Ultrasound Predictors of Difficult Airway in Adults
Investigation of Ultrasonographic Predictors of Difficult Intubation and Difficult Mask Ventilation in Adult Patients
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Difficult airway management is a major cause of perioperative complications. Standard bedside airway assessment tests may have limited ability to predict difficult intubation and difficult mask ventilation. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate whether preoperative ultrasound measurements of airway structures (such as skin-to-epiglottis distance, tongue thickness, and pre-epiglottic space) can predict difficult intubation and difficult mask ventilation in adult patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2026
CompletedFebruary 5, 2026
January 1, 2026
1 year
January 26, 2026
February 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants with Difficult Intubation
Difficult intubation was defined as requiring two or more intubation attempts (≥2 attempts) during induction of general anesthesia.
During induction of anesthesia (intraoperative)
Number of Participants with Difficult Mask Ventilation
Difficult mask ventilation was defined as the need for two-handed mask ventilation or inability to ventilate adequately using a face mask
During induction of anesthesia (intraoperative)
Study Arms (1)
Cohort 1: Adult patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia
Adult patients (18-70 years, ASA I-III) scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation. Preoperative clinical airway assessment and ultrasonographic airway measurements were recorded, and intraoperative intubation and mask ventilation outcomes were evaluated
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients aged 18-70 years (ASA I-III) scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-70 years
- ASA physical status I-III
- Elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate
- Emergency surgery
- Pregnancy
- Known upper airway pathology or previous airway surgery
- Restricted mouth opening (\<3 cm)
- Cervical spine instability or significant limitation of neck mobility
- Morbid obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m²)
- Obstructive upper airway masses (e.g., head and neck tumors)
- Prior neck radiotherapy
- Clinically relevant neck masses
- Major facial/mandibular trauma or craniofacial anomalies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kütahya Health Sciences University
Kütahya, Kütahya, 3100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
1. Cook TM, MacDougall-Davis SR. Complications and failure of airway management. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109 Suppl 1(suppl 1):i68-i85. 2. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(1):31-81. 3. Roth D, Pace NL, Lee A, Hovhannisyan K, Warenits AM, Arrich J, et al. Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):CD008874. 4. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(2):429-37. 5. Detsky ME, Jivraj N, Adhikari NK, Friedrich JO, Pinto R, Simel DL, et al. Will This Patient Be Difficult to Intubate?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. JAMA. 2019;321(5):493-503. 6. Singh M, Chin KJ, Chan VW, Wong DT, Prasad GA, Yu E. Use of sonography for airway assessment: an observational study. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(1):79-85. 7. Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(5):456-62. 8. Marchis IF, Negrut MF, Blebea CM, Crihan M, Alexa AL, Breazu CM. Trends in Preoperative Airway Assessment. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(6). 9. Yao W, Wang B. Can tongue thickness measured by ultrasonography predict difficult tracheal intubation? Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(4):601-9. 10. Daggupati H, Maurya I, Singh RD, Ravishankar M. Development of a scoring system for predicting difficult intubation using ultrasonography. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64(3):187-92. 11. Sotoodehnia M, Khodayar M, Jalali A, Momeni M, Safaie A, Abdollahi A. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy / difficult intubation cases using upper airway ultrasound measurements in emergency department: a prospective observational study. BMC Emerg Med. 2023;23(1):78
RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Serkan Telli, MD
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2026
First Posted
February 3, 2026
Study Start
October 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 1, 2024
Study Completion
October 1, 2024
Last Updated
February 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional policies and to protect participant privacy and confidentiality.