Comparing MRI-Ultrasound Fusion and Cognitive-guided Biopsy for the Detection of csPCa: the PROFUSION Trial
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing MRI-Ultrasound Fusion and Cognitive-guided Biopsy for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: the PROFUSION Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is an international multicentre RCT to compare the linically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection of cognitive-guided and MRI-USG guided biopsies in men with suspicious MRI lesion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Jan 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 8, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2027
February 17, 2026
May 1, 2025
2 years
March 5, 2024
February 12, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of men with clinically significant Prostate cancer(csPCa)
ISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa in MRI lesions with maximal size ≤10mm versus >10mm
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa in prostate size of ≤50ml vs >50m
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
The proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa only in targeted biopsy
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa only in systemic biopsy
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
Proportion of men with a diagnosis of clinically insignificant PCa,
When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MRUS arm
EXPERIMENTALTargeted biopsies will be performed by software-assisted MRI-ultrasound fusion registration . Software-based fusion targeted biopsy of 4 cores per target followed by 12-core systematic biopsy will be performed. The fusion or overlay of 3D MRI and USG images create a detailed 3D prostate image with both targeted and systematic biopsy core locations recorded.
COG arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe biopsy operator reviews the MR images and creates a mental three-dimensional representation of the prostate and the lesion within it to guide biopsy. Cognitive registration is a visual guidance technique in which the surgeon samples a visually estimated location on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) corresponding to the MRI suspicious regions. Cognitive-guided biopsy is performed by taking 4 cores from each target followed by 12-core systematic biopsies.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men ≥18 years of age
- Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and indicated for prostate biopsy
- Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \< 20 ng/mL
- Digital rectal examination ≤ cT2 (organ-confined cancer)
- Able to provide written informed consent
- MRI prostate (contrast or plain) showing 1-3 suspicious lesion(s) with PI-RADS score 3-5
You may not qualify if:
- Prior prostate biopsy in the 2 years before screening visit
- Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer
- Contraindicated to prostate biopsy: active urinary tract infection, failed insertion of transrectal ultrasound probe into rectum (abdominal perineal resection, anal stenosis), uncorrectable coagulopathy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant which cannot be stopped (continue low-dose aspirin before and after biopsy is permitted)
- Patient refusal for biopsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Chinacollaborator
- China Medical University Hospitalcollaborator
- Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Polandcollaborator
- Kaohsiung Medical Universitycollaborator
- Tuen Mun Hospital Hong Kongcollaborator
- Stanford Cancer Institutecollaborator
- Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kongcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (16)
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338BACKGROUNDChan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
PMID: 27932742BACKGROUNDWong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available.
PMID: 30178778BACKGROUNDPatasius A, Smailyte G. Re: MaryBeth B. Culp, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Jason A. Efstathiou, Freddie Bray, Ahmedin Jemal. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol 2020;77:38-52. Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):e132. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.030. Epub 2019 Dec 13. No abstract available.
PMID: 31843337BACKGROUNDAhdoot M, Wilbur AR, Reese SE, Lebastchi AH, Mehralivand S, Gomella PT, Bloom J, Gurram S, Siddiqui M, Pinsky P, Parnes H, Linehan WM, Merino M, Choyke PL, Shih JH, Turkbey B, Wood BJ, Pinto PA. MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038.
PMID: 32130814BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
PMID: 28498624BACKGROUNDHeidegger I, Pichler R. Re: Peter K.-F. Chiu, Chi-Fai Ng, Axel Semjonow, et al. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol 2019;75:558-61. Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):e158-e159. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 30616947BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
PMID: 27897172BACKGROUNDTurkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30898406BACKGROUNDAlberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PMID: 30082150BACKGROUNDDrost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
PMID: 31022301BACKGROUNDAhmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PMID: 28110982BACKGROUNDKasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
PMID: 29552975BACKGROUNDConnor MJ, Gorin MA, Eldred-Evans D, Bass EJ, Desai A, Dudderidge T, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Landmarks in the evolution of prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Apr;20(4):241-258. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00684-0. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
PMID: 36653670BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
PMID: 27349564BACKGROUNDGigot O. [Treatment of alcoholic intoxication (exclusive of acute attacks)]. Infirm Fr. 1970 Jun;116:31 passimc. No abstract available. French.
PMID: 5201460BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Ka-Fungq CHIU
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2024
First Posted
March 12, 2024
Study Start
January 8, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share