jan 2025Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 5, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 8, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2027

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 12, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of men with clinically significant Prostate cancer(csPCa)

    ISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa in MRI lesions with maximal size ≤10mm versus >10mm

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa in prostate size of ≤50ml vs >50m

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • The proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa only in targeted biopsy

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa only in systemic biopsy

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • Proportion of men with a diagnosis of clinically insignificant PCa,

    When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

MRUS arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Targeted biopsies will be performed by software-assisted MRI-ultrasound fusion registration . Software-based fusion targeted biopsy of 4 cores per target followed by 12-core systematic biopsy will be performed. The fusion or overlay of 3D MRI and USG images create a detailed 3D prostate image with both targeted and systematic biopsy core locations recorded.

Procedure: MRI-USG fusion approach

COG arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The biopsy operator reviews the MR images and creates a mental three-dimensional representation of the prostate and the lesion within it to guide biopsy. Cognitive registration is a visual guidance technique in which the surgeon samples a visually estimated location on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) corresponding to the MRI suspicious regions. Cognitive-guided biopsy is performed by taking 4 cores from each target followed by 12-core systematic biopsies.

Procedure: Cognitive-guided approach

Interventions

MRI-USG fusion approach prostate biopsy

MRUS arm

Cognitive-guided approach prostate biopsy

COG arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsMale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men ≥18 years of age
  • Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and indicated for prostate biopsy
  • Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \< 20 ng/mL
  • Digital rectal examination ≤ cT2 (organ-confined cancer)
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • MRI prostate (contrast or plain) showing 1-3 suspicious lesion(s) with PI-RADS score 3-5

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior prostate biopsy in the 2 years before screening visit
  • Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • Contraindicated to prostate biopsy: active urinary tract infection, failed insertion of transrectal ultrasound probe into rectum (abdominal perineal resection, anal stenosis), uncorrectable coagulopathy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant which cannot be stopped (continue low-dose aspirin before and after biopsy is permitted)
  • Patient refusal for biopsy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

RECRUITING

Related Publications (16)

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

    PMID: 33538338BACKGROUND
  • Chan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

    PMID: 27932742BACKGROUND
  • Wong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30178778BACKGROUND
  • Patasius A, Smailyte G. Re: MaryBeth B. Culp, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Jason A. Efstathiou, Freddie Bray, Ahmedin Jemal. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol 2020;77:38-52. Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):e132. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.030. Epub 2019 Dec 13. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31843337BACKGROUND
  • Ahdoot M, Wilbur AR, Reese SE, Lebastchi AH, Mehralivand S, Gomella PT, Bloom J, Gurram S, Siddiqui M, Pinsky P, Parnes H, Linehan WM, Merino M, Choyke PL, Shih JH, Turkbey B, Wood BJ, Pinto PA. MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038.

    PMID: 32130814BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

    PMID: 28498624BACKGROUND
  • Heidegger I, Pichler R. Re: Peter K.-F. Chiu, Chi-Fai Ng, Axel Semjonow, et al. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol 2019;75:558-61. Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):e158-e159. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30616947BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

    PMID: 27897172BACKGROUND
  • Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

    PMID: 30898406BACKGROUND
  • Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

    PMID: 30082150BACKGROUND
  • Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.

    PMID: 31022301BACKGROUND
  • Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

    PMID: 28110982BACKGROUND
  • Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.

    PMID: 29552975BACKGROUND
  • Connor MJ, Gorin MA, Eldred-Evans D, Bass EJ, Desai A, Dudderidge T, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Landmarks in the evolution of prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Apr;20(4):241-258. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00684-0. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

    PMID: 36653670BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

    PMID: 27349564BACKGROUND
  • Gigot O. [Treatment of alcoholic intoxication (exclusive of acute attacks)]. Infirm Fr. 1970 Jun;116:31 passimc. No abstract available. French.

    PMID: 5201460BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Peter Ka-Fungq CHIU

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Peter Ka-Fungq CHIU, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2024

First Posted

March 12, 2024

Study Start

January 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations