Impact of Bupivacaine Dilution With Dextrose or Saline on Infraclavicular Block Outcomes
The Effect of Diluting Bupivacaine With 5% Dextrose and 0.9% NaCl on Block Success and Duration of Analgesia in Infraclavicular Block
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
D5W) has long been used as an intravenous fluid for hydration and energy supplementation and has recently gained increasing clinical interest in perineural injection therapies and ultrasound-guided hydrodissection. D5W has been shown to improve pain and functional outcomes in entrapment neuropathies by mechanically releasing perineural adhesions and potentially modulating neurogenic inflammation. In contrast, 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline) is routinely used as a dilution medium for local anesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks; however, emerging evidence suggests that alternative diluents such as D5W may influence block onset and efficacy. The infraclavicular block is a commonly used ultrasound-guided technique for brachial plexus anesthesia, providing reliable anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for upper extremity surgery. This study aims to compare the effects of diluting bupivacaine with either D5W or 0.9% NaCl on block success and duration of analgesia in patients undergoing infraclavicular block. Secondary outcomes include block onset characteristics, sensory and motor block profiles, and perioperative analgesic requirements. The findings may help determine whether D5W represents a safe and effective alternative diluent to saline in routine regional anesthesia practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2026
March 11, 2026
January 1, 2026
2 months
January 28, 2026
March 9, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensory block onset time
Sensory block onset time will be defined as the time from completion of the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block until the participant reports complete loss of pinprick sensation in the dermatomal areas corresponding to the branches of the brachial plexus, assessed using a sterile pinprick test.
Assessed at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes after block administration.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Motor block duration
From block performance until complete motor recovery (up to 24 hours postoperatively).
Intraoperative need for additional anesthetic or analgesic intervention
During the intraoperative period.
Postoperative analgesic efficacy
Postoperative 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours.
Study Arms (2)
Group D
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block using bupivacaine diluted in a 1:1 ratio with 5% dextrose in water (D5W) to achieve a predetermined total injection volume (e.g., total volume of 30 mL). The block will be performed under standardized aseptic conditions by an experienced anesthesiologist. Block success, sensory and motor block characteristics, duration of analgesia, and postoperative analgesic requirements will be assessed and recorded.
Group S
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block using bupivacaine diluted in a 1:1 ratio with 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline) to achieve a predetermined total injection volume (e.g., total volume of 30 mL). The block will be performed under standardized aseptic conditions by an experienced anesthesiologist. Block success, sensory and motor block characteristics, duration of analgesia, and postoperative analgesic requirements will be assessed and recorded.
Interventions
All eligible participants will be informed in detail about the study objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits by the responsible investigator, and all questions will be answered prior to enrollment. Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant before any study-related procedures are initiated. Following the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block, sensory block assessment will be performed using a sterile single-use needle for a pinprick test. Light punctate stimuli will be applied to dermatomal areas corresponding to the branches of the brachial plexus on the blocked extremity. Participants will be asked to compare the sensation with the contralateral limb and to report the perceived sensation as "normal," "reduced," or "absent." Sensory block assessments will be performed at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes after block administration. Sensory block onset time will be defined as the time point at which the participant reports absence of pinprick sensation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who agree to participate in the study and provide written informed consent
- Patients scheduled for elective upper extremity surgery for whom infraclavicular block is considered appropriate for anesthetic management
- Age between 18 and 65 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Patients with a normal neurological examination in the extremity scheduled for peripheral nerve block
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who decline to participate in the study or refuse to provide informed consent
- History of allergy or hypersensitivity to study medications
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²
- Body weight less than 40 kg
- Age below 18 years or above 65 years
- History of significant cardiac disease (e.g., arrhythmia, conduction disorders)
- Presence of coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \[INR\] \> 1.5 and/or platelet count \< 100,000/mm³)
- Hepatic failure or significant liver dysfunction
- Pregnant patients
- Infection at the planned peripheral block site
- Presence of neurological deficit in the extremity planned for peripheral nerve block
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and/or established diabetic neuropathy
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status IV
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sakarya University-Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department
Sakarya, 54100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The anesthesiologist performing the block will be aware of the study solution due to preparation requirements. Patients, outcome assessors, and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation to minimize assessment and analysis bias.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiology Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2026
First Posted
February 4, 2026
Study Start
March 9, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 15, 2026
Last Updated
March 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share